Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T02:12:02.701Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Wisconsin Radiocarbon Dates XX

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Raymond L Steventon  and
John E Kutzbach
Raymond L Steventon
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
John E Kutzbach
Affiliation:
Center for Climatic Research, Institute for Environmental Studies, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1225 West Dayton Street, Madison, Wisconsin 53706
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Procedures and equipment have been described in previous date lists. Except as otherwise indicated, wood, charcoal, and peat samples are pretreated with dilute NaOH–Na4P2O7 and dilute H3PO4 before conversion to the counting gas methane; marls and lake cores are treated with acid only. Very calcareous materials are treated with HCl instead of H3PO4. Pretreatment of bone varies with the condition of the bone sample; solid bone with little deterioration is first cleaned manually and ultrasonically. The bone is treated with 8% HCl for 15 minutes, then dilute NaOH–Na4P2O7 for 3 hours at room temperature, washed until neutral, and the collagen extracted according to Longin (1971). Charred bone is treated with dilute HCl, NaOH–Na4P2O7, and then dilute HCl again.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 25 , Issue 1 , 1983 , pp. 152 - 168
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Alex, L M, 1979, 39Bu2: A fortified site in western South Dakota: Archaeol Soc South Dakota Newsletter, v 9, no. 3, p 3–7.Google Scholar
Bender, M M, Baerreis, D A, and Bryson, R A, 1980, University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XVII: Radiocarbon, v 22, p 115–129.Google Scholar
Bender, M M, Baerreis, D A, Bryson, R A, and Steventon, R L, 1981, University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XVIII: Radiocarbon, v 23, p 145–161.Google Scholar
Bender, M M, 1982, University of Wisconsin radiocarbon dates XIX: Radiocarbon, v 24, p 83–100.Google Scholar
Chapman, J and Shea, A B, 1981, The archaeobotanical record: Early Archaic period to contact in the lower Little Tennessee R valley: Tennessee Anthropologist, v 6, no. 1, p 61–84.Google Scholar
Davis, M B, 1958, Three pollen diagrams from central Massachusetts: Am Jour Sci, v 256, p 540–570.Google Scholar
Delcourt, P A, 1980, Quaternary alluvial terraces of the Little Tennessee River, East Tennessee, in Chapman, J, ed, The 1979 archaeological and geological investigations in the Tellico Reservoir: Univ Tennessee Dept Anthropol rept inv, p 110–121.Google Scholar
Hovde, D M, 1981, Archaeological excavations of stone circle sites on the southeastern Black Hills periphery and Cheyenne River drainage. South Dakota Archaeol Research Center, Contract Inv Rept no. 36A, Ft Meade.Google Scholar
Jacobson, G L, 1979, The paleoecology of white pine. pinus strobus in Minnesota: Jour Ecol, v 67, p 697–726.Google Scholar
Knox, J C, Clayton, L, and Mickelson, D M, 1982, Quaternary history of the driftless area: Field trip guide book no. 5, Wisconsin Geol Nat Hist Survey, Madison, 169 P.Google Scholar
Knox, J C, McDowell, P F, and Johnson, W C, 1981, Holocene fluvial stratigraphy and climatic change in the driftless area, Wisconsin, in Mahoney, W C, ed, Quaternary paleoclimate: Norwich, England, Geoabs Ltd, p 107–127.Google Scholar
Lamb, H F, 1980, Late Quaternary vegetational history of southeastern Labrador: Arctic and Alpine Research, v 12, no. 2, p 117–135.Google Scholar
Longin, R, 1971, New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating: Nature, v 230, p 241–242.Google Scholar
Lowdon, J A and Blake, Weston Jr, 1975, Radiocarbon dates, Labrador: Geol Survey Canada Paper, v 75–7, p 1–32.Google Scholar
Morrison, A, 1970, Pollen diagrams from interior Labrador: Canadian Jour Bot, v 98, p 1957–1975.Google Scholar
Overstreet, D F, 1981, Archaeological inventory and evaluation at Exxon Minerals Company, Crandon Project site in Forest and Langlade Counties, Wisconsin: Great Lakes Archaeol Research Center, Inc, Rept Inv no. 107.Google Scholar
Prest, V K, 1970, Quaternary geology of Canada, in Geology and Economic Minerals of Canada, ed no. 5: Geol Survey Canada, Econ Geol Rept no. 1, p 677–764.Google Scholar
Reeder, R L, 1982, The Feeler site, 23MS12: A multicomponent site in the central Gasconade Basin: Missouri State Hwy Comm rept.Google Scholar
Salzer, J, ms, 1969, An introduction to the archaeology of Northern Wisconsin: Unpub PhD dissert, Southern Illinois Univ, Carbondale, Illinois.Google Scholar
Salzer, J, 1974, The Wisconsin North Lakes Project: A preliminary report, in Johnson, E, ed, Aspects of Upper Great Lakes anthropology—Essays in honor of Lloyd A Wilford: Minnesota State Hist Soc pubs, St Paul.Google Scholar
Stoltman, J B, 1979, Middle Woodland stage communities of southwestern Wisconsin, in Brose, D S and Grever, N, eds, Hopewell archaeology: Kent University Press, p 122–139.Google Scholar
Van Zant, K L and Lamb, W M, 1980, Post glacial vegetational reconstructions in south-central Wisconsin, based on a core from Lima Bog, Rock County, Wisconsin: Geol Soc America (abs), v 12, p 259.Google Scholar
Whittecar, G R and Davis, A M, 1982, Sedimentology and palynology of Middle Wisconsin deposits in the Pecatonica River Valley, Wisconsin and Illinois: Quaternary Research, v 17, p 228–240.Google Scholar