Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-2jptb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-18T02:45:02.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Monks and Icon Painters from the Spaso-Andronikov Monastery, Moscow

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

E I Alexandrovskaya ,
A L Alexandrovskiy ,
J van der Plicht ,
N N Kovalyukh  and
V V Skripkin
E I Alexandrovskaya
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
A L Alexandrovskiy
Affiliation:
Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
J van der Plicht*
Affiliation:
Center for Isotope Research, Groningen University, Groningen, the Netherlands Faculty of Archaeology, Leiden University, Leiden, the Netherlands
N N Kovalyukh
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, Ukraine Academy of Science, Kiev, Ukraine
V V Skripkin
Affiliation:
Institute of Environmental Geochemistry, Ukraine Academy of Science, Kiev, Ukraine
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the Monastery of Our Saviour and St. Andronicus in Moscow, skeletal remains of clerics and of (possibly) famous icon painters were discovered. The bones were radiocarbon dated, and concentrations of trace elements in bone tissues were measured. From tombs 1–4, the 14C dates obtained from human bones (likely monks) and from associated wood date to the 14th–15th centuries AD, as expected. Trace element concentrations indicate signs of fasting. Tomb 5 contained 2 burials; these could belong to the famous icon painters Rublev and Chernyi. Indeed, the bones show high concentrations of lead, zinc, and copper, which is typical for remains of artists and metallurgists. The 14C dates of the 2 skeletons, however, differ by 200 yr, and seem to be too old for Rublev and Chernyi. At this stage, it is not clear if the burials can be assigned to these painters.

Type
How Good Are 14C Ages of Bones? Problems and Methods Applied
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 51 , Issue 2 , 2009 , pp. 627 - 635
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Aerts-Bijma, AT, van der Plicht, J, Meijer, HAJ. 2001. Automatic AMS sample combustion and CO2 collection. Radiocarbon 43(2A):293–8.Google Scholar
Alexandrovskaya, EI, Alexandrovskiy, AL. 2003. Historic-Geographical Anthropochemistry. Moscow: NIA-Priroda. 204 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Alexandrovskaya, EI, Alexandrovskiy, AL. 2005. Radiocarbon data and anthropochemistry of ancient Moscow. Geochronometria 24:87–96.Google Scholar
Art Press. 1948. Fresco and Tempera Painting: The Material and Technology of Russian Mural Painting, 11th–17th Centuries. Art Press, issue 2, Moscow-Leningrad. 448 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Cook, GT, Bonsall, C, Hedges, REM, McSweeney, K, Boroneanţ, V, Pettitt, PB. 2001. A freshwater diet-derived 14C reservoir effect at the Stone Age sites in the Iron Gates Gorge. Radiocarbon 43(2A):453–60.Google Scholar
Emsley, J. 1991. The Elements. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 256 p.Google Scholar
Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2008. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar
Gilbert, R. 1977. Applications of trace elements research to problems in archaeology. In: Blakely, RL, editor. Biocultural Adaptations in Prehistoric America. Athens: University of Georgia Press. p 85–100.Google Scholar
Kozlovskaya, MV. 1996. Ecology of Ancient Tribes in the Forest Zone of Eastern Europe. Moscow: Greko-Latinskii kabinet. 244 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
Longin, R. 1970. Extraction du collagène des os fossiles pour leur datation par la méthode du carbone 14 [PhD dissertation]. University of Lyon.Google Scholar
Mook, WG, Streurman, HJ. 1983. Physical and chemical aspects of radiocarbon dating. In: Proceedings of the First Groningen Symposium on C14 and Archaeology. PACT 8:31–55.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Baillie, MGL, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Bertrand, CJH, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Burr, GS, Cutler, KB, Damon, PE, Edwards, RL, Fairbanks, RG, Friedrich, M, Guilderson, TP, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, Manning, S, Bronk Ramsey, C, Reimer, RW, Remmele, S, Southon, JR, Stuiver, M, Talamo, S, Taylor, FW, van der Plicht, J, Weyhenmeyer, CE. 2004. IntCal04 terrestrial radiocarbon age calibration, 0–26 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1029–58.Google Scholar
Shishlina, NI, van der Plicht, J, Hedges, REM, Zazovskaya, EP, Sevastianov, VS, Chichagova, OA. 2007. The Catacomb culture of the Northwest Caspian steppe: 14C chronology, reservoir effect and paleodiet. Radiocarbon 49(2):713–26.Google Scholar
Skripkin, VV, Kovalyukh, NN. 1998. Recent developments in the procedures used at the SSCER Laboratory for the routine preparation of lithium carbide. Radiocarbon 40(1):211–4.Google Scholar
Stepasheva, I. 1991. The Monastic Kitchen. Moscow: Union of Russian Writers Press. 64 p. In Russian.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J, Wijma, S, Aerts, AT, Pertuisot, MH, Meijer, HAJ. 2000. The Groningen AMS facility: status report. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):58–65.Google Scholar