Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T14:33:31.112Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radiocarbon Dating Archaeologic and Environmental Samples Containing 10 to 120 Milligrams of Carbon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

John C Sheppard
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164
J Fred Hopper
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164
Yvonne Welter
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering Washington State University Pullman, Washington 99164
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A conventional 14C system with either a 15cm3 or a 100cm3 methane gas proportional counting tube, each constructed from high purity copper, has been used at the Washington State University 14C laboratory for three years (Sheppard, Hopper, Westberg, 1981). The electronic components of this system included highly stable (John Fluke) power supplies, modified pre-amplifiers (Canberra), and NIM amplifiers, single channel analyzers, scalers, timers, etc, (ORTEC). Modules were selected for a highly stable low-noise system. The system was designed to minimize problems generated by ground-loops, electromagnetic noise pick-up, and line noise. It operates in a copper-lined basement room of a four-story brick and concrete building along with a second and older gas proportional system which has three 500cm3 copper counting tubes operated at 2 or 3 atmospheres of methane. Analysis of the older system's background data indicates that the background counting rate of 0.8 counts per minute is virtually independent of atmospheric pressure. It has not been possible to determine the pressure dependence of the small counting tubes.

Type
V. General Aspects of 14C Technique
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bennett, CA and Franklin, NL, 1954, Statistical analysis in chemistry and the chemical industry; New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 677684.Google Scholar
Clark, RM and Renfrew, C, 1973, The tree-ring calibration of radiocarbon and the chronology of ancient Egypt: Nature v 243, p 266270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, LA, 1971, On the interpretation of errors in counting experiments: Anal Letters, v 4, p 777784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, LA, 1973, The evaluation of radiocarbon measurements and inherent statistical limitations in age resolution, in : Wellington, Royal Soc New Zealand, p 598611.Google Scholar
Feller, W, 1966, An introduction to probability theory and its applications, v II: New York, John Wiley & Sons, p 5657.Google Scholar
Greenwood, M and Yule, GU, 1920, An inquiry into the nature of frequency distributions representative of multiple happenings: Jour Royal Stat Soc, v 83, p 255279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, BI, 1942, Significance levels of the ratio of the mean square successive difference to the variance: Anal Math Statistics, v 12, p 113.Google Scholar
Hilaire, M, 1973, Treatment of errors in low-activity measurements: Nuclear Instruments Methods, v 112, p 385390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooton, KAH and Parsons, ML, 1973, Equipment stability in x-ray fluorescence spectrometry and radioactive counting-a statistical approach: Anal Chemistry, v 45, p 22182227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, JW, 1973, Dead-time problems: Nuclear Instruments Methods: v 112, p 4757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, JW, 1974, Some formulae for a dead-time-distorted Poisson process: Nuclear Instruments Methods: v 117, p 401404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, JW, 1979, Some second thoughts on error statement: Nuclear Instruments Methods: v 163, p 241251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazdur, MF, 1976, Counting statistics in low-level radioactivity measurements with fluctuating counting efficiency: Internatl Jour Appl Isotopes, v 20, p 179184.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Baxter, MS, and Aitchison, TC, 1931, An Assessment of variability in radiocarbon dating, in : IAEA, Vienna, p 371391.Google Scholar
Sheppard, JC, Hopper, JF, and Westberg, HH, 1981, Radiocarbon dating of milligram-sized archaeological and environmental samples, in : IAEA, Vienna, p 409416.Google Scholar