Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T23:09:06.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

National Physical Laboratory Radiocarbon Measurements IV

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

W. J. Callow ,
M. J. Baker  and
Geraldine I. Hassall
W. J. Callow
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England
M. J. Baker
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England
Geraldine I. Hassall
Affiliation:
National Physical Laboratory, Teddington, England
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The following list comprises measurements made since those reported in NPL III and is complete to the end of November 1965.

Ages are relative to A.D. 1950 and are calculated using a half-life of 5568 yr. The measurements, corrected for fractionation (quoted δC13 values are relative to the P.D.B. standard), are referred to 0.950 times the activity of the NBS oxalic acid as contemporary reference standard. The quoted uncertainty is one standard deviation derived from a proper combination of the parameter variances as described in detail in NPL III. These variances are those of the standard and background measurements over a rolling twenty week period, of the sample δC14 and δC13 measurements and of the de Vries effect (assumed to add an additional uncertainty equivalent to a standard deviation of 80 yr). Any uncertainty in the half-life has been excluded so that relative C14 ages may be correctly compared. Absolute age assessments, however, should be made using the accepted best value for the half-life and the appropriate uncertainty then included. If the net sample count rate is less than 4 times the standard error of the difference between the sample and background count rates, a lower limit to the age is reported corresponding to a net sample count rate of 4 times the standard error of this difference.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 8 , 1966 , pp. 340 - 347
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Berger, R., Fergusson, G. J., Libby, W. F., UCLA radiocarbon dates IV: Radiocarbon, v. 7, p. 336–371.Google Scholar
Callow, W. J., Baker, M. J., and Pritchard, D. H., 1964, National Physical laboratory radiocarbon measurements II: Radiocarbon, v. 6, p. 25–30.Google Scholar
Callow, W. J., Baker, M. J., and Hassall, G. I., 1965, National Physical Laboratory radiocarbon measurements III: Radiocarbon, v. 7, p. 156–161.Google Scholar
Charlesworth, J. K., 1929, The South Wales End-Moraine: Q.J.G.S., v. 85, p. 335–358.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., and Godwin, H., 1962, The Neolithic in the Cambridgeshire Fens: Antiquity, v. 36, no. 141, p. 10–23.Google Scholar
Farrand, W. R., and Gadja, R. T., 1962, Isobases on the Wisconsin Marine Limit in Canada: Geol. Bull. 17, Canadian Dept. of Mines and Technical Surveys.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, H., 1943, Coastal peat beds of the British Isles and North Sea: Jour. Ecology, v. 31, no. 2, p. 199–247.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., 1945, Coastal peat beds of the North Sea region as indices of land and sea level changes: New Phytologist, v. 44, p. 29–65.Google Scholar
Godwin, H., Suggate, R. P., and Willis, E. H., 1958 Radiocarbon dating of the eustatic rise in ocean-level: Nature, v. 181, p. 1518–1519.Google Scholar
Green, R. D., and Askew, P. W., 1959, Report Soil Survey Research Board No. 11, p. 22.Google Scholar
Ives, J. D., 1963, Field problems in determining the maximum extent of Pleistocene Glaciation along the Eastern Canadian Seaboard—a geographer's point of view; in North Atlantic Biota and their History, ed. Love, A. and Love, D.: Pergamon Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Jelgersma, S., 1961, Holocene sea level changes in the Netherlands: Meded. Geol. Sticht, serie C. VI, no. 7, p. 9–85.Google Scholar
John, B. S., 1965, A possible Main Würm glaciation in West Pembrokeshire: Nature, v. 207, no. 4997, p. 622–623.Google Scholar
Lewis, W. V., and Balchin, W. G. V., 1940, Past sea levels at Dungeness: Geog. Journal, v. 96, p. 258–285.Google Scholar
Matthews, B., 1962, Glacial and post-glacial geomorphology of the Suglok-Wolstenholme area. Northern Ungava: McGill Sub-Arctic Research Papers, no. 12.Google Scholar
Matthews, B., 1963, Glacial geomorphological investigations in Northern Ungava, Quebec, Canada: Ice, no. 12, p. 9–10.Google Scholar
Matthews, B., 1964, The Late-Pleistocene glaciation and deglaciation of Northernmost Ungava, Quebec: Unpub. reports presented to the Arctic Inst. of North America, Washington Office, p. 94.Google Scholar
Mitchell, G. F., 1960, The Pleistocene History of the Irish Sea: Adv. Sci., v. 17, p. 313–325.Google Scholar
Petrie, W. M. Flinders, 1914, Tarkhan II: British School of Archeol. in Egypt (London), p. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synge, F. M., 1956, Glaciation of North East Scotland: The Scottish Geog. Mag., v. 72, no. 3, p. 129–143.Google Scholar
Synge, F. M., 1961, A correlation between the drift of S. E. Ireland and those of W. Wales: Report No. 2, Welsh Soils discussion group, Aberystwyth.Google Scholar
Synge, F. M., and Stevens, N., 1960, The Quaternary Period in Ireland—an assessment: Irish Geog., v. 4, p. 121–130.Google Scholar
West, R. G., 1963, Problems of the British Quaternary: Proc. Geol. Assoc., v. 74, no. 2, p. 147–186.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1959, The Pleistocene Period: Hutchingson, London, p. 145 Google Scholar