Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:36:15.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Early Dynastic Mesopotamia: Results, Limitations, and Prospects

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2016

Maciej Mateusz Wencel
Maciej Mateusz Wencel*
Affiliation:
University of Oxford, Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford, UK
*
*Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes the results of Bayesian modeling of radiocarbon dates from Early Bronze Age contexts in Southern Mesopotamia, modern-day southern Iraq. The model uses 14C dates available in the literature, employing archaeological and textual information to correlate contexts from a number of important Mesopotamian sites. The insufficient number of dates makes it impossible to precisely define the chronology of the period in question; however, the analysis allows for observing patterns of cultural change otherwise invisible in archaeological and textual records. Firstly, it is suggested that there was a hiatus of at least a century between the latest protocuneiform texts and the earliest historical writing. Furthermore, the results seem to argue against a steady, gradual evolution of literate civilizations, indicating a more complex and varied process of development.

Keywords

Bayesian analysisBayesian modelingMesopotamiaIraq
Type
Puzzles in Archaeological Chronologies
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 59 , Special Issue 2: Proceedings of the 22nd International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 2) , April 2017 , pp. 635 - 645
Copyright
© 2016 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 2015 Radiocarbon Conference, Dakar, Senegal, 16–20 November 2015

References

REFERENCES

Alster, B. 1976. On the earliest Sumerian literary tradition. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 28(2):109–126.Google Scholar
Aruz, J. 2003. “Intercultural Style” carved chlorite objects. In: Aruz J, editor. Art of the First Cities: The Third Millennium B.C. from the Mediterranean to the Indus. New York: The Metropolitan Museum of Art. p 325–346.Google Scholar
Barker, H, Mackey, J. 1961. British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements III. Radiocarbon 3(1):39–45.Google Scholar
Biggs, RD. 1966. The Abū Ṣalābīkh tablets. A preliminary survey. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 20(2):73–88.Google Scholar
Biggs, RD. 1974. Inscriptions from Tell Abū Ṣalābīkh. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Biggs, RD, Postgate, JN. 1978. Inscriptions from Abu Salabikh, 1975. Iraq 40(2):101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowman, SGE, Ambers, JC, Leese, MN. 1990. Re-evaluation of British Museum radiocarbon dates issued between 1980 and 1984. Radiocarbon 32(1):59–79.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009a. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51(1):337–360.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009b. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 51(3):1023–1045.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C, Lee, S. 2012. Recent and planned developments of the program OxCal. Radiocarbon 55(3–4):720–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruins, HJ. 2001. Near East chronology: towards an integrated approach. Radiocarbon 43(3):1147–1154.Google Scholar
Bruins, HJ, Mook, WG. 1989. The need for a calibrated radiocarbon chronology of Near Eastern archaeology. Radiocarbon 31(3):1019–1029.Google Scholar
Bruins, HJ, Plicht van der, J, Mook, WG. 1991. Establishing calibrated 14C chronologies: problematic time zones and high-precision dating with reference to Near Eastern archaeology. Radiocarbon 33(2):183–184.Google Scholar
Buccellati, G, Biggs, RD. 1969. Cuneiform Texts from Nippur: The Eighth and Ninth Seasons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Charvát, P. 1982. Early Ur - war chiefs and kings of Early Dynastic III. Altorientalische Forschungen 9:43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charvát, P. 1988. The origins of Sumerian states: a modest proposal. In: Vavroušek P, Souček V, editors. Šulmu - Papers on the Ancient Near East Presented at International Conference of Socialist Countries (Prague, September 30 - October 3, 1986). Prague: Charles University Press. p 101–132.Google Scholar
Charvát, P. 1998. On People, Signs and States. Prague: The Oriental Institute of Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic.Google Scholar
Dee, M, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2014. High-precision Bayesian modeling of samples susceptible to inbuilt age. Radiocarbon 56(1):83–94.Google Scholar
