Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-767nl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-15T21:55:14.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Preparative 2D-Chromatography Method for Compound-Specific Radiocarbon Analysis of Dicarboxylic Acids in Aerosols

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

S M Fahrni ,
M Ruff ,
L Wacker ,
N Perron ,
H W Gäggeler  and
S Szidat
S M Fahrni
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
M Ruff
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland Ion Beam Physics, ETH Hönggerberg, Zurich, Switzerland
L Wacker
Affiliation:
Ion Beam Physics, ETH Hönggerberg, Zurich, Switzerland
N Perron
Affiliation:
Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
H W Gäggeler
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen, Switzerland
S Szidat*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

There is a great scientific demand for an assessment of the sources and formation processes of atmospheric carbonaceous aerosols since they strongly influence the global radiation balance and affect public health. Much attention in atmospheric studies has been paid to dicarboxylic acids (DCAs) due to their abundance at substantially different sites and their potential influence on cloud formation processes. Nevertheless, sources of oxalic acid (HOOCCOOH) and other DCAs are not well understood yet. In order to quantify contributions of fossil and non-fossil sources, a method for the preparative separation of oxalic acid and other DCAs from aerosols for compound-specific radiocarbon analysis (CSRA) has been developed. This method consists of a water extraction of aerosols collected on quartz-fiber filters followed by 2 consecutive liquid chromatography (LC) steps on different chromatography columns (2D-chromatography). Through the use of aqueous, completely non-organic eluents and single injections into liquid chromatography, low blank levels are achieved with total oxalic acid recoveries of up to 66%. Upon separation, 14C measurements of small samples (containing typically 10–20 μg carbon) are conducted at the gas ion source of the 200kV accelerator mass spectrometry facility MICADAS. The method is verified with processed reference materials, artificial mixtures of oxalic acid with typical matrix components, and a standard addition of ambient aerosols. Two exemplary field samples show dominant non-fossil sources of oxalic acid.

Type
Methods, Applications, and Developments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 752 - 760
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Fahrni, SM, Gäggeler, HW, Hajdas, I, Ruff, M, Szidat, S, Wacker, L. 2010. Direct measurements of small 14C samples after oxidation in quartz tubes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):787–9.Google Scholar
Fisseha, R, Saurer, M, Jäggi, M, Siegwolf, RTW, Dommen, J, Szidat, S, Samburova, V, Baltensperger, U. 2009. Determination of primary and secondary sources of organic acids and carbonaceous aerosols using stable carbon isotopes. Atmospheric Environment 43(2):431–7.Google Scholar
Hori, M, Ohta, S, Murao, N, Yamagata, S. 2003. Activation capability of water soluble organic substances as CCN. Aerosol Science 34(4):419–48.Google Scholar
Hsieh, L-Y, Kuo, S-C, Chen, C-L, Tsai, YI. 2007. Origin of low-molecular-weight dicarboxylic acids and their concentration and size distribution variation in suburban aerosol. Atmospheric Environment 41(31):6648–61.Google Scholar
Kawamura, K, Ikushima, K. 1993. Seasonal changes in the distribution of dicarboxylic acids in the urban atmosphere. Environmental Science and Technology 27(10):2227–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawamura, K, Usukura, K. 1993. Distributions of low molecular weight dicarboxylic acids in the north pacific aerosol samples. Journal of Oceanography 49(3):271–83.Google Scholar
Legrand, M, Preunkert, S, Oliveira, T, Pio, CA, Hammer, S, Gelencsér, A, Kasper-Giebl, A, Laj, P. 2007. Origin of C2–C5 dicarboxylic acids in the European atmosphere inferred from year-round aerosol study conducted at a west-east transect. Journal of Geophysical Research 112: D23S07, doi:10.1029/2006JD008019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limbeck, A, Handler, M, Neuberger, B, Klatzer, B, Puxbaum, H. 2005. Carbon-specific analysis of humic-like substances in atmospheric aerosol and precipitation samples. Analytical Chemistry 77(22):7288–93.Google Scholar
Mandalakis, M, Gustafsson, Ö, Alsberg, T, Egebäck, A-L, Reddy, CM, Xu, L, Klanova, J, Holoubek, I, Stephanou, EG. 2005. Contribution of biomass burning to atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons at three European background sites. Environmental Science and Technology 39(9):2976–82.Google Scholar
Matsumoto, K, Kawamura, K, Uchida, M, Shibata, Y, Yoneda, M. 2001. Compound specific radiocarbon and 13C measurements of fatty acids in a continental aerosol sample. Geophysical Research Letters 28(24):4587–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV. Radiocarbon 49(2):307–14.Google Scholar
Ruff, M, Szidat, S, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2010. Gaseous radiocarbon measurements of small samples. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):790–4.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A, Döbeli, M, Jacob, S, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2004. Radiocarbon AMS towards its low-energy limits. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:339–45.Google Scholar
Szidat, S, Jenk, TM, Gäggeler, HW, Synal, H-A, Fisseha, R, Baltensperger, U, Kalberer, M, Samburova, V, Wacker, L, Saurer, M, Schwikowski, M, Hajdas, I. 2004. Source apportionment of aerosols by 14C measurements in different carbonaceous particle fractions. Radiocarbon 46(1):475–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szidat, S, Ruff, M, Perron, N, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A, Hallquist, M, Shannigrahi, AS, Yttri, KE, Dye, C, Simpson, D. 2009. Fossil and non-fossil sources of organic carbon (OC) and elemental carbon (EC) in Göteborg, Sweden. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9(5):1521–35.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, H-A. 2010. Bats: a new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):976–9.Google Scholar