Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T02:47:36.961Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Probability and Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Christopher Bronk Ramsey
Christopher Bronk Ramsey*
Affiliation:
Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford, 0X1 3QJ, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Statistical analysis is becoming much more widely used in conjunction with radiocarbon dating. In this paper I discuss the impact of Bayesian analysis (using computer programs such as OxCal) on archaeological research. In addition to simple analysis, the method has implications for the planning of dating projects and the assessment of the reliability of dates in their context.

A new formalism for describing chronological models is introduced here: the Chronological Query Language (CQL), an extension of the model definitions found in the program OxCal.

New methods of Bayesian analysis can be used to overcome some of the inherent biases in the uncertainty estimates of scientific dating methods. Most of these methods, including 14C, uranium series and thermoluminescence (TL), tend to favor some calendar dates over others. 14C calibration overcomes the problem where this is possible, but a Bayesian approach can be used more generally.

Type
Part 1: Methods
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 40 , Issue 1: 16th International Radiocarbon Conference 16-20,1997 Groningen , 1997 , pp. 461 - 474
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bayliss, A., Bronk Ramsey, C. and McCormac, F. G. 1997 Dating Stonehenge. Proceedings of the British Academy 92: 39–59.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1994 Analysis of chronological information and radiocarbon calibration: The program OxCal. Archaeological Computing Newsletter 41: 11–16.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995a Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: The OxCal program. In Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F. and Scott, E. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 37(2): 425–430.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995b OxCal [computer program] Manual. Version 2.18. Oxford, Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. Available via Internet at URL http://units.ox.ac.uk/de-partments/rlaha/oxcal/oxcal.html.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. and Allen, M. J. 1995 Analysis of the radiocarbon dates and their archaeological significance. In Cleal, R. M. J., Walker, K. E. and Montague, R., eds., Stonehenge in its Landscape: Twentieth-Century Excavations. London, English Heritage: 526–535.Google Scholar
Buck, C. E., Kenworthy, J. B., Litton, C. D. and Smith, A. F. M. 1991 Combining archaeological and radiocarbon information: A Bayesian approach to calibration. Antiquity 65: 808–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buck, C. E., Litton, C. D. and Smith, A. F. M. 1992 Calibration of radiocarbon results pertaining to related archaeological events. Journal of Archaeological Science 19: 497–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christen, J. A., Clymo, R. S. and Litton, C. D. 1995 A Bayesian approach to the use of 14C dates in the estimation of the age of peat. In Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F. and Scott, E. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 37(2): 431–442.Google Scholar
Gelfand, A. E. and Smith, A. F. M. 1990 Sampling based approaches to calculating marginal densities. Journal of the American Statistical Association 85: 398–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harris, E. C. 1989 Principles of Archaeological Stratigraphy. 2nd ed. London, Academic Press: 170 p.Google Scholar
Litton, C. D. and Buck, C. E. 1995 The Bayesian approach to the interpretation of the archaeological data. Archaeometry 37(1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Braziunas, T. F. 1993 Modeling atmospheric 14C influences and 14C ages of marine samples to 10,000 BC. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 137–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar