Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:39:59.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Solar Activity and Regional Climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M G Ogurtsov ,
G E Kocharov ,
M Lindholm ,
M Eronen  and
Yu A Nagovitsyn
M G Ogurtsov
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194021, Polytechnicheskaya 26, St.-Petersburg, Russia. Email: [email protected].
G E Kocharov
Affiliation:
A.F. Ioffe Physico-Technical Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 194021, Polytechnicheskaya 26, St.-Petersburg, Russia. Email: [email protected].
M Lindholm
Affiliation:
Saima Center for Environmental Sciences, Linnankatu 11, FIN-57130 Savonlinna, Finland
M Eronen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki, Department of Geology, POB 11, FIN-00014, Helsinki, Finland
Yu A Nagovitsyn
Affiliation:
Central Astronomy Observatory, Pulkovo, 196140, St.-Petersburg, M-140, Russia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We performed a statistical analysis of the data on summer temperature anomalies in northern Fennoscandia (8–1995 AD) and found that a 70–130-yr cycle is present in this series during most of the time period. A comparison of the reconstructed northern Fennoscandia temperature with different indicators of solar activity (Wolf numbers, the length of solar Schwabe cycle, extended bi-decadal radiocarbon series, and data on sunspots observed by naked eye) shows that the more probable cause of the periodicity is the modulation of regional northern Fennoscandia climate by the long-term solar cycle of Gleissberg. The effect of this century-scale solar modulation of the global Northern Hemisphere temperature is weaker.

Type
II. Getting More from the Data
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 43 , Issue 2A: Proceedings of the 17th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 3) , 2001 , pp. 439 - 447
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Astafieva, NM. 1996. Wavelet analyses: basic theory and some applications. UFN 166:1145–70. In Russian.Google Scholar
Beer, J, Soos, F, Lukachyk, Ch. 1994. 10Be as an indicator of solar variability and climate. In: Nesme-Ribes, E, editor. The solar engine and its influence on terrestrial atmosphere and climate. NATO ASI Series 25:221–33.Google Scholar
Beer, J, Mende, W, Stellmacher, R. 2000. The role of the sun in climate forcing. Quaternary Science Reviews 19:403–15.Google Scholar
Damon, PA, Sonett, CP. 1991. Solar and terrestrial components of 14C spectrum. In: Sonett, CP, Giampapa, MS, Mattheus, MS, editors. The Sun in time. p 360–88.Google Scholar
Damon, PA, Peristykh, AN. 1999. Solar cycle length and 20th century Northern Hemisphere warming. Geophys. Research Letters 26:2469–247.Google Scholar
Damon, PA, Peristykh, AN. 2000. Radiocarbon calibration and application to geophysics, solar physics, and astrophysics. Radiocarbon 42(1): 137–50.Google Scholar
Dergachev, VA, Veksler, VS. 1990. Application of radiocarbon method for the investigation of past nature. Leningrad. 255 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Friis-Christensen, E, Lassen, K. 1991. Length of the solar cycle an indicator of solar activity closely associated with climate. Science 254:698–700.Google Scholar
Frohlich, C, Lean, J. 1997. Total solar irradiance variations. In: Deubner, FL, editor. IAU symposium 185: new eyes to see inside the sun and stars. Kyoto: Kluwer Academic Publications.Google Scholar
Gierens, K, Ponater, M. 1999. Comment on “Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage - a missing link in solar-climate relationship” by Svensmark, H and Friis-Christiensen, E (1997). Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 61:795–7.Google Scholar
Gleissberg, W. 1944. Terr. Mag. 49:243–4.Google Scholar
Grossman, A, Morlet, J. 1984. Decomposition of hardy functions into square integrable wavelets of constant shape. SIAM J. Math. Anal. 15:723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoit, DV, Schatten, KH. 1997. The role of the sun in climate change. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, TS, Hansen, AW. 2000. Comment on “Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage - a missing link in solar-climate relationship” by Svensmark, H and Friis-Christiensen, E Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 62:73–7.Google Scholar
Kocharov, GE, Ostryakov, VM, Chernov, SS. 1981. Five reservoir model of carbon exchange cycle and some astrophysical phenomena. PTI Preprint-739. 26 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Lindholm, M, Eronen, M. 2000. A reconstruction of midsummer temperatures from ring-widths of Scots pine since A.D. 50 in northern Fennoscandia. Geografisca Annaler, Series A. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mallatt, SG. 1989. Multiresolution approximations and wavelet orthonormal bases of L2(R). Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 315:69.Google Scholar
Mann, ME, Bradley, RS, Hughes, MK. 1999. Northern Hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophys. Res. Letters 26(6):759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, JM, Stockton, CV, Meko, DM. 1979. McCormac, BM, Seliga, T, editors. Solar-terrestrial connections, weather and climate. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co. p 125–43.Google Scholar
Monin, AS. 1969. Weather forecast as the problem of physics. Moscow: Nauka. In Russian.Google Scholar
Nagovitsyn, YuA. 2001. The Sun's activity for two last millennia A.D.: “solar monitoring” in the ancient and medieval China. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Pittock, AB. 1978. A critical look at long-term sun-weather relationship. Rev. Geoph. and Space Physics 16:400–20.Google Scholar
Persival, DB. 1995. On estimation of the wavelet variance. Biometrika 82:619–31.Google Scholar
Pudovkin, MI, Veretenenko, SV. 1996. Variations of the cosmic rays as one of the possible link between the solar activity and the lower atmosphere. Advances in Space Research 17:161–4.Google Scholar
Shindell, D, Rind, D, Balachandran, N et al. 1999. Solar cycle variability, ozone and climate. Science 284:305–8.Google Scholar
Schove, DJ. 1983. Sunspot cycles. Stroudsburg: Hutchinson Ross.Google Scholar
Svensmark, H, Friis-Christiensen, E. 1997. Variation of cosmic ray flux and global cloud coverage - a missing link in solar-climate relationship. Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics 59:1225–32.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Braziunas, TF, Becker, B, Kromer, B. 1991. Climatic, solar, oceanic and geomagnetic influences on late-glacial and holocene atmospheric 14C/12C changes. Quaternary Research 35:124.Google Scholar
Tinsley, BA, Heelis, RA. 1993. J. Geophys. Res. 98(D6): 10,375.Google Scholar
Torrence, C, Compo, GP. 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analyses. Bulletin of American Meteorological Society 79:61–78.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veretenenko, SI, Pudovkin, MI. 1993. Geomagnetism and Aeronomy 33(6):35.Google Scholar
Ulikh, T. 1996. The varying length of the solar cycle as determined by different methods [MSc thesis]. University of Oulu, Finland.Google Scholar
Waldmeier, M. 1961. The sunspot activity in the years 1610–1960. Zurikh: Schulthess and Company AG.Google Scholar
Wittmann, AD, Xu, Z. 1987. A catalogue of sunspot observations from 165 BC to AD 1684. Astr. Astroph. Suppl. Ser. 70(1):83–94.Google Scholar