Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T08:28:27.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dating of Copper-Preserved Organics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

R. P. Beukens ,
L. A. Pavlish ,
R. G. V. Hancock ,
R. M. Farquhar ,
G. C. Wilson ,
P. J. Julig  and
William Ross
R. P. Beukens
Affiliation:
IsoTrace Facility, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7 Canadax
L. A. Pavlish
Affiliation:
Archaeometry Laboratory, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7 Canada
R. G. V. Hancock
Affiliation:
SLOWPOKE Reactor Facility, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A4 Canada
R. M. Farquhar
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5S 1A7 Canada
G. C. Wilson
Affiliation:
Turnstone Geological Services, P. O. Box 130, Station B, Toronto, Ontario, M5T 2T3 Canada
P. J. Julig
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Laurentian University, Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 2C6 Canada
William Ross
Affiliation:
Ontario Ministry of Culture and Communication, Thunder Bay, Ontario, P7E 5N7 Canada
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The small but vital role of 14C dating in archaeometric research is clearly shown in the copper project reported herein. The 14C ages place a time perspective on the “Old Copper Culture Complex,” substantiating early Libby dates that had been questioned. The respective roles of INAA, PGE and Pb isotope work are briefly summarized. A long tradition of heat treatment from Paleoindian stone to Archaic copper is suggested.

Type
V. Archaeological Applications
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 34 , Issue 3: Proceedings of the 14th International Radiocarbon Conference , 1992 , pp. 890 - 897
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Arthurs, D. (ms.) 1979 An Archaic site on the western Lake Superior shore. Historic Planning and Research, Ministry of Culture and Communication, Government of Ontario, Report on file, Toronto: 35 p.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P. (ms.) 1971 Beschrijving van het programma MINISPEC. Department of Physics, State University of Groningen, The Netherlands, Report IR-99: 32 p.Google Scholar
Beukens, R. P., Gurfinkel, D. M. and Lee, H. W. 1986 Progress at the IsoTrace Radiocarbon Facility. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2A): 229–236.Google Scholar
de Jong, A. F. M., Becker, B. and Mook, W. G. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 3930–3230 cal bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 939–941.Google Scholar
Flaskerd, G. 1940 A metallographic study of certain Pre-Columbian American implements. American Antiquity 17: 57–60.Google Scholar
Giddings, J. 1968 Ancient Men of the Arctic. London, Secker & Warburg: XXVIII–XXIX.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1961 Lake Superior copper and the Indians. Miscellaneous Studies of Great Lakes Prehistory, University of Michigan Anthropology Museum, Anthropology Paper 17: 98 p.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. B. 1964 The northeast Woodlands area. In Jennings, J. D. and Norbeck, E., eds., Prehistoric Man in the New World. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 223–258.Google Scholar
Hancock, R. G. V., Farquhar, R. M., Pavlish, L. A., Salloum, R., Fox, W. A. and Wilson, G. C. 1991a North American native copper and European trade copper analyses. In Pernicka, E. and Wagner, G., eds., Archaeometry '90. Basel, Birkhauser Verlag: 173–182.Google Scholar
Hancock, R. G. V., Pavlish, L. A., Farquhar, R. M., Salloum, R., Fox, W. A. and Wilson, G. C. 1991b Distinguishing European and northeastern North American native copper. Archaeometry 33: 69–86.Google Scholar
Johnson, F. 1955 Reflection on the significance of radiocarbon dates. In Libby, W. F., Radiocarbon Dating, 2nd edition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 141–161.Google Scholar
Kromer, B., Rhein, M., Bruns, M., Schoch-Fischer, H., Münnich, K. O., Stuiver, M. and Becker, B. 1986 Radiocarbon calibration data for the 6th to the 8th Millennia bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon (28)2B: 954–960.Google Scholar
Libby, W. F. 1955 Radiocarbon Dating, 2nd edition. Chicago, University of Chicago Press: 175 p.Google Scholar
Linick, T. W., Long, A., Damon, P. E. and Ferguson, C. W. 1986 High-precision radiocarbon dating of bristlecone pine from 6554 to 5350 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon (28)2B: 943–953.Google Scholar
Linick, T. W., Suess, H. E. and Becker, B. 1985 La Jolla measurements of radiocarbon in South German oak tree-ring chronologies. Radiocarbon 27(1): 20–32.Google Scholar
Miles, S. W. 1951 A revaluation of the Old Copper Industry. American Antiquity 16: 240–247.Google Scholar
Pavlish, L. A. and Banning, E. B. 1980 Revolutionary developments in carbon-14 dating. American Antiquity 45(2): 290–297.Google Scholar
Pavlish, L. A. and Sheppard, P. J. 1983 Thermoluminescent determination of Paleoindian heat treatment in Ontario, Canada. American Antiquity 48(4): 793–799.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W., Pilcher, J. R., Baille, M. G., Corbett, D. M. and Qua, F. 1986 High-precision radiocarbon measurement of Irish oaks to show the natural 14C variations from AD 1840 to 5210 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 911–934.Google Scholar
Pearson, G. W. and Stuiver, M. 1986 High-precision calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, 500–2500 bc. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 839–862.Google Scholar
Platcek, E. P. 1965 Preliminary survey of a Fowl Lakes site. Minnesota Archaeologist XXVII(2): 21–92.Google Scholar
Purdy, B. 1982 Pyrotechnology: Prehistoric application to chert materials in North America. In Wertime, T. A. and Wertime, S. F., eds., Early Pyrotechnology. Washington, D.C., Smithsonian Institution Press: 31–44.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1973 Before Civilization: The Radiocarbon Revolution and Prehistoric Europe. New York, Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Ritzenthaler, R. E. and Wittry, W. L. 1952 The Oconto site–an Old Copper manifestation. Wisconsin Archaeologist 33: 199–223.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Kromer, B., Becker, B. and Ferguson, C. W. 1986 Radiocarbon age calibration back to 13,300 Years BP and the 14C age matching of the German oak and US bristlecone pine chronologies. In Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 28(2B): 969–979.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. F. 1987 The Early History of Metallurgy in Europe. New York, Longman: 90 p.Google Scholar
West, G. A. 1929 Copper – Its mining and use by aborigines of the Lake Superior Region. Public Museum of Milwaukee Bulletin 10: 1–184.Google Scholar
West, G. A. 1932 Exceptional prehistoric implements. Public Museum of Milwaukee Bulletin 10: 377–400.Google Scholar
Wilson, G. C., Rucklidge, J. C., Kieser, W. E. and Beukens, R. P. 1984 Development of an ion microprobe stage for accelerator mass spectrometry. In Wölfli, W., Polach, H. A. and Anderson, H. H., eds., Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 233 B5(2): 200–203.Google Scholar
Wittry, W. L. 1951 A preliminary study of the Old Copper Complex. The Wisconsin Archaeologist 32: 1–18.Google Scholar