Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T06:33:23.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Simple and Effective Removal Procedure of Synthetic Resins to Obtain Accurate Radiocarbon Dates of Restored Artworks

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2016

M E Fedi*
Affiliation:
INFN Sezione di Firenze, via Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy
L Caforio
Affiliation:
INFN Sezione di Firenze, via Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Università di Firenze, via Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy
P A Mandò*
Affiliation:
INFN Sezione di Firenze, via Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy
A Salvini
Affiliation:
Dipartimento di Chimica Ugo Schiff, Università di Firenze, via della Lastruccia 3–13, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy
F Taccetti
Affiliation:
INFN Sezione di Firenze, via Sansone 1, 50019 Sesto Fiorentino (Fi), Italy
*
2. Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
2. Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].

Abstract

The issue of contamination in radiocarbon dating is well known and can affect not only archaeological findings but also artworks. In the latter case, a possible source of contamination is represented by the products used during the restoration, e.g. resins of synthetic origin like the well-known Paraloid, applied to wood artifacts as a strengthening and preserving agent. In the case of incomplete removal prior to dating, the resins produce an apparent aging of the samples. Mechanical cleaning using traditional tools and the standard pretreatment acid-base-acid (ABA) protocol are not sufficient to remove such contaminants, while the use of organic solvents, in particular petroleum solvents and chlorine-based products, can be effective. However, the most widely used protocol, based on the Soxhlet extraction system, is very time consuming. Here, in the presence of chloroform-soluble applied products, like the widespread Paraloid B-72, this study proposes the use of a new easily operated pretreatment procedure, developed at INFN-LABEC in Florence, based on the use of chloroform (CHCl3) as solvent and on a simple extraction. First, the effectiveness of this procedure was checked by applying it to remove the resin from wood samples of known age, which had been previously intentionally contaminated by applying large quantities of Paraloid. 14C AMS measurements performed on the test samples before and after contamination and application of the proposed procedure proved its effectiveness for removal, while this was not the case when applying standard ABA protocols. Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy analyses also were used to check the removal of contaminants. The new procedure was applied in two case studies: the wood frame of an altar piece from the Renaissance and a painting on canvas from the early 20th century. For both artworks, the use of synthetic resins was documented in restorations performed a relatively long time ago: the wood frame was restored using just Paraloid, the canvas using a thermoplastic polymer soluble in chloroform. Enough time elapsed for the resins to create cross-linking bonds with the original material. Despite this, the results obtained by 14C AMS dating confirm the reliability of the new chloroform-based pretreatment in removing the contaminations. Also in these cases, spectroscopic techniques were used to compare the effectiveness of the ABA and the new treatments in removing the contaminants.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2014 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berger, GA, Russell, WH. 2000. Conservation of Paintings: Research and Innovations. London: Archetype Publications.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–60.Google Scholar
Bruhn, F, Duhr, A, Grootes, PM, Mintrop, A, Nadeau, M-J. 2001. Chemical removal of conservation substances by ‘Soxhlet’-type extraction. Radiocarbon 43(2A):229–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caforio, L, Fedi, ME, Liccioli, L, Salvini, A. 2013. The issue of contamination by synthetic resins in radiocarbon dating: the case of a painting by Ambrogio Lorenzetti. Procedia Chemistry 8:2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carretti, E, Dei, L. 2004. Physicochemical characterization of acrylic polymeric resins coating porous materials of artistic interest. Progress in Organic Coatings 49(3):282–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, S, Mason, D. 2003. Literature review: the use of Paraloid B-72 as a surface consolidant for stained glass. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 42(2):381–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciatti, M, Gusmeroli, L, editors. 2012. Ambrogio Lorenzetti: il Trittico di Badia a Rofeno. Studi, rastauro e ricollocazione. Florence: Edifir – Edizioni Firenze.Google Scholar
Crisci, GM, La Russa, MF, Malagodi, M, Ruffolo, SA. 2010. Consolidating properties of Regalrez 1126 and Paraloid B72 applied to wood. Journal of Cultural Heritage 11(3):304–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Damon, PE, Donahue, DJ, Gore, BH, Hatheway, AL, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Sercel, PJ, Toolin, LJ, Bronk, CR, Hall, ET, Hedges, REM, Housley, R, Law, IA, Perry, C, Bonani, G, Trumbore, S, Woelfli, W, Ambers, JC, Bowman, SGE, Leese, MN, Tite, MS. 1989. Radiocarbon dating of the Shroud of Turin. Nature 337(6208):611–5.Google Scholar
Derrick, MR, Stulik, D, Landry, JM. 1999. Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science. Los Angeles: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Faix, O. 1991. Classification of lignins from different botanical origins by FT-IR spectroscopy. Holzforschung 45(Supplement):21–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fedi, ME, Cartocci, A, Manetti, M, Taccetti, F, Mandò, PA. 2007. The 14C AMS facility at LABEC, Florence. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):1822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, R, Baglioni, M, Berti, D, Baglioni, P. 2010. New methodologies for the conservation of cultural heritage: micellar solutions, microemulsions, and hydroxide nanoparticles. Accounts of Chemical Research 43(6):694704.Google Scholar
Hameed, F, Schillinger, B, Rohatsch, A, Zawisky, M, Rauch, H. 2009. Investigation of stone consolidants by neutron imaging. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 605(1–2):150–3.Google Scholar
Horie, V. 2010. Materials for Conservation. Organic Consolidants, Adhesives and Coatings. 2nd edition. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellusb.v65i0.20092.Google Scholar
Mariotti Lippi, M, Bellini, C, Benvenuti, M, Fedi, ME. 2011. Palaeoenvironmental signals in ancient urban settings: the heavy rainfall record in Sumhuram, a pre-Islamic archaeological site of Dhofar (S Oman). The Holocene 21(6):951–65.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Edwards, RL, Friedrich, M, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Hajdas, I, Heaton, TJ, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, McCormac, FG, Manning, SW, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Southon, JR, Talamo, S, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2009. IntCal09 and Marine09 radiocarbon age calibration curves, 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 51(4):1111–50.Google Scholar
Satta, A, Hagege, R, Sotton, M. 1986. Relation entre la structure et le comportement de la fibre elementaire de lin. Bulletin scientifique de l'Institut Textile de France 15:314.Google Scholar
Schwanninger, M, Rodrigues, JC, Pereira, H, Hinterstoisser, B. 2004. Effects of short-time vibratory ball milling on the shape of FT-IR spectra of wood and cellulose. Vibrational Spectroscopy 36.(1)2340.Google Scholar
Zhang, A-P, Liu, C-F, Sun, R-C. 2010. Fractional isolation and characterization of lignin and hemicelluloses from Triploid of Populus tomentosa Carr. Industrial Crops and Products 31(2):357–62.Google Scholar