Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T21:13:44.341Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

New Radiocarbon Dates for the Baden Culture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Tünde Horváth ,
S éva Svingor  and
Mihály Molnár
Tünde Horváth
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Archaeological Institute, H-1014, úri. u. 49, Budapest, Hungary. Email: [email protected]
S éva Svingor
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), H-4001, Pf. 51, Debrecen, Hungary
Mihály Molnár
Affiliation:
Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Nuclear Research (ATOMKI), H-4001, Pf. 51, Debrecen, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In 2001–2002, a settlement of the Baden culture was excavated in the vicinity of Balatonoszöd. During the rescue excavation along the M7 highway, in an area of 100,000 m2, 2800 pits dug into the subsoil, 320 hearths, and cultural layers rich in material were discovered. The material of the Baden culture represents phases IB–IC (Boleraz), IIA (Transitional), IIB–III (Early Classical) according to Němejcová-Pavúková's (1981, 1998) typological system. We took 20 samples from the large number of human and animal skeletons for radiocarbon dating, of which 16 measurements were successful. These results provide absolute dates for a Baden culture settlement with the longest occupation and the largest excavated surface in Hungary. This provides an opportunity to review the chronological position of the Baden culture, with special emphasis on its beginning and end.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 50 , Issue 3 , 2008 , pp. 447 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © 2008 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Banner, J. 1956. Die Péceler Kultur. Archaeologica Hungarica 35:206–9. In German.Google Scholar
Barna, P. 2003. Késo rézkori település Nagykanizsa-Billa lelohelyen [Late Copper Age Baden settlement from Nagykanizsa-Billa]. Zalai Múzeum 12:97–142. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Bondár, M. 2002. A badeni kultúra kutatási helyzete Magyarországon (Vázlat). Studia Archaeologica 8:7–30. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
de Capitani, A, Deschler-Erb, S, Leuzinger, U, Marti-Grädel, E, Schibler, J. 2002. Die jungsteinzeitliche Seeufersiedlung Arbon-Bleiche 3. Funde. Archäologie im Thurgau 11. In German.Google Scholar
Childe, G. 1925. The Dawn of European Civilization. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chropovský, B, editor. 1973. Symposium über die Entstehung und Chronologie der Badener Kultur. Bratislava, 1973. In German.Google Scholar
Csongor, É, Hertelendi, E. 1986. Low-level counting facility for 14C dating. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 17(5–6):493–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csongor, É, Szabó, I, Hertelendi, E. 1982. Preparation of counting gas of proportional counters for radiocarbon dating. Radiochemical and Radioanalytical Letters 55:303–7.Google Scholar
Figler, A, Bartosiewicz, L, Füleky, Gy, Hertelendi, E. 1997. Copper Age settlement and the Danube Water system: a case study from north-western Hungary. In: Chapman, J, Dolukhanov, P, editors. Landscapes in Flux: Central and Eastern Europe in Antiquity. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 209–30.Google Scholar
Forenbaher, S. 1993. Radiocarbon dates and absolute chronology of the central European Early Bronze Age. Antiquity 67(255):218–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertelendi, E. 1990. Sources of random error in the Debrecen radiocarbon laboratory. Radiocarbon 32(3):283–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertelendi, E, Csongor, É, Záborszky, L, Molnár, J, Gál, J, Györffi, M, Nagy, S. 1989. A counter system for high-precision 14C dating. Radiocarbon 31(3):399–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, LA. 2001. Die relativchronologische Position des Protoboleraz-Horizontes aufgrund seineer südlichen Komponenten. In: Roman, P, editor. Ein Vorgeschichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der Unteren Donau. Studia Danubiana ser. Cernavoda III-Boleráz Symposium 2001. Bucharest: Institute of Thracology. In German. p 459–516. In German.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2002a. Rejtozködo múlt: Rézkori álarc az M7–esen [Hidden past: Copper Age mask from the M7 highway]. Élet és Tudomány 23(7):711–4. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2002b. Késo rézkori agyagmaszk Balatonoszödrol [Late Copper Age clay mask from Balatonoszod]. Õsrégészeti levelek 4:31–40. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2002c. A unique anthropomorphic representation of Baden culture. Antaeus 25:423–6.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2004a. A new human representation from the Baden culture: a mask from Balatonoszöd. Acta Archaeologica Hungarica 55:179–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, T. 2004b. Late Copper Age settlement in Balatonoszöd, Hungary. ActaArchCarp 39:59–85.Google Scholar
Horváth, T. 2006. Állattemetkezések Balatonoszöd-Temetoi dulo badeni településen [Animal burials from the Late Copper Age settlement Balatonoszöd]. Somogyi Múzeumok Közleményei 17:107–52. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Horváth, T, Zoffmann, Zs. 2004. Emberi vázakat tartalmazó objektumok Balatonõszöd-Temetoi dulo badeni településérol [Settlement burials from Balatonoszöd-Temetoi dulo]. Somogyi Múzeumok Közleményei 16: 71–127. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Horváth, T, Juhász, I, Köhler, K. 2003. Zwei Brunnen der Balaton-Lasinja Kultur von Balatonoszöd. Antaeus 23:265–301. In German.Google Scholar
Horváth, T, Svingor, SÉ, Molnár, M. 2006. Újabb adatok a baden-péceli kultúra keltezéséhez [New radiocarbon dates for the Baden-Pécel culture]. Archeometriai Muhely 2006(3): 19–30. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Horváth, T, Herbich, K, Gherdán, K, Vasáros, Zs. 2007. Häuser der Badener Kultur am Fundort Balatonoszöd-Temetoi dulo. Acta Archaeologica Hungarica 58:43–105. In German.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horváth, T, Gherdán, K, Herbich, K, Hajnalova, M, Hlozek, M, Prokes, M. 2008. Techno-tipológiai megfigyelések a badeni kultúra fazekasárúin Balatonoszöd-Temetoi dulo badeni településen [Techno-typological investigations on the pottery finds of Balatonoszöd, settlement of the Baden culture]. MΩMOS 4. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1958. Rézkori sztratigráfia Székely község határában [Copper Age stratigraphy in the outskirts of the village Székely]. Archértesíto 85:3–6. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1963. Die Péceler (Badener) Kultur und Anatolien. Studia Archaeologica II. Budapest. In German.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 2001. Die Protoboleráz phase an der Grenze von zwei Epochen. In: Roman, P, editor. Ein Vorgeschichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der Unteren Donau. Studia Danubiana ser. Cernavoda III-Boleráz Symposium 2001. Bucharest: Institute of Thracology. p 385–422. In German.Google Scholar
Korek, J. 1983. Közép-Kelet-Európa a rézkor végén [Central eastern Europe at the end of Copper Age]. Unpublished PhD manuscript. Budapest. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Korfmann, M, Kromer, B. 1993. Zur Chronologie von Demircihüyük, Bešik-Tepe und Troia – eine zwischenbilanz zur Chronologie dreier orte in Westanatolien. Studia Troica 3:135–73. In German.Google Scholar
Köninger, J, Kolb, M, Schlichtherle, H. 2001. Elemente von Boleráz und Baden in den Feuchtbodensiedlungen des Südwestdeutschen Alpenvorlandes und ihre mögliche Rolle im Endneolithikums. In: Roman, P, editor. Ein Vorgeschichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der Unteren Donau. Studia Danubiana ser. Cernavoda III-Boleráz Symposium 2001. Bucharest: Institute of Thracology. In German. p 641–73. In German.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1971. New method of collagen extraction for radiocarbon dating. Nature 230(5291):241–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Makkay, J. 1996. C-14 chronology: eastern Europe. Acta Archaeologica Kobenhavn 67:219–25.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 2003. Õsrégészeti kutatások Magyarországon az utóbbi években. Az újkokor és a rézkor [Prehistoric archaeology in Hungary in recent years. The Neolithic and Copper Age]. Jósa András Múzeum Értesítoje 45: 27–63. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Maran, J. 1998. Die Badener Kultur und der ägäisch-anatolische Bereich: eine Neubewertung eines alten Forschungsproblems. Germania 76:497–525. In German.Google Scholar
Mauss, M. 2004. Szociológia és Antropológia [Sociology and anthropology]. Budapest: Osiris. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Němejcová-Pavúková, V. 1981. Nacrt periodizácie Badenskej kultúry a jej chronologichych vzatov k ju hovychodnej Europe [An outline of the periodical system of the Baden culture and its chronological relations to southeast Europe]. Slovenská Archaeologica 29:261–96. In Slovak.Google Scholar
