Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T09:25:30.115Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

University of Michigan Radiocarbon Dates IV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

H. R. Crane  and
James B. Griffin
H. R. Crane
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
James B. Griffin
Affiliation:
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following is a list of radiocarbon dates obtained since the time of the preparation of Michigan list III.∗ The description of the essential features of our method of measurement as given in the introduction to list III applies to this list. The modern standards used were obtained from hardwood logs, and were of various ages from 75 to 150 years by ring count. These standards were sufficiently old so that no correction for the recent dilution of the atmospheric C14 is believed to be necessary in the dates reported here. The ages of carbonate sample are also calculated from modern wood as a reference standard, without any correction for isotope fractionation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 1 , 1959 , pp. 173 - 198
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Arizona I. Wise, and Shutler, , 1958 Google Scholar
Chicago I. Arnold, and Libby, , 1951 Google Scholar
Chicago III. Libby, , 1952 Google Scholar
Chicago V. Libby, , 1954 Google Scholar
Michigan I. Crane, , 1956 Google Scholar
Michigan II. Crane, and Griffin, , 1958a Google Scholar
Michigan III. Crane, and Griffin, , 1958b Google Scholar
Yale IV. Deevey, , Gralenski, , and Hoffren, , 1959 Google Scholar
Allman, J. C., 1957, A new late Woodland culture for Ohio: Ohio Archaeologist, v. 7, p. 59–68.Google Scholar
Andrews, E. W., 1959, Dzibilchaltun: lost city of the Maya: Nat. Geog. Mag., v. 115, p. 90–109.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. R., and Libby, W. F., 1951, Radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 113, p. 111–120.Google Scholar
Bank, T. P. II, 1953, Cultural succession in the Aleutians: Am. Antiquity, v. 19, no. 1, p. 40–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bank, T. P. II 1954, Archaeological field work at Unalaska, Aleutians: Alaskan Sci. Conf., 5th, Anchorage 1954, Proc., p. 94.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C., 1936, Excavations in Bolivia: Am. Mus. Nat. History Anthropol. Papers. v. 35, pt. 4, p. 329–507.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. C. 1946, The archaeology of the Central Andes. Handbook of the South American Indians, v. 2: Bur. Am. Ethnology Bull. 143, p. 61–147.Google Scholar
Broyles, Bettye, 1958, Russell Cave in northern Alabama. Tennessee Archaeol. Soc. Misc. Paper 4, 35 p.Google Scholar
Bullen, R. P., 1955, Carved owl totem, DeLand, Florida: Florida Anthropologist, v. 8, no. 3, p. 60–73.Google Scholar
Byers, D. S., 1954, Bull Broook—a fluted point site in Ipswich, Massachusetts: Am. Antiquity, v. 19, p. 343–351.Google Scholar
Byers, D. S. 1955, Additional information on the Bull Brook site, Massachusetts: Am. Antiquity, v. 20, p. 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byers, D. S. 1956, Ipswich B. C.: Essex Inst. Hist. Coll., v. 92, p. 252–264.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., 1956, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates I: Science, v 124, p. 664–672.Google Scholar
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B., 1958a, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates II: Science, v. 127, p. 1098–1105.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crane, H. R., and Griffin, J. B. 1958b, University of Michigan radiocarbon dates III: Science, v. 128. p. 1117–1123.Google Scholar
Deevey, E. S., Gralenski, L. J., and Hoffren, Väinö, 1959, Yale natural radiocarbon measurements: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 144–172.Google Scholar
Deuel, Thorne, ed., 1952, Hopewellian communities in Illinois: Illinois State Mus. Sci. Papers, v. 5, 271 p.Google Scholar
Dickson, D. F., 1956, The Liverpool Mounds: Central States Archaeol. Jour., v. 2, no. 3, p. 85–92.Google Scholar
Eldridge, W. A., and Vaccaro, Joseph, 1952, The Bull Brook Site, Ipswich, Massachusetts: Massachusetts Archaeol. Soc. Bull., v. 13, p. 39–43.Google Scholar
Estrada, V. E., 1957, Prehistoría de Manabi: Mus. Victor Emilio Estrada Pub. 4, 176 p.Google Scholar
Fox, R. B., and Evangelista, Alfredo, 1957, The Bato Caves, Sorsogon Province, Philippines; a preliminary report of a jar burial-stone tool assemblage: Univ. Manila Jour. East Asiatic Studies, v. 6, no. 1, p. 49–55.Google Scholar
Gifford, E. W., and Gifford, D. S., in press, Archaeological excavations in Yap: Univ. California Anthropol. Recs., v. 18.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B., 1958, The chronological position of the Hopewellian culture in the Eastern United States: Univ. Michigan Mus. Anthropology, Anthropol. Papers 12, 27 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthe, A. K., 1958, The Morrow site: Eastern States Archaeol. Fed. Bull. 17, p. 11.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L., 1958, Commentary on Carcajou carbon-14 dates: Wisconsin Archeologist, v. 39, no. 3, p. 174–175.Google Scholar
