Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-09T03:43:19.599Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reply to Israel Carmi (2002): “Are the 14C Dates of the Dead Sea Scrolls Affected by Castor Oil Contamination?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Kaare L Rasmussen ,
Johannes van der Plicht ,
Gregory Doudna ,
Frank M Cross  and
John Strugnell
Kaare L Rasmussen*
Affiliation:
Chemistry Department, University of Southern Denmark, Campusvej 55, DK-5230 Odense M, Denmark.
Johannes van der Plicht
Affiliation:
Centrum voor Isotopen Onderzoek, Nijenborgh 4, 9747 AG Groningen, The Netherlands.
Gregory Doudna
Affiliation:
The Danish Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, Vimmelskaftet 41A, 2, Copenhagen K, DK-1161, Denmark.
Frank M Cross
Affiliation:
Department of Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations, Harvard University, 6 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, Massachu setts 02138, USA.
John Strugnell
Affiliation:
The Divinity School, Harvard University, 45 Francis Street, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA.
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Carmi (2002) is a response to our study published in Radiocarbon 43(1) by Rasmussen et al. (2001). We noted widespread possible exposure to castor oil of the Dead Sea Scrolls (DSS) in the Rockefeller Museum in the 1950s and reported experiments showing that the AAA pretreatment used in the first 2 series of radiocarbon datings of the DSS (Bonani et al. [1992] and Jull et al. [1995]), “cannot be guaranteed to have removed all of the modern carbon in any samples if they had been contaminated with castor oil and hence could have produced some 14C dates that were younger than the texts' true ages.” Carmi, a coauthor of the Bonani et al. (1992) study, criticizes our analysis on 4 grounds:

Type
Notes & Comments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 45 , Issue 3 , 2003 , pp. 497 - 499
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bonani, G, Ivy, S, Wölfli, W, Broshi, M, Carmi, I, Strugnell, J. 1992. Radiocarbon dating of fourteen Dead Sea Scrolls. Radiocarbon 34(3):843–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmi, I. 2002. Are the 14C dates of the Dead Sea Scrolls affected by castor oil contamination? Radiocarbon 44(1):213–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donahue, DJ, Olin, JS, Harbottle, G. 2002. Determination of the radiocarbon age of parchment of the Vinland Map. Radiocarbon 44(1):45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jull, AJT, Donahue, DJ, Broshi, M, Tov, E. 1995. Radiocarbon dating of scrolls and linen fragments from the Judean desert. Radiocarbon 37(1):11–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmussen, KL, van der Plicht, J, Cryer, FH, Doudna, G, Cross, FM, Strugnell, J. 2001. The effects of possible contamination on the radiocarbon dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls I: Castor oil. Radiocarbon 43(1):127–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar