Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:24:01.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Graphitization System for Radiocarbon Dating with AMS in the Dendrochronological Laboratory at AGH-UST Kraków

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2018

Marek Krąpiec ,
Andrzej Rakowski ,
Matthias Huels Open the ORCID record for Matthias Huels [Opens in a new window] ,
Damian Wiktorowski  and
Christian Hamann
Marek Krąpiec
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology (AGH-UST), Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Andrzej Rakowski*
Affiliation:
Institute of Physics - CSE, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 22B str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Matthias Huels
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Laboratory, University of Kiel, Max-Eyth-Str. 11-13, 24118 Kiel, Germany
Damian Wiktorowski
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology (AGH-UST), Mickiewicza Av. 30, 30-059 Krakow, Poland
Christian Hamann
Affiliation:
Leibniz-Laboratory, University of Kiel, Max-Eyth-Str. 11-13, 24118 Kiel, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A new vacuum system for the preparation of graphite samples for radiocarbon (14C) measurement using an accelerator mass spectrometer (AMS) was constructed at the Dendrochronological Laboratory in AGH-UST Kraków. The central part of the system is a manual vacuum line for the production of graphite from carbon dioxide for subsequent AMS measurements. The graphitization system can handle up to five samples simultaneously, and the process lasts for approximately 1 hour. The graphitization line was built to support the preparation of wood samples for a project dedicated to dating a subfossil tree from the Younger Dryas period. For this purpose, the chemical preparation procedure for wood samples was optimized to obtain more reliable results. This includes the extraction of α-cellulose to increase the precision of the age determination. The performance of the system was tested with NIST OxII, IAEA standards (IAEA C3, C5, C6, and C8), and background samples. The results of the 13 samples of subfossil wood were tested and are presented. The methodology gives good reproducibility of results obtained for the samples prepared using this system.

Keywords

AMSradiocarbon measurementsgraphitization systemsample preparation
Type
Instrumentation
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 60 , Issue 4: 2nd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference Debrecen, Hungary, July 3–7, 2017 Part 1 of 2 , August 2018 , pp. 1091 - 1100
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Czernik, J, Goslar, T. 2001. Preparation of graphite targets in the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory for AMS 14C dating. Radiocarbon 43(2A):283–291.Google Scholar
Dee, M, Ramsey, CB. 2000. Refinenement of graphite target production at ORAU. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172:449–453.Google Scholar
Dzieduszyńska, DA, Kittel, P, Petera-Zganiacz, J, Brooks, SJ, Korzeń, K, Krapiec, M, Pawłowski, D, Płaza, DK, Płóciennik, M, Stachowicz-Rybka, R, Twardy, J. 2014. Environmental influence on forest development and decline in the Warta River valley (central Poland) during the Late Weichselian. Quaternary International 324:99–114, doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.07.017.Google Scholar
Green, JW. 1963. Wood cellulose. In: Whistler RL, editor. Methods in Carbohydrate Chemistry Volume 3. New York: Acadmic Press. p 9–21.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Donahue, DJ, Hatheway, AL, Linic, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1986. Production of graphite targets by deposition from CO/H2 for precision accelerator 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 28(2A):191–197.Google Scholar
Kiatagawa, H, Masuzawa, T, Nakamura, T, Masumoto, E. 1993. A batch preparation method for graphite targets with low background for AMS 14C measuremets. Radiocarbon 35(1):295–300.Google Scholar
Krajcar-Bronić, I, Horvatinćić, N, Sironić, A, Obelić, B, Bareśić, J, Felja, I. 2010. A new graphite preparation line for AMS 14C dating the Zagreb Radiocarbon Laboratory. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:943–946.Google Scholar
Michczyńska, DJ, Krapiec, M, Michczyński, A, Pawlyta, J, Goslar, T, Nawrocka, N, Piotrowska, N, Szychowska-Krąpiec, E, Waliszewska, B, Zborowska, M. 2018. Different pretreament methods for 14C dating of Younger Dryas and Allerød pine wood (Pinus sylvestris L.). Quaternary Geochronology. In press.Google Scholar
Molnar, M, Janovics, R, Major, I, Orsovszki, J, Gonczi, R, Veres, M, Leonard, AG, Castel, SM, Lange, TE, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Jull, AJT. 2013. Status report of the new AMS 14C sample preparation lab of the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental studies (Debrecen, Hungary). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):665–676.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Schleicher, M, Grootes, PM, Erlenkeuser, H, Gottdang, A, Mous, D J W, Willkomm, H. 1997. The Leibniz-Labor AMS facility at the Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123:22–30.Google Scholar
Nadeau, M-J, Grootes, PM, Schleicher, M, Hasselberg, P, Rieck, A, Bitteling, M. 1998. Sample throughput and data quality at the Leibniz-Labor AMS facility. Radiocarbon 40(1):239–245.Google Scholar
Osborne, EA, McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Hutton, DL, Jones, GA. 1994. Internal and external checks in the NOSAMS sample preparation laboratory for target quality and homogeneity. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92:158–161.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Korput, S, Fogtman, M, Szczepanek, M, Hałas, S, Krąpiec, E, Szychowska-Krąpiec, E. 2005. Carbon-13 in α-cellulose of oak latewood (Jędrzejów, southern Poland) during the Maunder minimum. Geological Quarterly 49(2):165–172.Google Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, HW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200kV. Radiocarbon 49(2):307–314.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ Jr, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalityc reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–306.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, T. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. In: Wölfli W, Polach H, Anderson HH, editors. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Accelerator Mass Spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–293.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE. 1987. Catalyst and binder effects in the use of filamentous graphite for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29(1–2):50–56.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Němec, M, Bourquin, J. 2010. A revolutionary graphitisation system: fully automated, compact and simple. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):931–934.Google Scholar
Xu, XM, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, SH, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a seald tube zink reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–329.Google Scholar