Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-lrblm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-18T23:58:03.946Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Progress in Radiocarbon Target Preparation at the Antares AMS Centre

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Q Hua ,
G E Jacobsen ,
U Zoppi ,
E M Lawson ,
A A Williams ,
A M Smith  and
M J McGann
Q Hua*
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
G E Jacobsen
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
U Zoppi
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
E M Lawson
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
A A Williams
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
A M Smith
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
M J McGann
Affiliation:
Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation, PMB 1, Menai NSW 2234, Australia
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We present routine methods of target preparation for radiocarbon analysis at the ANTARES Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) Centre, as well as recent developments which have decreased our procedural blank level and improved our ability to process small samples containing less than 200 μg of carbon. Routine methods of 14C sample preparation include sample pretreatment, CO2 extraction (combustion, hydrolysis and water stripping) and conversion to graphite (graphitization). A new method of cleaning glassware and reagents used in sample processing, by baking them under a stream of oxygen, is described. The results show significant improvements in our procedural blanks. In addition, a new graphitization system dedicated to small samples, using H2/Fe reduction of CO2, has been commissioned. The technical details of this system, the graphite yield and the level of fractionation of the targets are discussed.

Type
I. Becoming Better
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 43 , Issue 2A: Proceedings of the 17th International Radiocarbon Conference (Part 1 of 3) , 2001 , pp. 275 - 282
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Alderliesten, C, van der Borg, K, de Jong, AFM. 1998. Contamination and fractionation effects in AMS-measured 14C/12C and 13C/12C ratios of small samples. Radiocarbon 40(1):215–21.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Southon, JR. 1997. Corrections for contamination backgrounds in AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B123:208–13.Google Scholar
Brown, TA, Nelson, DE, Vogel, JS, Southon, JR. 1988. Improved collagen extraction by modified Longin method. Radiocarbon 30(2):171–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gillespie, R. 1991. Charcoal dating—oxidation is necessary for complete humic removal. Radiocarbon 33(2): 199.Google Scholar
Hoefs, J. Stable Isotope Geochemistry. Third Edition, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hotchkis, MAC, Fink, D, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Lawson, EM, Smith, AA, Tuniz, C. 1996. High-precision radiocarbon measurements at the ANTARES AMS Centre. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B113:457–60.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Jacobsen, GE, Zoppi, U, Lawson, EM. 2000. Bomb radiocarbon in annual tree rings from Thailand and Australia. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B172:359–65.Google Scholar
Jacobsen, GE, Hua, Q, Tarshishi, J, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Lawson, EM, Smith, AM, Tuniz, C. 1997. AMS radiocarbon analysis of microsamples. In: Handbook of the Sixth Australasian Archaeometry Conference, 10–13 February 1997, Sydney, Australia. p. 36.Google Scholar
Law, IA, Hedges, REM. 1989. A semi-automated bone pretreatment system and the pretreatment of older and contaminated samples. Radiocarbon 31(3):247–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, EM, Elliott, G, Fallon, J, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Lee, P, Smith, AM, Tuniz, C, Zoppi, U. 2000. AMS at ANTARES — the first 10 years. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B172: 95–9.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230:241–2.Google Scholar
McNicholl, AP, Jones, GA. 1991. Measuring 14C in seawater $SGCO2 by Accelerator Mass Spectrometry, WHP Operations and Methods. In: Joyce, T, Corry, C, Stalcup, M, editors. 1991. WOCE operations manual. Part 3.1.2, Requirements for WHP data reporting. Woods Hole, Massachusetts: WHPO Publication. 90–1:71 p.Google Scholar
Nadeau, MJ, Kieser, WE, Beukens, RP, Litherland, AE. 1987. Quantum mechanical effects on sputter source isotope fractionation. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B29:83–6.Google Scholar
Regnell, J. 1992. Preparing pollen concentrates for AMS Dating—a methodological study from a hard-water lake in southern Sweden. Boreas 21:373–7.Google Scholar
Smith, AM, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Jacobsen, GE, Lawson, EM, Shying, M, Tuniz, C, Watt, GC, Fallon, J, Ellis, PJ. 1994. Equipment and methodology for high precision, high throughput 14C AMS analyses at ANTARES. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B92:122–8.Google Scholar
Tuniz, C, Fink, D, Hotchkis, MAC, Jacobsen, GE, Lawson, EM, Smith, AM, Hua, Q. 1997. Research and measurement program at the ANTARES AMS facility. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B123:73–8.Google Scholar
van der Kaars, W. 1997. Modification of the standard palynological procedure (personal communication).Google Scholar
Vandeputte, K, Moens, L, Dams, R. 1996. Improved sealed-tube combustion of organic samples to CO2 for stable isotopic analysis, radiocarbon dating and percent carbon determinations. Analytical Letters 29(15): 2761–73.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instuments and Methods in Physics Research B5:289–93Google Scholar