Delougaz, P. 1952. Pottery from the Diyala Region. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Englund, RK. 1998. Texts from the Late Uruk Period. In: Bauer J, Englund RK, Krebernik M, editors. Mesopotamien: Späturuk-Zeit und frühdynastische Zeit. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht. p 15–233.Google Scholar
Englund, RK, Boehmer, RM. 1994. Archaic Administrative Texts from Uruk: The Early Campaigns. Berlin: Mann.Google Scholar
Evans, JM. 2007. The square temple at Tell Asmar and the construction of early dynastic Mesopotamia, ca. 2900–2350 BCE. American Journal of Archaeology 11(4):599–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falkenstein, A. 1974. The Sumerian Temple City. Monographs on the Ancient Near East 1:1–21.Google Scholar
Finkbeiner, U, Röllig, W. 1983. Ğamdat Naṣr: Period or Regional Style? Papers Given at Symposium Held in Tübingen November 1983. Wiesband: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Forest, J-D. 1999. Les premiers temples de Mésopotamie (4e et 3e millénaires). Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Frayne, DR. 2009. The struggle for hegemony in “Early Dynastic II” Sumer. The Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies Journal 4:37–76.Google Scholar
Hansen, DP. 1965. The pottery sequence at Nippur from Middle Uruk to the end of the Old Babylonian Period (3400–1600 B.C.). In: Ehrich RW, editor. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Chicago: Chicago University Press. p 201–213.Google Scholar
Hansen, DP, Dales, GF. 1962. The Temple of Inanna, Queen of Heaven, at Nippur. Archaeology 15(2):75–84.Google Scholar
Hassan, FA, Robinson, SW. 1987. High-precision radiocarbon chronometry of ancient Egypt and comparisons with Nubia, Palestine and Mesopotamia. Antiquity 61(231):119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hritz, C, Pournelle, J, Smith, J, Albadran, B, Issa, BM, Al-Handal, A. 2012. Mid-Holocene dates for organic-rich sediment, palustrine shell, and charcoal from southern Iraq. Radiocarbon 54(1):65–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huh, SK. 2008. Studien zur Region Lagaš - von der Ubaid- bis zur altbabylonischen Zeit. Münster: Ugarit-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lecompte, C. 2015. Remarques sur les textes archaíques d’Ur. Akkadica 136(2):141–156.Google Scholar
Lecompte, C, Verderame, L. 2013. Archaic tablets and fragments from Ur: from L. Woolley’s Excavations at the Royal Cemetery. Messina: DiCAM.Google Scholar
Marchetti, N, Marchesi, G. 2011. Royal Statuary of Early Dynastic Mesopotamia. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns.Google Scholar
Matthews, RJ. 2003. The Excavations at Tell Brak 4: Exploring an Upper Mesopotamian Regional Centre, 1994–96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mellaart, J. 1979. Egyptian and Near Eastern chronology: a dilemma? Antiquity 53(207):6–19.Google Scholar
Michałowski, P. 1983. History as charter: some observations on the Sumerian King List. Journal of the American Oriental Society 103(1):237–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nissen, HJ. 1966. Zur Datierung des Königsfridhofes von Ur: unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Stratigraphie der Privatgräber. Bonn: Rudolf Habelt Verlag.Google Scholar
Nissen, HJ. 1986. The development of writing and of glyptic art. In: Finkbeiner U, Röllig W, editors. Ğamdat Naṣr: Period or Regional Style? Papers Given at Symposium Held in Tübingen November 1983. Wiesbaden: Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag.Google Scholar
Nissen, HJ. 1987. The Proto- and Early Historic periods. In: Aurenche O, Evin J, Hours F, editors. Chronologies du Proche Orient. Lyon: Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen. p 607–614.Google Scholar
Nissen, HJ, Damerow, P, Englund, RK. 1993. Archaic Bookkeeping: Early Writing and Techniques of the Economic Administration in the Ancient Near East. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Pollock, S. 1985. Chronology of the Royal Cemetery of Ur. Iraq 47:129–158.Google Scholar
Porada, ED, Hansen, DP, Dunham, S, Babcock, SH. 1992. The chronology of Mesopotamia, ca. 7000–1600 B.C. In: Ehrich RW, editor. Chronologies in Old World Archaeology. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. p 77–121.Google Scholar
Postgate, JN. 1977. Excavations at Abu Salabikh, 1976. Iraq 39(2):269–299.Google Scholar
Postgate, JN. 1992. Early Mesopotamia: Society and Economy at the Dawn of History. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Postgate, JN, Krebernik, M. 2009. The tablets from Abu Salabikh and their provenance. Iraq 71:1–32.Google Scholar