Hall, R. L. ms., Carcajou Point and the problem of Oneota origins: Ph.D. dissertation, University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Hamilton, H. W., 1952, The Spiro Mound. With preface and appendix by J. B. Griffin: Missouri Archaeologist, v. 14, 276 p.Google Scholar
Hartnagel, C. A., and Bishop, S. C., 1921, The mastodons, mammoths, and other Pleistocene mammals of New York State: New York State Mus. Bull., nos. 241–242, p. 7–110.Google Scholar
Haury, E. W., 1958, Two fossil elephant kill sites in the American Southwest: Univ. Arizona, Program in Geochronology, Contr. 4. Internat. Cong. Americanists, 32nd, Copenhagen 1956, Proc., p. 433–440.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F., 1949, The archaeology of central California, I: the early horizon: Univ. California Anthropol. Recs., v. 12, no. 1, iii, 74 p.Google Scholar
Heizer, R. F. 1958, Archaeological radiocarbon dates from California and Nevada: Univ. California Archaeol. Survey Repts. 44, i, 51 p.Google Scholar
Hurt, W. R., 1953, Report of the investigation of the Thomas Riggs Site, 39HU1, Hughes County, South Dakota: South Dakota Archaeol. Comm. Archaeol. Studies, Circ. 5, v. 98 p.Google Scholar
Jelinek, A. J., 1958, Archaeological materials from the Middle Pecos River Valley, New Mexico: Michigan Acad. Sci., Arts, and Letters, Papers, v. 43, p. 159–168.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. B., 1958a, The Serpent Mounds site, 1957: Royal Ontario Mus. Bull. Div. Art and Archaeology, no. 27, p. 3–7.Google Scholar
Johnston, R. B. 1958b, The findings after two years of work at Serpent Mounds site, Rice Lake, Ontario: Indiana Acad. Sci. Proc., v. 67, p. 96–97.Google Scholar
Kelly, A. R., and Larson, L. H. Jr., 1957, Explorations at Etowah Indian mounds near Cartersville, Georgia 1954–1956: Archaeology, v. 10, p. 39–48.Google Scholar
Lawrence, D. B., 1936, The submerged forest of the Columbia River Gorge: Geog. Rev., v. 26, no. 4, p. 588.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F., 1952, Chicago radiocarbon dates, III: Science, v. 116, p. 673–681.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Libby, W. F. 1954, Chicago radiocarbon dates V: Science, v. 120, p. 733–742.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1955, Radiocarbon dating, 2nd ed.: Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 175 p.Google Scholar
Miller, C. F., 1958, Russell Cave: new light on stone age life. The Nat. Geographic, v. 113, no. 3, p. 426–437.Google Scholar
Neumann, G. K., and Fowler, M. L., 1952, Hopewellian sites in the lower Wabash Valley, in Deuel, Thorne, ed., Hopewellian communities in Illinois: Illinois State Mus. Sci. Papers, v. 5, no. 5, p. 177–248.Google Scholar
Ritzenthaler, Robert, ed., 1957, The Old Copper Culture of Wisconsin: Wisconsin Archeologist, v. 38, new ser., no. 4, p. 185–332.Google Scholar
Roedl, L. J., and Howard, J. H., 1957, Archaeological investigations at the Renner Site: Missouri Archaeologist, v. 19, no. 1–2, p. 52–90.Google Scholar
Rowe, C. W., 1958, A crematorium at Aztalan: Wisconsin Archeologist, v. 39, no. 1, p. 101–110.Google Scholar
Rowe, J. H., 1949, The potter's art of Atacames: Archaeology, v. 3, no. 1, p. 31–34.Google Scholar
Sanders, W. T., 1955, An archaeological reconnaissance of northern Quintana Roo: Carnegie Inst. Washington Div. Archaeology, Current Repts., v. 2, no. 24, p. 179–222.Google Scholar
Saville, M. H., 1910, The antiquities of Manabi, Ecuador: final report: Mus. Am. Indian, Heye Foundation Pub., Contr. South Am. Archeology, v. 2.Google Scholar
Smith, H. G., 1951, The Crable Site, Fulton County, Illinois: a late prehistoric site in the central Illinois Valley: Univ. Michigan Mus. Anthropology, Anthropol. Papers 7, 53 p.Google Scholar
Taylor, Dee C., 1957, Two Fremont sites and their position in Southwestern prehistory: Univ. Utah Anthropol. Papers 29, xi, 185 p.Google Scholar
Wedel, W. R., 1943, Archeological investigations in Platte and Clay Counties, Missouri: U. S. Nat. Mus. Bull. 183, viii, 284 p.Google Scholar
Weyer, E. M. Jr., 1929, An Aleutian burial: Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. Anthropol. Papers, v. 31, pt. 3, p. 219–238.Google Scholar
Wise, E. N., and Shutler, Dick Jr., 1958, University of Arizona radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 127, p. 72–74.Google Scholar
Wormington, H. M., 1955, A reappraisal of the Fremont Culture: Denver Mus. Nat. History Proc., no. 1, 200 p.Google Scholar
Zumberge, J. H., and Potzger, J. E., 1955, Pollen profiles, radiocarbon dating, and geologic chronology of the Lake Michigan basin: Science, v. 121, p. 309–311.Google Scholar
Zumberge, J. H., and Potzger, J. E. 1956, Late Wisconsin chronology of the Lake Michigan basin correlated with pollen studies: Geol. Soc. America Bull., v. 67, p. 271–288.Google Scholar