Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:22:11.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Speed Dating: A Rapid Way to Determine the Radiocarbon Age of Wood by EA-AMS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2016

Adam Sookdeo ,
Lukas Wacker ,
Simon Fahrni ,
Cameron P McIntyre ,
Michael Friedrich ,
Frederick Reinig ,
Daniel Nievergelt ,
Willy Tegel ,
Bernd Kromer  and
Ulf Büntgen
Adam Sookdeo*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH-Zürich, Physics, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, Zürich 8093Switzerland Carbon Cycle Biogeoscience, ETH-Zurich, Earth Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
Lukas Wacker
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH-Zürich, Physics, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, Zürich 8093Switzerland
Simon Fahrni
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH-Zürich, Physics, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, Zürich 8093Switzerland
Cameron P McIntyre
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, ETH-Zürich, Physics, Otto-Stern-Weg 5, Zürich 8093Switzerland Carbon Cycle Biogeoscience, ETH-Zurich, Earth Sciences, Zürich, Switzerland
Michael Friedrich
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University, Envrionmental Physics, Heidelberg, Germany Universitat Hohenheim, Botany, Stuttgart., Baden-Wurttemborg, Germany
Frederick Reinig
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Institution WSL, Dendroecology, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Daniel Nievergelt
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Institution WSL, Dendroecology, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
Willy Tegel
Affiliation:
Albert-Ludwigs University Freiburg, Chair of Forest Growth and Dendroecology, Freiburg, Germany
Bernd Kromer
Affiliation:
Heidelberg University, Envrionmental Physics, Heidelberg, Germany
Ulf Büntgen
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Research Institution WSL, Dendroecology, Birmensdorf, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon measurements in tree rings can be used to estimate atmospheric 14C concentration and thereby used to create a 14C calibration curve. When wood is discovered in construction sites, rivers, buildings, and lake sediments, it is unclear if the wood could fill gaps in the 14C calibration curve or if the wood is of historical interest until the age is determined by dendrochronology or 14C dating. However, dendrochronological dating is subjected to many requirements and 14C dating is costly and time consuming, both of which can be frivolous endeavors if the samples are not in the age range of interest. A simplified 14C dating technique, called Speed Dating, was thus developed. It can be used to quickly obtain 14C ages as wood samples are neither chemically treated nor graphitized. Instead, wood is combusted in an elemental analyzer (EA) and the CO2 produced is carried into an accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) with a gas ion source. Within a day, 75 samples can be measured with uncertainties between 0.5–2% depending on the age, preservation, and contaminants on the material and Speed Dating costs about one-third of conventional AMS dates.

Keywords

14CAMS datingSpeed DatingMICADAS
Type
Advances in Physical Measurement Techniques
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 3: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 2 of 2) , June 2017 , pp. 933 - 939
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Brock, F, Higham, T, Ditchfield, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2010. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 52(1):103–112.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Ditchfield, P, Humm, M. 2004. Using a gas ion source for radiocarbon AMS and GC-AMS. Radiocarbon 46(1):25–32.Google Scholar
Calcagnile, L, Quarta, G, D’Elia, M. 2005. High-resolution accelerator-based mass spectrometry: precision, accuracy and background. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 62(4):623–629.Google Scholar
Cook, ER, Kairiukstis, LA. 2013. Methods of Dendrochronology: Applications in the Environmental Sciences. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Fahrni, SM, Wacker, L, Synal, HA, Szidat, S. 2013. Improving a gas ion source for 14C AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294(1):320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fifield, LK. 1999. Accelerator mass spectrometry and its applications. Reports on Progress in Physics 62(8):1223–1274.Google Scholar
Friedrich, M, Remmele, S, Kromer, B, Hofmann, J, Spurk, M, Kaiser, KF, Orcel, C, Küppers, M. 2004. The 12,460-year Hohenheim oak and pine tree-ring chronology from central Europe—a unique annual record for radiocarbon calibration and paleoenvironment reconstructions. Radiocarbon 46(3):1111–1122.Google Scholar
Gaudinski, JB, Dawson, TE, Quideau, S, Schuur, EA, Roden, JS, Trumbore, SE, Sandquist, DR, Oh, SW, Wasylishen, RE. 2005. Comparative analysis of cellulose preparation techniques for use with 13C, 14C, and 18O isotopic measurements. Analytical Chemistry 77(22):7212–7224.Google Scholar
Hogg, AG, Hua, Q, Blackwell, PG, Niu, M, Buck, CE, Guilderson, TP, Heaton, TJ, Palmer, JG, Reimer, PJ, Reimer, RW, Turney, CSM, Zimmerman, SRH. 2013. SHCal13 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 50,000 years cal BP. Radicarbon 55(4):1889–1903.Google Scholar
Hoper, ST, McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Head, MJ. 1998. Evaluation of wood pretreatments on oak and cedar. Radiocarbon 40(1):45–50.Google Scholar
Kaiser, KF, Friedrich, M, Miramont, C, Kromer, B, Sgier, M, Schaub, M, Boeren, I, Remmele, S, Talamo, S, Guibal, F, Sivan, O. 2012. Challenging process to make the Lateglacial tree-ring chronologies from Europe absolute–an inventory. Quaternary Science Reviews 12(36):78–90.Google Scholar
Kieser, WE, Leung, K, Krestina, N, Zhao, XL, Litherland, AE, Cornett, J. 2010. Development and testing of an integrated combustion and gas ion source system for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7):784–786.Google Scholar
Němec, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, H. 2010. Optimization of the automated graphitization system AGE-1. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1380–1393.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV. Radiocarbon 49(2):307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, M, Fahrni, S, Gäggeler, HW, Hajdas, I, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S, Wacker, L. 2010. Online radiocarbon measurements of small samples using elemental analyzer and MICADAS gas ion source. Radiocarbon 52(4):1645–1656.Google Scholar
Salazar, G, Zhang, YL, Agrios, K, Szidat, S. 2015. Development of a method for fast and automatic radiocarbon measurement of aerosol samples by online coupling of an elemental analyzer with a MICADAS AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361(1):163–167.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A. 2013. Developments in accelerator mass spectrometry. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 349(1):192–202.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2007. MICADAS: a new compact radiocarbon AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):7–13.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass-spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010a. A revolutionary graphitisation system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7):931–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Bonani, G, Friedrich, M, Hajdas, I, Kromer, B, Němec, M, Ruff, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Vockenhuber, C. 2010b. MICADAS: routine and high-precision radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 52(3):252–262.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, H-A. 2010c. Bats: a new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7):976–979.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Fahrni, SM, Hajdas, I, Molnar, M, Synal, HA, Szidat, S, Zhang, YL. 2013. A versatile gas interface for routine radiocarbon analysis with a gas ion source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294(1):315–319.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Güttler, D, Goll, J, Hurni, JP, Synal, H-A, Walti, N. 2014. Radiocarbon dating to a single year by means of rapid atmospheric 14C changes. Radiocarbon 56(2):573–579.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–329.Google Scholar