Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-wpx69 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-13T15:55:52.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Shifts in 14C Patterns of Soil Profiles Due to Bomb Carbon, Including Effects of Morphogenetic and Turbation Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Hans-Wilhelm Scharpenseel  and
Peter Becker-Heidmann
Hans-Wilhelm Scharpenseel
Affiliation:
Institut für Bodenkunde Universität Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
Peter Becker-Heidmann
Affiliation:
Institut für Bodenkunde Universität Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Principles contributing to changes and the final balance of rejuvenation in 14C dates of soil profiles are identified. The annual addition to the atmosphere of ca 5.5·1012kg of dead carbon from fossil carbon sources and 1.5·1012kg of older carbon from forest clearing make soil appear older. Bomb carbon and annual recycling of most of the 115·1012kg of terrestrial organic carbon, equivalent to the annual photosynthetic turnover of carbon, rejuvenates soil dates. This also applies to root growth, animal transport, and in acid or alkaline soils, to humus percolation. All available 14C dates of soil profiles were evaluated for the impact of bomb carbon. We also studied the effects of morphogenetic soil-forming processes, such as turbations, on soil rejuvenation. Bioturbation, as a general principle of soil dynamics, requires more differential treatment due to modern and bomb carbon that constitutes body carbon of earthworms as well as steadily increasing 14C age with depth in all Mollisols.

Type
II. Carbon Cycle in the Environment
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 31 , Issue 3: June 20-25, 1988 Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia , 1989 , pp. 627 - 636
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Becker-Heidmann, P and Scharpenseel, H W, 1986, Thin layer δ13C and D14C monitoring of “Lessivé” soil profiles, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2A, p 383–390.Google Scholar
Becker-Heidmann, P and Scharpenseel, H W, 1989, Carbon isotope dynamics in some tropical soils: Radiocarbon, this issue.Google Scholar
Freytag, J, 1985, Das δ13C/12C – Isotopenverhältnis als aussagefähiger Bodenparameter, untersucht an tunesischen Kalkkrusten und sudanesischen Vertisolprofilen: Hamburger Bodenkd Arbeiten, v 3.Google Scholar
Jenkinson, D S and Ayanaba, A, 1977, Decomposition of carbon 14 labeled plant material under tropical conditions: Soil Sci Soc America Jour, v 41, p 912–915.Google Scholar
Neue, H U and Scharpenseel, H W, 1987, Decomposition pattern of 14C-labeled rice straw in aerobic and submerged rice soils of the Philippines: Science of the Total Environment, v 62, p 431–434.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H W, Freytag, J and Becker-Heidmann, P, 1986, C-14-Altersbestimmungen und δ13C-Messungen and Vertisolen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Geziraböden des Sudan: Zeitschr Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd, v 149, p 277–289.Google Scholar
Scharpenseel, H W, Tsutsuki, K, Becker-Heidmann, P and Freytag, J, 1986, Untersuchungen zur Kohlenstoffdynamik und Bioturbation von Mollisolen: Zeitschr Pflanzenernaehr Bodenkd, v 149, p 582–597.Google Scholar
Taxonomy, Soil, 1975, A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys: US Dept Agric handbook no. 436, US Govt Printing Office, Washington DC.Google Scholar
Tans, P, 1981, A compilation of bomb 14C data for use in global carbon model calculations, in Bolin, B, ed, Carbon cycle modelling, SCOPE 16: Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, p 131–157.Google Scholar