Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T03:48:15.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Origin of Carbonaceous Particles in American Cities: Results of Radiocarbon “Dating” and Chemical Characterization1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

L A Currie
Affiliation:
Center for Analytical Chemistry, National Bureau of Standards, Washington, DC 20234
G A Klouda
Affiliation:
Global Geochemistry Corporation, Canoga Park, CA 91303
R E Continetti
Affiliation:
Global Geochemistry Corporation, Canoga Park, CA 91303
I R Kaplan
Affiliation:
Global Geochemistry Corporation, Canoga Park, CA 91303
W W Wong
Affiliation:
Global Geochemistry Corporation, Canoga Park, CA 91303
T G Dzubay
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
R K Stevens
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Research Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the past three years radiocarbon assay has emerged as a primary tool in the quantitative assignment of sources of urban and rural particulate pollution. Its use in several major field studies has come about because of its excellent (fossil/biogenic) discriminating power, because of advances in 14C measurements of small samples, and because of the increased significance of carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere. The problem is especially important in the cities, where increased concentrations of fine particles lead to pollution episodes characterized by poor visibility and changes in the radiation balance (absorption, scattering), and immediate and possibly long-term health effects. Efforts in source apportionment in such affected areas have been based on emissions inventories, dispersion modeling, and receptor modeling – ie, chemical and physical (and statistical) characterization of particles collected at designated receptor sites. It is in the last category that 14C has become quite effective in helping to resolve particle sources. Results are presented for studies carried out in Los Angeles, Denver, and Houston which incorporated 14C measurements, inorganic and organic chemical characterization, and receptor modeling. The 14C data indicated wide ranging contributions of biogenic and fossil carbon sources – eg, <10% to 60% contemporary (biogenic) in Houston – depending on meteorological, biological, and anthropological activity. The combined (chemical, isotopic, statistical) data point to sources such as vehicles, wood combustion, power plants, and vegetation.

Type
VI. Anthropogenic 14C Variations
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Brenner, S, Brewer, RL, Kaplan, IP, Wong, WW, 1980, Collection and analysis of organic and inorganic components in particulates and volatiles in the Southern California air basin. final report, submitted to the Electric Power Research Inst.Google Scholar
Cooper, JA and Malek, D, ed, 1981, Residential solid fuels, Oregon Graduate Center, Portland.Google Scholar
Core, JE and Terraglio, FP, 1978, Field and slash burning particulate characterization: the search for unique natural tracers: Air Pollution Control Assoc report.Google Scholar
Countess, RJ, Cadle, SH, Groblicki, PJ and Wolff, GT, 1981, Chemical analysis of size-segregated samples of Denver's ambient particulate, J Air Pollution Control Assoc, v 31, p 247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Courtney, WS, Tesch, JW, Russworm, GM, Stevens, RK and Dzubay, TG, 1980, Characterization of the Denver aerosol between December 1978 and December 1979, Air Pollution Control Assoc, Paper 80-58.1 (Montreal meeting).Google Scholar
Currie, LA, Gerlach, RW, and Lewis, CW, 1982, The aerosol simulation data set, in Stevens, RK, ed, Receptor Modeling Workshop - Quail Roost II, US Environmental Protection Agency, ms.Google Scholar
Currie, LA, Klouda, GA and Cooper, JA, 1980, Mini-radiocarbon measurements, chemical selectivity, and the impact of man on environmental pollution and climate, in Stuiver, Minze and Kra, Renee, eds, Internatl Radiocarbon conf, 10th, Proc: Radiocarbon, v 22, p 349362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, LA and Klouda, GA, 1982, Counters, accelerators and chemistry in Counters, accelerators and chemistry. ACS Sympos Series, No. 176, p 159.Google Scholar
Currie, LA, Kunen, SM., Voorhees, KJ, Murphy, RB, and Koch, WF, 1978, Analysis of carbonaceous particulates and characterization of their sources by low-level radiocarbon counting and pyrolysis/gas chromatography/mass spectrometry, in Novakov, T, ed. Conf on carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere; Berkeley, Univ of California Press, p 3648.Google Scholar
Currie, LA and Murphy, RB, 1977, Origin and residence times of atmospheric pollutants: application of 14C, in Methods and Standards for Environmental Measurement, Kirchoff, WH, ed, NBS Spec Pub 464, NBS, Washington, DC Nov, p 439.Google Scholar
Dzubay, TG, Stevens, RK, Lewis, CW, Hern, D, Courtney, WJ, Tesch, JW and Mason, MA, 1982, Visibility and aerosol composition in Houston, Texas: Environ Sci Tech, 16, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eganhouse, RP, Simoneit, BRT and Kaplan, IR, 1981, Extracted organic matter in urban stormwater runoff: II Molecular Characterization, Environ Sci Tech, 15, 315.Google ScholarPubMed
Groblicki, PJ, Cadle, SH, Ang, CC, and Mulawa, PA, 1982, Interlaboratory comparison of methods for the analysis of organic and elemental carbon in atmospheric particulate matter, presented at the National Sympos on Recent Advances in Pollutant Monitoring of Ambient Air and Stationary Sources, ms.Google Scholar
Heisler, SL, Henry, RC, Watson, JG and Hidy, GM, 1980, The 1978 Denver winter haze study, Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Assoc, Detroit, Michigan, report.Google Scholar
Kaden, DA and Thilly, WG, Mutagenic activity of fossil fuel combustion products, in Novakov, T, ed, Conf on carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere: Berkeley, Univ California Press, v 193.Google Scholar
Mitchell, RI, Henry, WM, Anderson, NC, Thompson, RJ and Burton, RM, 1977, Megavolume respirable particulate sampler (Mark II), presented at the 70th Annual Meeting of the Air Pollution Control Association, Toronto, Canada, June 20, ms.Google Scholar
Novakov, T, ed, 1978, Conference on carbonaceous particles in the atmosphere, Proc: LBL-9037 (Lawrence Berkeley Lab).Google Scholar
Polach, HA and Ferrari, LM, 1982, Tracing particulate fallout by carbon isotopes, the urban atmosphere - Sydney, a case study, CSIRO, North Hyde Australia, in press.Google Scholar
Rosen, H, Hansen, ADA, Dod, RL and Novakov, T, 1980, Soot in urban atmospheres: determination by an optical absorption technique, Science, v 208, p 741.Google Scholar
Sayre, EV, Harbottle, G, Stoenner, RW, Otlet, RL and Evans, GB, 1981, The use of the small gas proportional counters for the carbon-14 measurement of very small samples: Internatl Sympos on Methods of Low-Level Counting and Spectrometry, IAEA, Vienna.Google Scholar
Stevens, RK and Pace, TG, 1983, Status of source apportionment methods: Quail Roost II, Jour Air Pollution Control Assoc, in press.Google Scholar
Wolff, GT, Countess, RJ, Groblicki, PJ, Ferman, MA, Cadle, SH and Muhlbaier, JL, 1981, Visibility-reducing species in the Denve. brown cloud, II sources and temporal patterns, Atmos Environ, v 15, p 2485.Google Scholar
Wolff, GT and Klimisch, RL, eds, 1982, Particulate carbon: atmospheric life cycle: New York, Plenum Press.Google Scholar