Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T05:33:50.886Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Reservoir Ages for Danish Fjords and Marine Waters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Susanne Heier-Nielsen ,
Jan Heinemeier ,
H. L. Nielsen  and
Niels Rud
Susanne Heier-Nielsen
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Department of Earth Sciences, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Jan Heinemeier
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
H. L. Nielsen
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Niels Rud
Affiliation:
AMS 14C Dating Laboratory, Institute of Physics and Astronomy, University of Aarhus, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

AMS 14C dates were measured for 28 mollusk shells collected live in Danish waters over the period ad 1885 to 1945. Fourteen samples were from fjords and 14 were marine samples from the Danish Skagerrak-Kattegat coastal area and from the Belts. Reservoir ages were calculated for all samples on the basis of the tree-ring calibration curve. For the marine samples, which cover the period ad 1885–1916, we found a weighted-average reservoir age of 377 ± 16 yr. The marine ∆R values (the difference between the measured 14C age and the age deduced from marine, mixed-layer model calculation of Stuiver, Pearson and Braziunas (1986)) were found to be uniform within the experimental uncertainty with a weighted average of ∆R = 13 ± 16 yr. Based on the observed scatter, the standard deviation is 21 yr. This result shows that it is justified to use the marine calibration curve with standard parameters (∆R = 0) when 14C-dating marine samples from the Danish area. Our value is consistent with the result ∆R = −33 ± 27 yr previously found for the Norwegian and Swedish Skagerrak-Kattegat coasts. In contrast, reservoir ages for Danish fjords were found to vary from 400 to >900 yr, far beyond experimental uncertainty. We ascribe this to varying content of dissolved, old soil carbonate (hard-water effect). Therefore, dating of samples from such fjord environments is expected to be uncertain by several hundred years.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 37 , Issue 3 , 1995 , pp. 875 - 882
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Andersen, B. G. 1968 Glacial geology of Western Troms, North Norway. Norges Geologiske Undersøkelse 256: 1–160.Google Scholar
Andersen, G. J., Heinemeier, J., Nielsen, H. L., Rud, N., Thomsen, M. S., Johnsen, S., Sveinbjörnsdóttir, A. and Hjartarson, A. 1989 AMS 14C dating on the Fossvogur sediments, Iceland. In Long, A., Kra, R. S. and Srdoč, D., eds., Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 592–600.Google Scholar
Bard, E. 1988 Correction of accelerator mass spectrometry 14C ages measured in planktonic foraminifera: Paleoceanographic implications. Paleoceanography 3 (6): 635–645.Google Scholar
Dye, T. 1994. Apparent ages of marine shells: Implications for archaeological dating in Hawai'i. Radiocarbon 36(1): 51–57.Google Scholar
Harkness, D. D. 1983 The extent of natural 14C deficiency in the coastal environment of the United Kingdom. In Mook, W. G. and Waterbolk, H. T., eds., Proceedings of the Symposium 14C and Archaeology. PACT 8: 351–364.Google Scholar
Krog, H. and Tauber, H. 1974 C-14 chronology of late-and postglacial marine deposits in North Jutland. Geological Survey of Denmark, Yearbook 1973: 93–105.Google Scholar
Limfjordskomiteen 1976. Limfjordsundersøgelsen 1973–75. Samlerapport: 1–67.Google Scholar
Olsson, I. U. 1980 Content of 14C in marine mammals from northern Europe. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R., eds., Proceedings of the 10th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 22(3): 662–675.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T. F. 1993 Modeling atmospheric 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 137–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M., Pearson, G. W. and Braziunas, T. 1986 Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal yr BP. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 980–1021.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Polach, H. A. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355–363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 215–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. S., Southon, J. R., Nelson, D. E. and Brown, T. A. 1984 Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B5: 289–293.Google Scholar