Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T16:24:21.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Sample Preparation at the Circe AMS Laboratory in Caserta, Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Isabella Passariello*
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Fabio Marzaioli
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Carmine Lubritto
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Mauro Rubino
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Antonio D'Onofrio
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Nicola De Cesare
Affiliation:
Department of Life Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Gianluca Borriello
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Giovanni Casa
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Antonio Palmieri
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Detlef Rogalla
Affiliation:
Institut für Physik mit Ionenstrahlen, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
Carlo Sabbarese
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
Filippo Terrasi
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental Sciences, Second University of Naples, Caserta, Italy
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A system with several lines for the preparation of graphite targets for radiocarbon analysis has been built at the new accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facility in Caserta, Italy. Special attention has been paid in the design to the reduction of background contamination during sample preparation. Here, we describe the main characteristics of these preparation lines. Results of tests performed to measure 14C background levels and isotope fractionation in several blank samples with the Caserta AMS system are presented and discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bertolini, T, Rubino, M, Lubritto, C, D'Onofrio, A, Marzaioli, F, Passariello, I, Terrasi, F. 2005. Optimized sample preparation for isotopic analyses of CO2 in air: systematic study of precision and accuracy dependence on driving variables during CO2 purification process. Journal of Mass Spectrometry 40(8):1104–8.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Higham, T, Leach, P. 2004. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 46(1):1724.Google Scholar
Fowler, AJ, Gillespie, R, Hedges, REM. 1986. Radiocarbon dating of sediments. Radiocarbon 28(2A):441–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, JW. 1963. Wood cellulose. In: Whistler, RI, editor. Methods of Carbohydrate Chemistry. New York: Academic Press, p921.Google Scholar
Hoefs, J. 1987. Stable Isotope Geochemistry. 3rd edition. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 241 p.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Donahue, DJ, Hatheway, AL, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1986. Production of graphite targets by deposition from CO/H2 for precision accelerator 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 28(2A):191–7.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mook, WG, Streurman, HJ. 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. PACT 8:4753.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.Google Scholar
Steier, P, Dellinger, F, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Rom, W, Wild, EM. 2004. Pushing the precision limit of 14C AMS. Radiocarbon 46(1):516.Google Scholar
Terrasi, F, Rogalla, D, De Cesare, N, D'Onofrio, A, Lubritto, C, Marzaioli, F, Passariello, I, Rubino, M, Sabbarese, C, Casa, G, Palmieri, A, Gialanella, L, Imbriani, G, Roca, V, Romano, M, Sundquist, M, Loger, R. 2007. A new AMS facility in Caserta/Italy. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):14–7.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS. 1992. Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):344–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–9.Google Scholar