Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T07:25:33.101Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

UCLA Radiocarbon Dates XI

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Rainer Berger  and
Reiner Protsch
Rainer Berger
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Departments of Geography and Anthropology Interdisciplinary Archaeology Graduate Program University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Reiner Protsch
Affiliation:
Institute of Geophysics, Departments of Geography and Anthropology Interdisciplinary Archaeology Graduate Program University of California, Los Angeles, California 90024
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The radiocarbon dates reported in this list are almost all based on collagen measurements from human archaeologic bone material. This collagen was isolated according to the methods developed by Berger, Horney and Libby (1964), Ho, Marcus and Berger (1969), Longin (1971) and Protsch (1973). All samples were counted as CO2 gas at close to 1 atm in a 7.5L proportional counter with three energy channels. The 14C dates reported are calculated with the Libby half-life of 5568 ± 30 years as required by convention. 13C measurements were used to normalize to −25‰ in the standard manner. The biospheric standard is 95% the count rate of NBS oxalic acid for radiocarbon laboratories. Background is based on CO2 obtained from marble. The accuracy of counter operation is checked against historically dated wood from the funerary boat of Sesostris III, 1872−8 +4 bc (Hayes, 1962). The 14C ages are not tree-ring calibrated.

Type
Date Lists
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 1 , 1989 , pp. 55 - 67
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bada, J L, Schroeder, R A, Protsch, R and Berger, R, 1974, Concordance of collagen-based radiocarbon and aspartic acid racemization ages: US Natl Acad Sci Proc, v 71, p 914–917.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berger, R, 1975, Advances and results in radiocarbon dating: Early Man in America: World Archaeology, v 7, p 174–184.Google Scholar
Berger, R, DeAtley, S, Protsch, R and Willey, G R, 1974, Radiocarbon chronology for Seibal, Guatemala: Nature, v 252, no. 5483, p 472–473.Google Scholar
Berger, R, Horney, A G and Libby, W F, 1964, Radiocarbon dating of bone and shell from their organic components: Science, v 144, p 999–1001.Google Scholar
Berger, R and Libby, W F, 1969, UCLA radiocarbon dates IX: Radiocarbon, v 11, no. 1, p 194–209.Google Scholar
Berger, R and Protsch, R, 1975, Identification of skeletal material found in a Greek hydria: J Paul Getty Mus Jour, v 1, p 23–24.Google Scholar
Berger, R, Protsch, R, Reynolds, R, Rozaire, C and Sackett, J R, 1971, New radiocarbon dates based on bone collagen of California Palaeo-Indians, in Stross, F H, ed, The application of the physical sciences to archaeology: Contr Univ California Archaeol Research Facility, v 12, p 43–49.Google Scholar
Bräuer, G, 1980, Morphologische Affinitäten des jung-Pleistozänen Stirnbeins aus dem Elbmündungsgebiet bei Hanöfersand: Zeitschr Morphol Anthropol, v 71, p 1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, M (ms), 1985, Population structure and biological variation in the Late Woodland of western central Illinois: PhD dissert, Univ Chicago.Google Scholar
Ericson, J E and Berger, R, 1974, Late Pleistocene American obsidian tools: Nature, v 249, p 824–825.Google Scholar
Hayes, W C, 1962, Chronology: Egypt-to the end of the twentieth dynasty, in Edwards, I E S, Gadd, G J and Hammond, N G L, eds, Cambridge Ancient History: Cambridge, Cambridge Univ Press, p 1–23.Google Scholar
Henke, W and Protsch, R, 1978, Die Paderborner Calvaria: ein diluvialer Homo sapiens: Anthropolo Anz, v 36, p 85–108.Google Scholar
Ho, T-Y, Marcus, L F and Berger, R, 1969, Radiocarbon dating of petroleum-impregnated bone from tar pits at Rancho La Brea, California: Science, v 164, p 1051–1052.Google Scholar
Kaufman, T S (ms) 1980, Early prehistory of the Clear Lake area, Lake County, California: PhD dissert, Univ California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Longin, R, 1971, New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating: Nature, v 230, p 241–242.Google Scholar
Meighan, C W and Haynes, C V, 1970, The Borax Lake site revisited: Science, v 167, p 1213–1221.Google Scholar
Olson, E A and Broecker, W S, 1961, Lamont natural radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v 3, p 141–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orr, P C, 1968, Prehistory of Santa Rosa Island: Santa Barbara Mus Nat Hist, Santa Barbara, California.Google Scholar
Perino, G, 1973, The Late Woodland component at the Schild sites, Greene County, Illinois, in Brown, J A, ed, Late Woodland site archaeology in Illinois, I: Illinois Archaeol Survey Bull no. 9, p 141–210.Google Scholar
Protsch, R (ms) 1973, The dating of upper Pleistocene subsaharan fossil hominids and their place in human evolution: with morphological and archaeological implications: PhD dissert, Univ California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Protsch, R (ms) 1986, Radiocarbon dating of bone, in Zimmerman, M R and Angels, J L, eds, Dating and age determination of biological material: London, Croom Helm, p 1–38.Google Scholar
Struever, S (ms) 1968, A re-examination of Hopewell in eastern North America: PhD dissert, Univ Chicago.Google Scholar
Taylor, R E, Payne, L A, Prior, C A, Slota, P J Jr, Gillespie, R, Gowlett, J A J, Hedges, R E B, Jull, A J T, Zabel, T H, Donahue, D J and Berger, R, 1985, Major revisions in the Pleistocene age assignments for North American human skeletons by 14C accelerator mass spectrometry: Am Antiquity, v 50, p 136–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar