Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T03:53:40.462Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies of Non-Marine Mollusks for the Selection of Shell Samples for Radiocarbon Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Timothy Yates
Timothy Yates*
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University College London, Bedford Way London WC1H OAP, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

14C dating of shells from terrestrial and freshwater mollusks is prone to distortion by post-depositional diagenesis as well as incorporation of material depleted in 14C while the mollusk was alive. Three types of diagenetic change can result: etching, the development of surface crusts, and replacement of aragonite by calcite. Inspection under the light microscope, x-ray diffraction, and scanning electron microscope make it possible to assess the relative importance of the changes. When they are confined to the surface, mechanical cleaning combined with judicious leaching can reduce them to <1% of the total sample. The corresponding errors, which can now be specified, are often no greater than those associated with the statistics of counting.

Type
IV. Methods and Applications
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 28 , Issue 2A , 1986 , pp. 457 - 463
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Alexandersson, E T, 1978, Destructive diagenesis of carbonate sediments in the eastern Skagerrak, North Sea: Geology, v 6, p 324–327.Google Scholar
Callen, R A, Wasson, R J and Gillespie, R, 1983, Reliability of radiocarbon dating of pedogenic carbonate in the Australian arid zone: Sed Geol, v 35, p 1–14.Google Scholar
Evans, J G, 1972, Land snails in archaeology: London and New York, Seminar Press.Google Scholar
Evin, J, Marechal, J, Pachiaudi, C and Puissegur, J J, 1980, Conditions involved in dating terrestrial shells, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 2, p 545–555.Google Scholar
Gavish, E and Friedman, G M, 1969, Progressive diagenesis in Quaternary to Late Tertiary carbonate sediments: Sequence and time scale: Jour Sed Petrol, v 39, no. 3, p 980–1006.Google Scholar
Gillespie, R and Polach, H A, 1979, The suitability of marine shells for radiocarbon dating of Australian prehistory, in Berger, R and Suess, H E, eds, Radiocarbon dating, Internatl 14C conf, 9th, Proc: Berkeley, Univ California Press, p 404–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacClintock, C, 1967, Shell structures of patelloid and bellerophontoid gastropods (Mollusca): Peabody Mus Nat Hist Bull, v 22, p 1–140.Google Scholar
Mackie, G L, 1978, Electron microscopy of Pisodiiae: Can Jour Zool, v 56, no. 1, p 1–6.Google Scholar
Mangerud, J, 1972, Radiocarbon dating of marine shells, including a discussion of apparent age of Recent shells from Norway: Boreas, v 1, no. 2, p 143–172.Google Scholar
Olsson, I U, Göksu, Y and Stenberg, A, 1968, Further investigations of storing and treatment of Foraminifera and mollusks for 14C dating: Geol Fören Stockholm Förh, v 90, p 417–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillipon, J, 1974, Structure et composition mineralogique de la coquille de Gastropodes actucls et fossiles: Notes Contr Cent Etudies Recherche Paleontol Biostrat, v 7, p 1–84.Google Scholar
Pingitore, N E, 1976, Vadose and Phreatic diagenesis: Processes, products and their recognition in corals: Jour Sed Petrol, v 46 p 985–1006.Google Scholar
Pingitore, N E 1982, The role of diffusion during carbonate diagenesis: Jour Sed Petrol, v 52, p 27–39.Google Scholar
Saleuddin, A S M, 1971, Fine structures of normal and regenerated shell of Helix : Can Jour Zool, v 49, p 37–41.Google Scholar
Taylor, J D, Kennedy, W J and Hall, A, 1969, The shell structure and mineralogy of the Bivalvia. I. Introduction. Nuculacea-Trigonacea: Bull British Mus (Nat Hist) Zool, Supp 3, p 1–125.Google Scholar
Thorpe, P M, Otlet, R L and Sweeting, M M, 1980, Hydrological implications from 14C profiling of UK tufa, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 897–908.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C, 1980, 14C dating of recent crustal movements in the Persian Gulf and Iranian Makran, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, no. 3, p 763–773.Google Scholar
Vita-Finzi, C and Roberts, N, 1984, Selective leaching of shells for 14C dating: Radiocarbon, v 26, no. 1, p 54–58.Google Scholar
Walker, B M, 1979, Shell dissolution: Destructive diagenesis in a meteoric environment: Scanning Electron Microscopy, no. 2, p 463–468.Google Scholar