Hostname: page-component-669899f699-g7b4s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T15:54:06.891Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

THE PROGRESS OF 14C-AMS ANALYSIS FOR ULTRA-SMALL SAMPLES AT XI’AN AMS CENTER

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2023

Hua Du Open the ORCID record for Hua Du [Opens in a new window] ,
Yunchong Fu ,
Peng Cheng Open the ORCID record for Peng Cheng [Opens in a new window] ,
Haiyan Zhao Open the ORCID record for Haiyan Zhao [Opens in a new window] ,
Yaoyao Hou ,
Xiaohu Xiong ,
Huachun Gu  and
Ling Yang
Hua Du*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China
Yunchong Fu*
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Peng Cheng
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China Institute of Global Environmental Change, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
Haiyan Zhao
Affiliation:
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China Xi’an Institute for Innovative Earth Environment Research, Xi’an 710061, China
Yaoyao Hou
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China
Xiaohu Xiong
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China
Huachun Gu
Affiliation:
Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China Xi’an Institute for Innovative Earth Environment Research, Xi’an 710061, China
Ling Yang
Affiliation:
State Key Laboratory of Loess and Quaternary Geology, Institute of Earth Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xi’an 710061, China Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Accelerator Mass Spectrometry Technology and Application, Xi’an AMS Center, Xi’an 710061, China
*
*Corresponding authors. Emails: [email protected] and [email protected]
*Corresponding authors. Emails: [email protected] and [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

As there exists a growing demand for chronological research and tracer applications using radiocarbon (14C) analyses of samples smaller than 100 μg C, a compact micro-specific hydrogen graphitization method has been developed at the Xi’an Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Center. This article describes the performance of the system and the mass of carbon background produced during ultra-small sample preparation. Furthermore, we discuss the results of contamination corrections and perform 14C analyses on small samples with known age or reference values. The results reveal that our 14C analysis of ultra-small samples of 10–100 μg C can obtain accurate and reliable results, and the micro-scale 14C-AMS analysis technique meets our research objectives for dating and tracer applications.

Keywords

AMSgraphitization reactorradiocarbon background correctionradiocarbonultra-small samples
Type
Conference Paper
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 66 , Issue 5: 24th Radiocarbon and 10th 14C & Archaeology, Zurich, Sept. 11–16, 2022 Proceedings Part 1 of 2 , October 2024 , pp. 1087 - 1104
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

Selected Papers from the 24th Radiocarbon and 10th Radiocarbon & Archaeology International Conferences, Zurich, Switzerland, 11–16 Sept. 2022

References

REFERENCES

Berstan, R, Stott, AW, Minnitt, S, Ramsey, BC, Hedges, REM, Evershed, RP. 2008. Direct dating of pottery from its organic residues: new precision using compound specific carbon isotopes. Antiquity 82:702–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buchholz, BA, Spalding, KL. 2010. Year of birth determination using radiocarbon dating of dental enamel. Surf Interface Anal. 42(5):398–401. doi: 10.1002/sia.3093 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casanova, E, Knowles, TDJ, Bayliss, A, Dunne, J, Barański, MZ, Denaire, A et al. (2020). Accurate compound-specific 14C dating of archaeological pottery vessels. Nature 580:506–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherkinsky, A., Prasad, G.V. R., Dvoracek, D.K. 2013. AMS measurement of samples smaller than 300 μg at Center for Applied Isotope Studies, University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 294:87–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook, GT, Dunbar, E, Black, SM, Xu, S. 2006. A preliminary assessment of age at death determination using the nuclear weapons testing 14C activity of dentine and enamel. Radiocarbon 48:305–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devièse, T, Stafford, TW, Waters, MR, Wathen, C, Comeskey, D, Becerra-Valdivia, L, Higham, T. 2018. Increasing accuracy for the radiocarbon dating of sites occupied by the first Americans. Quaternary Science Reviews 198:171–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Druffel, ERM, Zhang, D, Xu, X, Ziolkowski, LA, Southon, JR, Santos, GM, Trumbore, SE. 2010. Compound-specific radiocarbon analyses of phospholipid fatty acids and n-alkanes in ocean sediments. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1215–1223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eglinton, TI, Aluwihare, LI, Bauer, JE, Druffel, ERM, McNichol, AP. 1996. Gas chromatographic isolation of individual compounds from complex matrices for radiocarbon dating. Analytical Chemistry 68:904−912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fahrni, SM, Wacker, L, Synal, HA, Szidat, S. 2013. Improving a gas ion source for 14C AMS. Nuc-lear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:320–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, XJ, Vonk, JE, Griffin, C, Zimov, N, Montluçon, DB, Wacker, L, Eglinton, TI. 2017. C variation of dissolved lignin in arctic river systems. ACS Earth and Space Chemistry 1(6):334–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, YC, Zhou, WJ, Du, H, Cheng, P, Zhao, XL, Liu, Q, Lu, XF, Zhao, WN. 2015. A preliminary study of small-mass radiocarbon sample measurement at Xi’an-AMS. Chinese Physics C 39(3):036202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hippe, K, Jansen, JD, Skov, DS et al. 2021. Cosmogenic in situ 14C-10Be reveals abrupt Late Holocene soil loss in the Andean Altiplano. Nature Communication 12:2546.Google Scholar
Hippe, K, Kober, F, Baur, H, Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Wieler, R. 2009. The current performance of the in situ 14C extraction line at ETH. Quaternary Geochronology 4:493–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Williams, AA, Smith, AM. 2004. Small-Mass AMS Radiocarbon Analysis at ANTARES. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, SH, Kelly, PB, Clifford, AJ. 2008. Biological/biomedical accelerator mass spectrometry targets. 2. Physical, morphological, and structural characteristics. Analytical Chemistry 80:7661–7669.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebl, J, Steier, P, Golser, R, Kutschera, W, Mair, K, Priller, A, Vonderhaid, I, Wild, EM. 2013. Carbon background and ionization yield of an AMS system during 14C measurements of microgram-size graphite samples. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 294:335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lifton, NA, Jull, AJT, Quade, J. 2001. A new extraction technique and production rate estimate for in-situ cosmogenic 14C in quartz. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65(12):1953–1969.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupkera, M, Hippeb, K, Wackerb, L, Steinemannb, O, Tikhomirovb, D, Madene, C, Haghipoura, N, Synal, HA. 2019. In-situ cosmogenic 14C analysis at ETH Zürich: Characterization and performance of a new extraction system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 457:30–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melchert, J, Stolz, A, Dewald, A, Gierga, M, Wischhöfer, P, Rethemeyer, J. 2019. Exploring sample size limits of AMS gas ion source 14C analysis at CologneAMS. Radiocarbon 61(6):1785–1793. doi: 10.1017/RDC.2019.143 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, GH, Briner, JB, Lifton, NA, Finkel, RC. 2006. Limited ice-sheet erosion and complex exposure histories derived from in situ cosmogenic 10Be, 26Al, and 14C on Baffin Island, Arctic Canada. Quaternary Geochronology 1(1):74–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pigati, JS, Lifton, NA, Jull, AJT, et al. 2010. A simplified in-situ cosmogenic 14C extraction system. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1236–1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearson, A, McNichol, AP, Schneider, RJ, Von Reden, KF and Zhang, Y. 1998. Microscale AMS 14C measurement at NOSAMS. Radiocarbon 40(1):61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, M, Szidat, S, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, HA, Wacker, L. 2010. Gaseous radiocarbon measurements of small samples. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:790–794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, HA, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV. Radiocarbon 49:307–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saitoh, H, et al. 2019. Estimation of birth year by radiocarbon dating of tooth enamel: approach to obtaining enamel powder. