Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:44:23.205Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Radiocarbon Dates from the Mussau Islands and the Lapita Colonization of the Southwestern Pacific

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

P V Kirch  and
T L Hunt
P V Kirch
Affiliation:
The Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
T L Hunt
Affiliation:
The Burke Museum, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Three decades of archaeological excavations in Melanesia and Western Polynesia have led to a consensus among Oceanic prehistorians that the initial human colonization of the southwestern Pacific (east of the Solomons) was effected by populations of the Lapita Cultural Complex (Green, 1979; Kirch, 1982, 1984; Allen, 1984; Spriggs, 1984). Although the western Melanesian islands of New Guinea, the Bismarck Archipelago, and possibly the Solomon Islands were settled in the late Pleistocene by small hunter-gatherer populations (Downie & White, 1979; Specht, Lilley & Normu, 1981; Groube et al, 1986), discovery and occupation by humans of the more remote island chains to the east required sophisticated voyaging and colonization strategies. That the Austronesian-speaking Lapita people possessed long-distance voyaging craft is suggested both by lexical reconstructions, and by the archaeological evidence of long-distance transport of obsidian and other exotic materials over distances of up to 3700km (Ambrose & Green, 1972; Best, 1987). Lapita sites are marked by a distinctive complex of dentate-stamped earthenware ceramics, and associated shell, bone, and stone artifacts. Sites yielding such assemblages have been recorded between the Bismarck Archipelago in the west, through Melanesia, and as far east as Samoa and Tonga, a straight-line distance of ca 4500km.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 30 , Issue 2 , 1988 , pp. 161 - 169
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Allen, J, 1984, In search of the Lapita homeland: Jour Pacific History, v 19, p 186–201.Google Scholar
Ambrose, W R and Green, R C, 1972, First millennium bc transport of obsidian from New Britain to the Solomon Islands: Nature, v 237, p 31.Google Scholar
Ammerman, A J and Cavalli-Sforza, L L, 1984, The Neolithic transition and the genetics of populations in Europe: Princeton, Princeton Univ Press.Google Scholar
Anson, D, 1986, Lapita pottery of the Bismarck Archipelago and its affinities: Archaeology in Oceania, v 21, no. 3, p 157–165.Google Scholar
Bafmatuk, R, Egloff, B and Kaiku, R, 1980, Islanders: past and present: Hemisphere, v 25, p 77–81.Google Scholar
Best, S, 1987, Long distance obsidian travel and possible implications for the settlement of Fiji: Archaeology in Oceania, v 22, p 27–31.Google Scholar
Clark, J and Terrell, J, 1978, Archaeology in Oceania: Ann Rev Anthropol, v 7, p 293–319.Google Scholar
Diamond, J, 1977, Colonization cycles in man and beast: World Archaeology, v 8, p 249–261.Google Scholar
Downie, J E and White, J P, 1979, Balof Shelter, New Ireland: report on a small excavation: Records Australian Mus, v 31, p 763–802.Google Scholar
Green, R C, 1979, Lapita, in Jennings, J, ed, The prehistory of Polynesia: Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard Univ Press, p 27–60.Google Scholar
Groube, L, Chappell, J, Muke, J and Price, D, 1986, A 40,000 year-old human occupation site at Huon Peninsula, Papua New Guinea: Nature, v 324, p 453–455.Google Scholar
Kirch, P V, 1982, Advances in Polynesian prehistory: three decades in review: Advances in World Archaeology, v 1, p 51–97.Google Scholar
Kirch, P V, 1984, The evolution of the Polynesian chiefdoms: Cambridge, England, Cambridge Univ Press.Google Scholar
Kirch, P V, 1987, Lapita and Oceanic cultural origins: excavations in the Mussau Islands, Bismarck Archipelago, 1985: Jour Field Archaeology, v 14, p 163–180.Google Scholar
Kirch, P V and Hunt, T L, in press, The spatial and temporal boundaries of the Lapita cultural complex, in Kirch, P V and Hunt, T L, eds, Lapita archaeology: A critical review: Burke Mus Research Rept, Seattle, Univ Washington.Google Scholar
Specht, J, Lilley, I and Normu, J, 1981, Radiocarbon dates from west New Britain, Papua New Guinea: Australian Archaeology, v 12, p 13–15.Google Scholar
Spriggs, M, 1984, The Lapita cultural complex: origins, distribution, contemporaries, and successors: Jour Pacific History, v 19, p 202–223.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Becker, B, 1986, High-precision decadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–2500 bc, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 863–910.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, G W and Braziunas, T, 1986, Radiocarbon age calibration of marine samples back to 9000 cal bp, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no. 2B, p 980–1021.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Polach, H A, 1977, Discussion: Reporting of 14C data: Radiocarbon, v 19, no. 3, p 355–363.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M and Reimer, P J, 1986, A computer program for radiocarbon age calibration, in Stuiver, M and Kra, R S, eds, Internatl 14C conf, 12th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 28, no 2B, p 1022–1030.Google Scholar