Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:21:38.123Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sources and Transformation of Dissolved Organic Carbon in the Harp Lake Forested Catchment: The Role of Soils

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

S. E. Trumbore
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore California 94550 USA
S. L. Schiff
Affiliation:
Center for Groundwater Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 3E6 Canada
Ramon Aravena
Affiliation:
Center for Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore California 94550 USA
Richard Elgood
Affiliation:
Center for Groundwater Research, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 3E6 Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The 14C content of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in streams, soil water and groundwaters in the Harp Lake catchment in Ontario, Canada, reflect a mixture of DOC sources, including both contemporary plant material and 14C-depleted soil organic matter. The concentration and isotopic content of DOC in streams is highly variable, reflecting the complex flow path of the source water entering the streams. The characteristics of groundwater DOC are set in the soil column, either through DOC production in the deeper soil layers, or through preferential decomposition and/or sorption of 14C-enriched DOC components from percolating waters. We estimate the relative magnitudes of decomposition, transport and sorption as sinks for DOC produced in forested catchment soils.

Type
II. Applied Isotope Geochemistry
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Aravena, R. and Schiff, S. L. 1991 C02 production and carbon cycling in Precambrian Shield watersheds. In Proceedings of Environmental Research: 1991 Technology Transfer Conference, Environment Ontario: 2230.Google Scholar
Aravena, R. Schiff, S. L., Trumbore, S. E., Dillon, P. J. and Elgood, R. 1992 Evaluating dissolved inorganic carbon cycling in a forested lake watershed using carbon isotopes. Radiocarbon, this issue.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bottomley, D. J., Craig, D. and Johnston, L. M. 1984 Neutralization of acid runoff by groundwater discharge to streams in Canadian Precambrian Shield watersheds. Journal of Hydrology 75: 126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutton, T. W., Wong, W. W., Hachey, D. L., Lee, L. S., Cabrera, M. P. and Klein, P. D. 1983 Comparison son of quartz and pyrex tubes for combustion of organic samples for stable carbon isotope analysis. Analytical Chemistry 55: 18321833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, N. C. 1983 The Nature and Properties of Soils. New York, Macmillan Publishing Company: 434463.Google Scholar
Chandler, R. F. 1942 The time required for Podzol profile formation as evidenced by the Mendenhall Glacial deposits near Juneau, Alaska. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings 7: 454458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronan, C. S. 1985 Comparative effects of precipitation acidity on three forest soils. Carbon cycling responses. Plant Soil 88: 101112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dankevy, S. N., Schiff, S. L., English, M. C. and Dillon, P. J. 1990 Groundwater flow and chemistry in a small acid-stressed subcatchment in the Canadian Shield. In Proceedings of the NHRI Symposium on Groundwater Contamination. National Hydrologic Research Institute, Environment Canada, Saskatoon, Canada, in press.Google Scholar
Davis, J. C., Proctor, I. D., Southon, J. R., Caffee, M. W., Heikkinen, D. W., Roberts, M. L., Moore, T. L., Turteltaub, K. W., Nelson, D. E., Loyd, D. H. and Vogel, J. S. 1990 LLNL/UC AMS facility and research program. In Yiou, F. and Raisbeck, G. M., eds., Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods B52: 269272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dawson, H. J., Ugolini, F. C. and Fasth, W. S. 1978 Role of soluble organics in the soil processes of a podzol, central Cascades, Washington. Soil Science 126: 290296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiebig, D. M., Lock, M. A. and Neal, C. 1990 Soil water in the riparian zone as a source of carbon for a headwater stream. Journal of Hydrology 116: 217237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinton, M. J., English, M. C. and Schiff, S. L. 1991 Tracing groundwater flow pathways in a head-water catchment and evaluating the implications for acidic precipitation research. Abstract. International Conference on Acidic Deposition: Its Nature and Impacts. Glasgow, Scotland: 379.Google Scholar
Jardine, P. M., Weber, N. L. and McCarthy, J. F. 1989 Mechanisms of dissolved organic carbon adsorption on soil. Soil Science Society of America Journal 53: 13781385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keller, C. K. 1991 Hydrogeochemistry of a clayey till, 2. Sources of CO2 . Water Resources Research 27: 25552564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LaZerte, B. D. and Dillon, P. J. 1984 Relative importance of anthropogenic versus natural sources of acidity in lakes and streams of Central Ontario. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41: 16641677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, E. M., Davis, S. N., Long, A., Donahue, D. and Jull, A. J. T. 1989 Characterization and isotopic composition of organic and inorganic carbon in the Milk River Aquifer. Water Resources Research 25: 18931905.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadelhoffer, K. J. and Fry, B. 1988 Controls on natural Nitrogen-15 and Carbon-13 abundances in forest soil organic matter. Soil Science Society of America Journal 52: 16331640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nodvin, S. C., Driscoll, C. T. and Likens, G. E. 1986 Simple partitioning of anions and dissolved organic carbon in a forest soil. Soil Science 142: 2735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reiners, W. A. 1973 Terrestrial detritus and the carbon cycle. In Woodwell, G. M. and Pecan, E. V., eds., Proceedings of the 24th Brookhaven Symposium in Biology, Upton, NY. Atomic Energy Commission Symposium Series 30: 303327.Google Scholar
Schiff, S. L., Aravena, R., Trumbore, S. E. and Dillon, P. J. 1990 Dissolved organic carbon cycling in forested watersheds: A carbon isotope approach. Water Resources Research 26: 29492957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevenson, F. J. 1982 Humus Chemistry: Genesis, Composition, Reactions. Somerset, New Jersey, John Wiley & Sons, Inc: Chapter 1.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbore, S. E., Bonani, G. and Wölfli, W. 1990 The rates of carbon cycling in several soils from AMS 14C measurements of fractionated soil organic matter. In Bouwman, A. F., ed., Soils and the Greenhouse Effect, Chichester, UK, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: 405414.Google Scholar
Vance, G. F. and David, M. B. 1991 Forest soil response to acid and salt additions of sulfate: III. Solubilization and composition of dissolved organic carbon. Soil Science 151: 297305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. S., Nelson, D. E. and Southon, J. R. 1987 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29(3): 323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassenaar, L. I., Aravena, R., Fritz, P. and Barker, J. F. 1991a Controls on the transport and carbon isotopic composition of dissolved organic carbon in a shallow groundwater system, Central Ontario. Chemical Geology 87: 3957.Google Scholar
Wassenaar, L. I., Aravena, R., Hendry, M. J. and Fritz, P. 1991b Radiocarbon in dissolved organic carbon – a potential groundwater dating method: Case studies from western Canada. Water Resources Research 27: 19751986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wassenaar, L. I., Hendry, M. J., Aravena, R. and Fritz, P. 1990 Organic carbon isotope geochemistry of clayey deposits and their associated porewaters, Southern Alberta. Journal of Hydrology 120: 251270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zinke, P. J. Stangenberger, A. G., Post, W. M., Emanual, W. R. and Olson, J. S. 1984 Worldwide organic soil carbon and nitrogen data. Environmental Science Division Publication 2212. Oak Ridge National Laboratory: 141 p.Google Scholar