Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:28:27.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Neolithic Pottery

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

G Zaitseva ,
V Skripkin ,
N Kovaliukh ,
G Possnert ,
P Dolukhanov  and
A Vybornov
G Zaitseva*
Affiliation:
Institute for History of Material Culture, St. Petersburg, Russia
V Skripkin
Affiliation:
Institute of the Geochemistry of Environment, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
N Kovaliukh
Affiliation:
Institute of the Geochemistry of Environment, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Kiev, Ukraine
G Possnert
Affiliation:
University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden
P Dolukhanov
Affiliation:
Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
A Vybornov
Affiliation:
State Pedagogical University, Samara, Russia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The direct measurement of organic matter included in archaeological pottery may yield a reliable assessment of age. The main problem consists in the identification of possible origins and assessment of distortion for the age of organic inclusions. Our experiments show that shells included in pottery fabrics are strongly influenced by the reservoir effect, which may reach 500 yr or more. Other organic inclusions, such as lake ooze, do not visibly distort the age. The obtained series of radiocarbon dates have been used for the assessing the age of the early stages of pottery manufacture in southern Russia.

Type
Radiocarbon Chronologies of the Neolithic and Metal Ages
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2009 , pp. 795 - 801
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bonsall, C, Cook, G, Manson, JL, Saderson, D. 2002. Direct dating of Neolithic pottery: progress and prospects. Documenta Praehistorica XXIX:47–59.Google Scholar
Buzinny, M, Skripkin, V. 1995. Newly designed 0.8-mL Tephlon® vial for microvolume radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 37(2):743–7.Google Scholar
Kohl, G, Quitta, H. 1964. Berlin radiocarbon measurements I. Radiocarbon 6:308–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mamonov, AE. 1995. Yelshanskii kompleks stojanki Chekalino IV. In: Vasil'ev, IB, editor. Drevnie kul'tury lesostepnogo Povolzh'ya. Samara: Samara State Pedagogical University. p 3–25.Google Scholar
Skripkin, VV, Kovalyukh, NN. 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1):211–4.Google Scholar
Van Strydonck, M, Boudin, M, Ervynck, A. 2004. Possibilities and limitations of the use of stable isotopes (δ13C and δ15N) from human bone collagen and carbonate as an aid in migration studies. In: Scott, EM, Alekseev, AY, Zaitseva, G, editors. Impact of the Environment of Human Migration in Eurasia. NATO Science Series, Volume 42. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. p 125–35.Google Scholar
Vasil'ev, IB, Vybornov, AA. 1988. Neolit Povolzh'ya. Kuibyshev: State Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
Vybornov, AA. 1990. Neolit Severnogo Prikaspiya I ego sootnoshenie s kul'turami sopredelk'nyh territorii. In: Vasil'ev, IB, editor. Problemy drevnei istorii Severnogo Prikaspiya. Kuibyshev: State Pedagogical Institute.Google Scholar
Vybornov, AA. 2008. The Neolithic of the Volga-Kama Rivers Basin. Samara: Samara State Pedagogical University Monograph. In Russian.Google Scholar
Yudin, AI. 2005. Low Volga cultural community of the Neolithic: the problems of formation, contacts and evolution. In: Proceedings of the Scientific Conference Devoted to the 100th Anniversary of V.A. Gorodtsov in the State Historical Museum. April 2003. Moscow. p 7–17. In Russian.Google Scholar