Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:32:28.712Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Re-Evaluation of the Neolithic in Eastern Hungary Based on Calibrated Radiocarbon Dates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Ede Hertelendi ,
Nándor Kalicz ,
Pál Raczky ,
Ferenc Horváth ,
Mihály Veres ,
Éva Svingor ,
István Futó  and
László Bartosiewicz
Ede Hertelendi
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
Nándor Kalicz
Affiliation:
Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, úri utca 49, H-1250 Budapest, Hungary
Pál Raczky
Affiliation:
Eötvös Loránd University, Department of Archaeology, POB 107, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary
Ferenc Horváth
Affiliation:
Móra Ferenc Múzeum, Roosevelt tér 1–3, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
Mihály Veres
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
Éva Svingor
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
István Futó
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
László Bartosiewicz
Affiliation:
Archaeological Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, úri utca 49, H-1250 Budapest, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chief objective of this paper is to improve our understanding of the Neolithic in Eastern Hungary using absolute chronological data. To accomplish this we calibrated new measurements as well as previously published dates. The up-to-date, standardized evaluation of 261 calibrated measurements showed temporal overlaps between archaeological cultures defined on the basis of ceramic styles. The increasing number of dates suggest that the Neolithic period began at the turn of the 6th and 7th millennia bc and lasted for ca. 1500 yr in the present area of the Great Hungarian Plain (Alföld). Further research should be aimed at complementing the current data set with dates from western Hungary and establishing additional correlations among stratigraphic, typological and radiocarbon dates.

Type
II. 14C in Archaeology
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , 1995 , pp. 239 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © the Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona 

