Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:29:41.971Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Single Compounds Isolated from Pottery Cooking Vessel Residues

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A W Stott ,
R Berstan ,
P Evershed ,
R E M Hedges ,
C Bronk Ramsey  and
M J Humm
A W Stott
Affiliation:
Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Merelwood, Cumbria, United Kingdom
R Berstan
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
P Evershed
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, University of Bristol, Bristol, BS8 1TS, United Kingdom
R E M Hedges*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
C Bronk Ramsey
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
M J Humm
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, Keble Road, Oxford, OX1 3QJ, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have developed and demonstrated a practical methodology for dating specific compounds (and octade-canoic or stearic acid—C18:0—in particular) from the lipid material surviving in archaeological cooking pots. Such compounds may be extracted from about 10 g of cooking potsherd, and, after derivatization, can be purified by gas chromatography. To obtain sufficient material for precise dating repetitive, accumulating, GC separation is necessary. Throughout the 6000-year period studied, and over a variety of site environments within England, dates on C18:0 show no apparent systematic error, but do have a greater variability than can be explained by the errors due to the separation chemistry and measurement process alone. This variability is as yet unexplained. Dates on C16:0 show greater variability and a systematic error of approximately 100-150 years too young, and it is possible that this is due to contamination from the burial environment. Further work should clarify this.

Type
I. Becoming Better
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 43 , Issue 2A: Proceedings of the 17th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 3) , 2001 , pp. 191 - 197
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bronk, CR, Hedges, REM. 1987. A gas ion source for radiocarbon dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B29:45–9.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Hedges, REM. 1997. Hybrid ion sources: radiocarbon measurements from microgram to milligram. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B123:539–45.Google Scholar
Simpson, IA, van Gerben, V, Perret, VP, Elhmmali, MM, Roberts, DJ, Evershed, RP. 1999. Lipid biomarkers as manuring practice in relict anthropogenic soils. Holocene 9(2):223–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglinton, TI, Aluwihare, LI, Bauer, JE, Druffel, ERM, McNichol, AP. 1996. Gas chromatographic isolation of individual compounds from complex matrices for radiocarbon dating. Analytical Chemistry 68:904–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evershed, RP, Heron, C, Charters, S, Goad, LJ. 1992. The survival of food residues: new methods of analysis, interpretation and application. Proceedings of the British Academy 77:187–208.Google Scholar
Evershed, RP, Dudd, SN, Charters, S, Mottram, H, Stott, AW, Raven, A, van Bergen, PF, Bland, HA. 1999. Lipids as carriers of anthropogenic signals from prehistory. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 354:19–31.Google Scholar
Evin, J., Gabasio, M, Lefevre, J-C. 1989. Preparative techniques for radiocarbon dating of potsherds. Radiocarbon 31(3):276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, REM, Humm, MJ, Foreman, J, Van Klinken, GJ, Bronk, CR. 1992. Developments in sample combustion to CO2, and in the CO2 ion source system. Radiocarbon 34(3):306–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, REM, Tiemei, C, Housley, RA 1992. Results and methods in the radiocarbon dating of pottery. Radiocarbon 34(3):906–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, RA, Stipp, JJ, Tamers, MA, Bonani, G, Suter, M, Wolfli, W. 1986. Archaeological sherd dating: comparison of thermoluminescence dates with radiocarbon dates by beta counting and accelerator techniques. Radiocarbon 28(2A):719.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolic, ED 1995. Direct radiocarbon dating of pottery: selective heat treatment to retrieve smoke-derived carbon. Radiocarbon, 37(2):275–84.Google Scholar
Stott, AW, Berstan, R, Evershed, RP, Bronk-Ramsey, C, Humm, MJ, Hedges, R. Forthcoming. Compound specific 14C dating of lipids preserved in archaeological pottery. Analytical Chemistry. Google Scholar