Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:34:39.326Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Pennsylvania Radiocarbon Dates III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Elizabeth K. Ralph
Elizabeth K. Ralph*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Laboratory, University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The radiocarbon laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania is sponsored jointly by the University Museum and the Physics Department. In this laboratory our primary function is to date archaeologic samples from those four regions of the world in which the University Museum studies are concentrated, namely, the Near East, South America, Central America, and the Arctic. Dates for sites in the first two regions are included in this list, and a long series of temple lintels from Tikal, Guatamala is now being processed. Dates for the Arctic were obtained intermittently from 1953 through 1955 (with solid-carbon counting); others, more recently. The materials for many of the Arctic dates, however, were not reliable; that is, they were physically contaminated before processing in the laboratory. We hope that better samples can be found for future Arctic dating. Our Arctic dates which now furnish tentative age ranges for Punuk, Birnirk, Kachemak Bay III, Okvik, Old Bering Sea, Ipiutak, Norton, Dorset, Kachemak Bay I, Choris, Firth River (Early Mountain Phase), Sarqaq, and Denbigh Flint Complex Periods have been submitted to American Antiquity (Rainey and Ralph, in press) along with detailed discussions of possible contaminations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 1 , 1959 , pp. 45 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Barker, H., and Mackey, C. J., 1959, British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements I: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 81–86.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C., 1934, Excavations at Tiahuanaco: Am. Mus. Nat. History Anthropol. Papers, v. 34, pt. 3.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C. 1936, Excavations in Bolivia: Am. Mus. Nat. History Anthropol. Papers, v. 35, pt. 4.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C. 1948, A revised sequence for the South Titicaca Basin, in Bennett, W. C., ed., A reappraisal of Peruvian archaeology: Soc. Am. Archaeology Mem., Supp. to Am. Antiquity, v. 13, no. 4, pt. 2, p. 90–92.Google Scholar
Burton-Brown, T., 1951, Excavations in Azarbaijan, 1948: London, John Murray, 279 p.Google Scholar
Budge, E. A. W., 1920, By Nile and Tigris, v. 2: London, John Murray, 456 p.Google Scholar
Dyson, R. H. Jr., 1958, Iran, 1957, Iron Age Hasanlu: Univ. Mus. [Philadelphia] Bull., v. 22, p. 25–32.Google Scholar
Evans, Clifford, Meggers, B. J., and Cruxent, J. M., in press, Preliminary results of archeological investigations in the Territory of Amazonas, Venezuela: Internat. Cong. Americanists, 33rd, San José, Costa Rica, 1958, Annals.Google Scholar
Fergusson, G. J., 1955, Radiocarbon dating system: Nucleonics, v. 13, no. 1 (January), p. 18–23.Google Scholar
Ghosh, A., 1954–55, 1955–56, 1958, Indian archaeology, a review: Govt. of India Dept. Archaeology, 1954–55, p. 5–9; 1955–56, p. 8–11; 1958, p. 30–31.Google Scholar
Illustrated London News, 1958, Before Mohenjo-Daro, new light on the beginnings of the Indus Valley civilisation from recent excavations at Kot Diji: v. 232, p. 866–867.Google Scholar
Khan, A. F., n.d., Preliminary report on Kot Diji excavations 1957–1958: Dept. Archaeology, Govt. of Pakistan, Ferozsons, Karachi, 20 p.Google Scholar
Kidder, Alfred II, 1943, Some early sites in the northern Lake Titicaca Basin: Peabody Mus. Archaeology and Ethnology [Harvard Univ.] Papers, v. 27, no. 1.Google Scholar
Kidder, Alfred II 1948, The position of Pucara in Titicaca Basin archaeology, in Bennett, W. C., ed., A reappraisal of Peruvian archaeology: Soc. Am. Archaeology Mem., Supp. to Am. Antiquity, v. 13, no. 4, pt. 2, p. 87–89.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1955, Radiocarbon dating, 2nd ed.: Chicago, Univ. Chicago Press, 175 p.Google Scholar
Olson, E. A., and Broecker, W. S., 1958, Sample contamination and reliability of radiocarbon dates: New York Acad. Sci. Trans., ser. 2, v. 20, p. 593–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rainey, Froelich, and Ralph, Elizabeth, in press, Radiocarbon dating in the Arctic: Am. Antiquity. Google Scholar
Ralph, E. K., 1955, University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates I: Science, v. 121, p. 149–151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sankalia, H. D., 1958, New light on the Aryan “Invasion” of India, links with the Iran of 1000 b.c. Discovered in Central India: Illus. London News, v. 233, p. 478–479.Google Scholar
Sankalia, H. D., Subbarao, B., and Deo, S. B., 1958, Excavations at Maheshwar and Navdatoli: Deccan Coll., Poona, and M. S. Univ. of Baroda, Baroda.Google Scholar
Vries, Hessel de, and Waterbolk, H. T., 1958, Groningen radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128, p. 1550–1556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Young, R. S., 1958a, The tomb of a king of Phrygia discovered intact, 2700-year-old treasures from the heart of the Great Tumulus of Gordion: Illus. London News, v. 232, p. 828–831.Google Scholar
Young, R. S. 1958b, The Gordion campaign of 1957, preliminary report: Am. Jour. Archaeology, v. 62, p. 139–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Young, R. S. 1958c, The Gordion tomb: Expedition, Bull. Univ. Mus., Univ. Pennsylvania, v. 1, p. 3–13.Google Scholar
Young, R. S. 1958d, Bronzes from Gordion's royal tomb: Archaeology, v. 11, p. 227–231.Google Scholar