References

Aitchison, T. C., Ottaway, B. S. and Al-Ruzaiza, A. S. 1991 Summarizing a group of 14C dates on the historical time scale with a worked example from the Late Neolithic of Bavaria. Antiquity 65: 108–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aitchison, T. C., Ottaway, B. S. and Al-Ruzaiza, A. S. 1994 The central and southeast European Neolithic on the historical time scale. (Abstract) 15th International 14C Conference, Glasgow, Scotland, 15–19 August.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzián, I. 1966 Das Neolithikum in Ungarn. Archaeologia Austriaca 40: 249–280.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzián, I. 1985 Contribution to the prehistoric chronology of Hungary. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Institutes der Ungrarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 14: 293–298.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzián, I. and Csongor, É. 1987 New results of radiocarbon dating of archaeological finds in Hungary. In Pécsi, M. and Csongor, Æ., eds., The Holocene Environment in Hungary. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: 131–140.Google Scholar
Breunig, P. 1987 14C Chronologie des vorderasiatischen, südost- und mitteleuropäischen Neolithikums. Fundamenta A (13), 316 p.Google Scholar
Burkitt, M. and Childe, V. G. 1932 A chronological table of prehistory. Antiquity 6: 185–205.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1929 The Danube in Prehistory. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 479 p.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G. 1957 The Dawn of European Civilization. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul: 368 p.Google Scholar
Ehrich, R. W. 1992 Chronologies in Old World Archaeology I–II. Chicago-London, University of Chicago Press: 1113 p.Google Scholar
Falkenstein, A. 1965 Zu den Tontafeln aus Tărtăria. Germania 43: 269–273.Google Scholar
Gläser, R. 1991 Bemerkungen zur absoluten Datierung des Beginns der westlichen Linienbandkeramik. Banatica 11: 53–64.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E. and Horváth, F. 1992 Radiocarbon chronology of late Neolithic settlements in the Tisza-Maros region, Hungary. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 34(3): 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, F. 1991 Vinča culture and its connections with the southeast Hungarian Neolithic: A comparison of traditional and 14C chronology. Banatica 11: 259–273.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1970 Clay Gods. The Neolithic and Copper Age in Hungary. Budapest, Corvina-Hereditas, 82 p.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1985 On the chronological problems of the Neolithic and Copper Age in Hungary. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Institutes der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 14: 21–51.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1986 Über das spätneolitische Siedlungswesen in Ungarn. Béri Balogh Ádám Múzeum Évkönyve 13: 127–138.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. and Makkay, J. 1977 Die Linienbandkeramik in der Grossen Ungarischen Tiefebene. Studia Archaeologica 7: 385 p.Google Scholar
Kohl, G. and Quitta, H. 1964 Berlin radiocarbon measurements I. Radiocarbon 6: 308–317.Google Scholar
Kohl, G. and Quitta, H. 1966 Berlin radiocarbon measurements II. Radiocarbon 8: 27–45.Google Scholar
Korek, J. 1960 Vonaldiszes kerámia kultúra elterjedése az Alföldön (Verbreitung der linearkeramischen Kultur auf dem Alföld). Móra Ferenc Múzeum Évkönyve 1958/59: 19–52.Google Scholar
Korek, J. 1972. (ms.) A Tiszai Kultúra (The Tisza Culture). Budapest: 150 p.Google Scholar
Korek, J. 1989 Die Theiss-Kultur in der mittleren und nördlichen Theissgegend. Inventaria Praehistorica Hungariae 3: 136 p.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1969a Zur Geschichte der Erforschung der Körös-Starcevo-Kultur und einigen ihren wichtigsten Probleme. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 21: 13–31.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1969b The Late Neolithic Tordoş group of Signes. Alba Regia 10: 9–49.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1974 “Das frühe Neolithikum auf der Otzaki Magula” und die Körös-Starcevo-Kultur. Acta Archaeologica Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae 16: 131–154.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1974/75 Some stratigraphical and chronological problems of the Tărtăria tablets. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Institutes der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 5: 13–31.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1982 New Results in the Research of the Hungarian Neolithic. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: 181p.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1990 A tartariai leletek (The Finds of Tărtăria). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: 186 p.Google Scholar
Milojčić, V. 1949 Chronologie der Jüngeren Steinzeit Mittel- und Südosteuropas. Berlin, DAI - Gebr. Mann Verlag Gmbh.: 137 p.Google Scholar
Milojčić, V. 1965 Die Tontafeln von Tărtăria (Siebenbürgen) und die absolute Chronologie des mitteleuropäischen Neolithikums. Germania 43: 261–268.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1968a Absolute chronology of the Neolithic and Aeneoloithic periods in Central and South-Eastern Europe. Slovenská Archeológia 16: 1960.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1968b The Tărtăria tablets: a chronological issue. Antiquity 42: 32–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1970 A new epoch in radiocarbon dating. Antiquity 44: 38–45.Google Scholar
Petrasch, J. 1991 Zur absoluten Chronologie des südost- und mitteleuropäischen Neolithikums. Banatica 11: 65–71.Google Scholar
Quitta, H. and Kohl, G. 1969 Neue Radiocarbondaten zum Neolithikum und zur Frühbronzezeit Südosteuropas und der Sowjetunion. Zeitschrift für Archäologie 3: 223–255.Google Scholar
Raczky, P. 1983 A korai neolitikumból a középsõ neolitikumba való átmenet kérdései a Közép- és Felsõ-Tiszavidéken (Questions of transition between the Early and Middle Neolithic in the Middle and Upper Tisza Region). Archeológiai Értesitö 110: 161–194.Google Scholar
Raczky, P. ed., 1987 The Late Neolithic in the Tisza Region. Budapest and Szolnok, Szolnok County Museums: 144 p.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1966 The Tărtăria Tablets. Nestor , 1 Dec.: 469–470.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1970 The tree-ring calibration: An archaeological evaluation. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 36: 280–311.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1971 Sitagroi, radiocarbon and the prehistory of south-east Europe. Antiquity 45: 275–282.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973 Before Civilisation. The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. Harmondsworth, Knopf Press, 297 p.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 1985 Ancient Times. An Archaeological Map and Timescale for Europe, Western Asia and Egypt. Oxford, Ashmolean Museum.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1993 High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc and 2500–6000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 1–25.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szénászky, J. 1983 Über die chronologischen Fragen des Neolithikums in Südlichen Alföld. Archeológiai Értesitö 110: 243–246.Google Scholar
Tompa, F. 1927 The Neolithic at Bodrogkeresztúr. Archeológiai Értesitö 41: 31–49, 269–277.Google Scholar
Tompa, F. 1929 Die Bandkeramik in Ungarn. Archaeologia Hungarica 56: 70 p.Google Scholar
Tompa, F. 1937 25 Jahre Urgeschichtsforschung in Ungarn 1912–1936. Bericht der Römisch-Germanischen Kommission 24–25: 27–127.Google Scholar
Tompa, F. 1966/67 Bemerkungen zur Chronologie des Frühneolithikums auf dem Südalföld. Móra Ferenc Múzeum Évkönyve 1966–67: 35–40.Google Scholar
Trogmayer, O. 1968 Die Hauptfragen des Neolithikums der ungarischen Südtiefebene. Móra Ferenc Múzeum Évkönyve 1968: 11–19.Google Scholar
Vlassa, N. 1963 Chronology of the Neolithic in Transylvania in the light of Tărtăria settlements stratigraphy. Dacia 7: 485–494.Google Scholar
Zanotti, D. G. 1983 The position of the Tărtăria Tablets within the southeast Copper Age. American Journal of Archaeology 87: 209–213.Google Scholar