Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:31:35.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A New Automated Extraction System for 14C Measurement for Atmospheric Co2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Jocelyn C Turnbull ,
Scott J Lehman ,
Stephen Morgan  and
Chad Wolak
Jocelyn C Turnbull*
Affiliation:
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, 325 Broadway, Boulder, Colorado 80303, USA University of Colorado at Boulder, 1560 30th St, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Scott J Lehman
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, 1560 30th St, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Stephen Morgan
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, 1560 30th St, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
Chad Wolak
Affiliation:
University of Colorado at Boulder, 1560 30th St, Boulder, Colorado 80309, USA
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The radiocarbon content of atmospheric CO2 (Δ14CO2) has long been of interest to atmospheric and Earth system researchers. Recent improvements in 14C measurement precision and reduction in sample size requirements have now made it possible to measure Δ14CO2 within existing trace gas sampling networks, most notably as a method to quantify recently added fossil-fuel-derived CO2 in the atmosphere. At INSTAAR, in collaboration with NOAA/ESRL, ∼600 atmospheric samples from around the globe are prepared each year, and that number is anticipated to grow in connection with various monitoring and data assimilation efforts. To accommodate the growing demand and reduce per sample costs, we developed an automated extraction system to quantitatively isolate CO2 from whole air for AMS 14C analysis. Twenty samples can be extracted in 1 fully automated run, taking 10–12 hr to complete and requiring only about 1 hr of operator time, a substantial improvement over the manual extraction system. CO2 is extracted cryogenically by flowing the whole air over a liquid nitrogen trap, after first removing water in a trap at –85 °C. Large volume vacuum lines are used to extract ∼30 μmol of CO2 in less than 10 min, keeping contamination from leaks to a minimum and allowing rapid processing and greater throughput. δ13C measurements on the resultant CO2 demonstrate that extraction is quantitative, and extractions of 14C-free air show that no significant modern contamination occurs. Replicate analyses of standard materials indicate that both mean values and precision are comparable to those for the manual extraction system.

Type
Sample Preparation
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 3: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 1261 - 1269
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Graven, HD, Guilderson, TP, Keeling, RF. 2007. Methods for high-precision 14C AMS measurement of atmospheric CO2 at LLNL. Radiocarbon 49(2):349–56.Google Scholar
Graven, HD, Stephens, BB, Guilderson, TP, Campos, TL, Schimel, DS, Campbell, JE, Keeling, RF. 2009. Vertical profiles of biospheric and fossil fuel-derived CO2 and fossil fuel CO2: CO ratios from airborne measurements of 14C, CO2 and CO above Colorado, USA. Tellus B 61(3):536–46.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schmidt, M, Sartorius, H. 2003. A novel approach for independent budgeting of fossil fuel CO2 over Europe by 14CO2 observations. Geophysical Research Letters 30(23):2194.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Hammer, S, Kromer, B, Meinhardt, F. 2007. Radiocarbon observations in atmospheric CO2: determining fossil fuel CO2 over Europe using Jungfraujoch observations as background. Science of the Total Environment 391(2–3):211–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Meijer, HAJ, Smid, HM, Perez, E, Keizer, MG. 1996. Isotopic characterisation of anthropogenic CO2 emissions using isotopic and radiocarbon analysis. Physical Chemistry of the Earth 21(5–6):483–7.Google Scholar
Miller, JB, Mack, KA, Dissly, R, White, JWC, Dlugokencky, EJ, Tans, PP. 2002. Development of analytical methods and measurements of 13C/12C in atmospheric CH4 from the NOAA Climate Monitoring and Diagnostics Laboratory Global Air Sampling Network. Journal of Geophysical Research 107(D13):4178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tans, PP, Conway, TJ. 2005. Monthly atmospheric CO2 mixing ratios from the NOAA CMDL Carbon Cycle Cooperative Global Air Sampling Network, 1968–2002. In: Trends: A Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA.Google Scholar
Trolier, M, White, JWC, Tans, PP, Masarie, KA, Gemery, PA. 1996. Monitoring the isotopic composition of atmospheric CO2: measurements from the NOAA global air sampling network. Journal of Geophysical Research 101(D20):25,897–916.Google Scholar
Turnbull, JC, Miller, JB, Lehman, SJ, Tans, PP, Sparks, RJ, Southon, J. 2006. Comparison of 14CO2, CO and SF6 as tracers for determination of recently added fossil fuel CO2 in the atmosphere and implications for biological CO2 exchange. Geophysical Research Letters 33:L01817, doi:10.1029/2005GL024213.Google Scholar
Turnbull, JC, Lehman, SJ, Miller, JB, Sparks, RJ, Southon, JR, Tans, PP. 2007. A new high precision 14CO2 time series for North American continental air. Journal of Geophysical Research 112:D11310, doi:10.1029/2006JD008184.Google Scholar
Turnbull, JC, Miller, JB, Lehman, SJ, Hurst, DF, Peters, W, Tans, PP, Southon, JR, Montzka, SA, Elkins, JW, Mondeel, DJ, Romashkin, PA, Elansky, NF, Shkorokhod, A. 2009. Spatial distribution of Δ14CO2 across Eurasia: measurements from the TROICA-8 expedition. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9:175–87.Google Scholar