Němejcová-Pavúková, V. 1998. Die Badener Kultur. In: Preuss, J, editor. Das Neolithikum in Mitteleuropa. Kulturen-Wirtschaft-Umwelt vom 6. bis 3. Jahrtausend v.u.Z. Band 1/2. Weissbach: Beier and Beran Archaologische Fachliteratur Weissbach. p 383–400. In German.Google Scholar
Neustupný, E. 1968. Absolute chronology of the Neolithic and Aeneolithic periods in central and south-eastern Europe. Slovenská Archaeologica 16: 19–56.Google Scholar
Pavelčík, J. 1988. Zur Frage der chronologischen Stellung der Badener Kultur. Germania 66:142–9. In German.Google Scholar
Petrasch, J. 1984. Die absolute Datierung der Badener Kultur aus der Sicht des süddeutschen Jungneolithikums. Germania 62:269–87. In German.Google Scholar
Pétrequin, P, Arbogast, RM, Pétrequin, AM, van Willigen, S, Bailly, M. 2006. Premiers chariots, premiers araires. La diffusion de la traction animale en Europa pendant les IVe et IIIe ère. Paris: Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre d'études Préhistoire, Antiquité, Moyen Âge. CRA 29 Monographies. In French.Google Scholar
Raczky, P. 1995. New data on the absolute chronology of the Copper Age in the Carpathian Basin. In: Kovács, T, editor. Neuere Daten zur Siedlungsgeschichte und Chronologie der Kupferzeit des Karpatenbeckens. Inventaria Prehistorica Hungariae 7:51–60.Google Scholar
Raczky, P, Hertelendi, E, Veres, M. 1994. La datation absolue des cultures des tells de l'Age du Bronze en Hongrie. In: Coudrot, J-L, Thevenot, J-P, editors. Le bel Age du Bronze en Hongrie. Glux-en-Glenne: Centre Européen d'Archéologie du Mont-Beuvray. p 42–7. In French.Google Scholar
Raetzel-Fabian, D, Furholt, M. 2006. Frühbadener Elemente im Nelithikum Mitteldeutschlands: die “Schöninger Gruppe.” URL: www.jungsteinSITE.de. Accessed 15 June 2006.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Reményi, L. 2003. A gazdálkodás és életmód kérdései a bronzkori Kárpát-medencében [Husbandry and lifestyle in the Bronze Age Carpathian Basin]. In: Viga, Gy, Holló, SzA, Schwalm, E, editors. Vándorutak –Múzeumi Örökség. Tanulmányok Bodó Sándor tiszteletére, 60. Budapest: Születésnapja alkalmából. p 267–75. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Renfrew, C. 1969. The autonomy of the south-east European Copper Age. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 35. p 12–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roman, P, editor. 2001. Ein Vorgeschichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der Unteren Donau. Studia Danubiana ser. Cernavoda III-Boleráz Symposium 2001. Bucharest: Institute of Thracology. In German.Google Scholar
Sherratt, A. 2003. The Baden (Pécel) culture and Anatolia: perspectives on a cultural transformation. In: Jerem, E, Raczky, P, editors. Morgenrot der Menschheitsgeschichte in Mittel- und Südosteuropa. Festschrift für N. Kalicz zum 75 Geburtstag. Budapest: Archeolingua. p 415–29.Google Scholar
Siklósi, Zs, Sófalvi, A. 2004. Balatonlelle-Országúti dulo. Somogyi Múzeumok Közlémenyei 16:56. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Stadler, P, Draxler, S, Friesinger, H, Kutschera, W, Priller, W, Rom, W, Steier, P, Wild, EM. 2001. Absolute chronology for early civilisations in Austria and central Europe using 14C dating with accelerator mass spectrometry with special results for the absolute chronology of the Baden culture. In: Roman, P, editor. Ein Vorgeschichtliches Phänomen zwischen dem Oberrhein und der Unteren Donau. Studia Danubiana ser. Cernavoda III-Boleráz Symposium 2001. Bucharest: Institute of Thracology. p 541–63.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ. 1993. Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. Radiocarbon 35(1):215–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szabó, JJ. 1983. Késorézkori telep és középkori falu leletmentése Gyöngyöshalász határában. Agria 19:5–35. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Szabó, JJ. 1997. Szihalom-Sóhajtó. Régészeti füzetek 49: 27. In Hungarian.Google Scholar
Wild, EM, Stadler, P, Bondár, M, Draxler, S, Friesinger, H, Kutshera, W, Priller, A, Rom, W, Ruttkay, E, Steier, P. 2001. New chronological frame for the Young Neolithic Baden culture in central Europe (4th millenium BC) Radiocarbon 43(2B):1057–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar