Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:49:27.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon to Calendar Date Conversion: Calendrical Band Widths as a Function of Radiocarbon Precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

F. G. McCormac
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of Geosciences, Palaeoecology Centre Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
M. G. L. Baillie
Affiliation:
The Queen's University of Belfast, School of Geosciences, Palaeoecology Centre Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Accurate high-precision 14C dating (i.e., ± 20 yr precision or less on the 14C date) provides the narrowest calendrical band width and, hence, the best age range determination possible. However, because of the structure in the 14C calibration curve, the calendar age range for a given 14C precision is not constant throughout the calibration range. In this study, we quantify the calendar band widths for a range of 14C precisions throughout the calibration range. We show that an estimate of the likely calendar band width in years can be obtained from the expression: Band width (yr) = 2.12 x 14C precision (1 σ) + 54.6. We also show that calendar band widths are widest around 4000 BP at the start of the Bronze Age, and become narrow through the later Bronze Age and Iron Age and back into the Neolithic.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500-2500 BC. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 839862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1989 Dating proxy data. In Berger, A., Schneider, S. and Duplessy, J., eds., Climate and Geosciences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 3945.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1986 High-precision decadal calibration of the rad iocarbon time scale, AD 1950-2500 BC. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 863910.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., 1986 Calibration Issue. Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon (2B): 8051030.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1986 High-precision calibration of the rad iocarbon time scale, AD 1950-500 BC. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 805838.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Polach, H. A. 1977 Discussion: Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3): 355363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1986 A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration. in Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 10221030.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1987 User's guide to the programs CALIB and DISPLAY Rev. 2.1: Quaternary Isotope Laboratory, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Suess, H. E. and Linick, T. W. 1990 The 14C record in bristlecone pine wood of the past 8000 years based on the dendrochronology of the late C. W. Ferguson. In Proceedings of A Royal Society and Academie des Sciences Discussion Meeting. London, The Royal Society: 514.Google Scholar
Van der Plicht, J. and Mook, W. G. 1989 Calibration of radiocarbon ages by computer. in Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 805816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar