Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:44:16.793Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Tufa in Paleoclimatic Studies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Dušan Srdoč ,
Nada Horvatinčić ,
Bogomil Obelić  and
Adela Sliepčević
Dušan Srdoč
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Yugoslavia, PO Box 1016
Nada Horvatinčić
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Yugoslavia, PO Box 1016
Bogomil Obelić
Affiliation:
Rudjer Bošković Institute, Zagreb, Yugoslavia, PO Box 1016
Adela Sliepčević
Affiliation:
University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Yugoslavia
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Calcareous deposits known as tufa or travertine contain biogenic carbon and are a potential source of geochronologic information. Many dated samples from Karstic regions in Yugoslavia proved that 14C analyses of tufa can provide reliable data reflecting climatic conditions in the past. Systematic dating of tufa samples revealed two distinct groups of deposits: recent tufa deposits, with a sharp age limit of ∼6000 ± 500 years BP, and old tufa deposits with 14C age ranges from 25,000 ± 2300 years BP to the lowest limit of our 14C dating system (∼37,000 years). A histogram based on the initial activity AO = 0.85 shows the age distribution of randomly sampled tufas vs sample frequency. A time gap between ∼6000 BP and ∼23,000 BP is evident, reflecting cooler climatic conditions. The start of peat deposition is coincident with that of tufa growth in the Holocene.

Paleoclimatic implications of tufa growth periods obtained by 14C dating are as follows: climatic conditions that favor tufa formation at least in karstic regions, are very stringent. Therefore, climatic conditions, such as mean annual temperature and humidity, as well as hydrologic and vegetational conditions, must have been very similar in periods of tufa growth. While recent tufa deposits are coincident with the warm Holocene period, old tufa can be associated with warm interstadials in the Würm.

Type
III. 14C Applications
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 25 , Issue 2: 11th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1983 , pp. 421 - 427
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Geyh, MA, 1973, On the determination of the initial 14C content in groundwater, in : Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p D58–D69.Google Scholar
Geyh, MA, Rohde, P, 1972, Weichselian chronostratigraphy, 14C dating and statistics, in : Montreal, sec 12, p 26–36.Google Scholar
Lamb, HH, Lewis, R, and Woodroffe, A, 1966, Atmospheric circulation and the main climatic variables, in : London, Royal Meteorol Soc, p 174.Google Scholar
Olsson, IU, 1980, Progress in radiocarbon dating, promising techniques and trends in the research, in : Fizika, v 12 (S2), p 37–68.Google Scholar
Ralph, EK, Michael, HN, and Han, MC, 1973, Radiocarbon dates and reality: MASCA Newsletter, v 9, 1, p 1–20.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D, Horvatinčić, N, Obelić, B, and Sliepčević, A, 1982, Rudjer Bošković Institute radiocarbon measurements VII: Radiocarbon, v 24, p 352–371.Google Scholar
Srdoč, D, Obelić, B, Horvatinčić, N, and Sliepčević, A, 1980, Radiocarbon dating of calcareous tufa; how reliable results can we expect?, in : Radiocarbon, v 22, p 858–862.Google Scholar
Woldstedt, P, 1962, Ueber die Gliederung der Quartärs und Pleistozäns; Eiszeitalter u Gegenwart, Oehringen/Württ, v 13, p 115.Google Scholar