Reade, J. 2001. Assyrian king-lists, the royal tombs of Ur, and Indus origins. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 60(1):1–29.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Roaf, M. 2012. The fall of Babylon in 1499 NC or 1595 MC. Akkadica 133:147–174.Google Scholar
Rothfield, L. 2009. The Rape of Mesopotamia: Behind the Looting of the Iraq Museum. Chicago: Chicago University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sallaberger, W. 2010. The city and the palace at archaic Ur. In: Šašková L, Pecha K, Charvát P, editors. Shepherds of the Black-Headed People: The Royal Office vis-á-vis Godhead in Ancient Mesopotamia. Plzeň: Západočeská Univerzita. p 31–37.Google Scholar
Sallaberger, W, Schrakamp, I. 2015. Philological data for a historical chronology of Mesopotamia in the 3rd Millennium. In: History & Philology. Turnhout: Brepols. p 1–136.Google Scholar
Schmandt-Besserat, D. 1979. An Archaic Recording System and the Origin of Writing. Malibu: Undena.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. 1999. On rulers, priests and sacred marriage: tracing the evolution of Early Sumerian kingship. In: Watanabe K, editor. Priests and Officials in the Ancient Near East. Heidelberg: C. Winter. p 101–137.Google Scholar
Steinkeller, P. 2003. An Ur III manuscript of the Sumerian King List. In: Wilcke C, Sallaberger W, Volk K, Zgoll A, editors. Literatur, Politik und Recht in Mesopotamien: Festschrift für Claus Wilcke. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag. p 267–292.Google Scholar
Stuckenrath, RJ. 1963. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates VI. Radiocarbon 5:82–103.Google Scholar
Stuckenrath, RJ, Ralph, EK. 1965. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates VIII. Radiocarbon 7:187–199.Google Scholar
Stuckenrath, RJ, Coe, WR, Ralph, EK. 1966. University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates IX. Radiocarbon 8:348–385.Google Scholar
Sürenhagen, D. 2002. Death in Mesopotamia: the “Royal Tombs” of Ur revisited. In: Werr LG, Curtis J, Martin HP, McMahon A, Oates J, Reade J, editors. Of Pots and Plans: Papers on the Archaeology and History of Mesopatamia and Syria Presented to David Oates in Honour of His 75th Birthday. London: NABU. p 324–338.Google Scholar
Tite, MS, Bowman, SGE, Ambers, JC, Matthews, KJ. 1987. Preliminary statement on an error in British Museum radiocarbon dates (BM-1700 to BM-2315). Antiquity 61(232):168.Google Scholar
van de Mieroop, M. 2016. A History of the Ancient Near East, ca. 3000–323 BC. Malden: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Bruins, HJ. 2001. Radiocarbon dating in Near-Eastern contexts: confusion and quality control. Radiocarbon 43(3):1155–1166.Google Scholar
van Ess, M. 2013. Neue Radiokarondatierungen aus Uruk. In: Crüsemann N, van Ess M, Hilgert M, Salje B, editors. Uruk: 5000 Jahre Megacity. Petersburg: Reiss-Engelhorn-Museen.Google Scholar
van Ess, M. 2015. Absolute chronology of Uruk and Jemdet Nasr periods at Uruk, Southern Mesopotamia. The interpretation of additional 14C samples. Zeitschrift Für Orient-Archäologie 8:10–37.Google Scholar
Waterbolk, HT. 1994. Radiocarbon dating Levantine prehistory. In: Bar-Yosef O, Kra RS, editors. Late Quaternary Chronology and Paleoclimates of the Eastern Mediterranean. Tucson: Radiocarbon. p 351–371.Google Scholar
Williams, AR. 2013. Looters shatter museum of ancient Egyptian treasures. National Geographic 2013, August 23. URL: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2013/08/pictures/130823-museum-mallawi-egypt-looting-artifacts-archaeology-science-antiquities/.Google Scholar
Wright, HT, Rupley, ESA. 2001. Calibrated radiocarbon age determinations of Uruk-related assemblies. In: Rothman E, editor. Uruk, Mesopotamia & Its Neighbours: Cross-Cultural Interactions in the Era of State Formation. Santa Fe: SAR.Google Scholar
Zaina, F. 2015. Radiocarbon date from Early Dynastic Kish and the stratigraphy and chronology of the YWN Sounding at Tell Ingharra. Iraq 77(1):225–234.Google Scholar
Zettler, RL. 2003. Reconstructing the world of Ancient Mesopotamia: divided beginnings and holistic history. Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 46(1):3–45.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Wencel supplementary material

Appendix

Download Wencel supplementary material(File)
File 8.7 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wencel supplementary material

Wencel supplementary material 2

Download Wencel supplementary material(File)
File 5.5 KB