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 62:97–102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salehpour, M, Håkansson, K, Possnert, G. 2013. Accelerator mass spectrometry of ultra-small samples with applications in the biosciences. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Moore, RB, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Hinger, ϵ, Zhang, D. 2007a. AMS 14C sample preparation at the KCCAMS/UCI facility: status report and performance of small samples. Radiocarbon 49(2):255–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2007b. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:293–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Drenzek, NJ, Ziolkowski, LA, Druffel, ERM, Xu, XM, Zhang, D, Trumbore, S, Eglinton, TI, Hughen, KA. 2010. Blank assessment for ultra-small radiocarbon samples: chemical extraction and separation versus AMS. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):1322–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AM, Hua, Q, Williams, A, Levchenko, V, Yang, B. 2010. Developments in micro-sample 14C-AMS at the ANTARES AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):919–923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, AM, Hua, Q, Williams, AA, Thorpe, KJ. 2006. A novel laser-heated microfurnace for the preparation of microgram-sized AMS graphite targets. 19th International Radiocarbon Conference. Oxford, 3–7 April 2006. Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Arner, E, Westermark, PO, Bernard, S, Buchholz, BA, Bergmann, O, et al. 2008. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature 453:783–787.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spalding, KL, Bergmann, O, Alkass, K, Bernard, S, Salehpour, M, Huttner, HB, Bostro, E, Westerlund, I, et al. 2013. Dynamics of hippocampal neurogenesis in adult humans. Cell 153(6):1219–1227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steier, P, Liebl, J, Kutschera, W, Wild, EM, Golser, R. 2017. Preparation methods of μg carbon samples for 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 59(3):803–814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spindler, L, Comeskey, D, Chabai, V, Uthmeier, T, Buckley, M, Devièse, T, Higham, T. 2021. Dating the last Middle Palaeolithic of the Crimean Peninsula: new hydroxyproline AMS dates from the site of Kabazi II. Journal of Human Evolution 156:102996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Uhl, T, Luppold, W, Rottenbach, A, Scharf, A, Kritzler, K, Kretschmer, W. 2007. Development of an automatic gas handling system for microscale AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:303–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walker, BD, Xu, XM. 2019. An improved method for the sealed-tube zinc graphitization of microgram carbon samples and 14C AMS measurement. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 438:58–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walter, SRS, Gagnon, AR, Roberts, ML, McNichol, AP, Gaylord, MCL, Klein, E. 2015. Ultra-small graphitization reactors for ultra-microscale 14C analysis at the national ocean sciences accelerator mass spectrometry (NOSAMS) facility. Radiocarbon 57(1):109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welte, C, Hendriks, L, Wacker, L, Haghipour, N, Eglinton, TI, Günther, D, Synal, HA. 2018. Towards the limits: analysis of microscale 14C samples using EA-AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 437:66–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, X, Gao, P, Salamanca, EG. 2013. Ultra small-mass graphitization by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 55:608–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamane, M, Yokoyama, Y, Hirabayashi, S, Miyairi, Y, Ohkouchi, N, Aze, T. 2019. Small- to ultra-small-scale radiocarbon measurements using newly installed single-stage AMS at the University of Tokyo. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 455:238–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B, Smith, AM. 2017. Conventionally heated microfurnace for the graphitization of microgram-sized carbon samples. Radiocarbon 59(3):859–873.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, B, Smith, AM, Hua, Q. 2013. A cold finger cooling system for the efficient graphitisation of microgram-sized carbon samples. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:262–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Koizumi, M, Matsuzaki, H, Miyairi, Y, Ohkouchi, N. 2010. Developing ultra small-scale radiocarbon sample measurement at the university of Tokyo. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):310–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, YM, Huang, XY, Xie, SC. 2021. Compound specific carbon isotope composition of microbial phospholipid fatty acids reveal carbon cycling processes. Quaternary Sciences 41(4):877–892.Google Scholar
Zhao, MX, Meng, Y, Zhang, HL, Tao, SQ. 2014. Applications of compound-specific radiocarbon analysis in oceanography and environmental science. Acta Oceanologica Sinica 36(4):1–10. In Chinese.Google Scholar
Zhou, W, Lu, X, Wu, Z, Zhao, W, Huang, C, Li, L, Cheng, P, Xin, Z. 2007. New results on Xi’an-AMS and sample preparation systems at Xi’an-AMS center. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 262:135–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W, Wu, S, Lange, T, Lu, X, Cheng, P, Xiong, X, Cruz, R, Liu, Q, Fu, Y, Zhao, W. 2012. High-level 14C contamination and recovery at Xi’an AMS Center. Radiocarbon 54(2):187–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhou, W, Zhao, X, Lu, X, Liu, L, Wu, Z, Cheng, P, Zhao, W, Huang, C. 2006. The 3MV Multi-Element AMS in Xi’an, China: unique features and preliminary tests. Radiocarbon 48(2):285–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar