Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:54:26.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measurement of 14C Content in Leaves near a Cement Factory in Mount Lebanon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 February 2016

Rana Baydoun ,
Omar El Samad ,
Bilal Nsouli  and
Ghassan Younes
Rana Baydoun*
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Omar El Samad
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Bilal Nsouli
Affiliation:
Lebanese Atomic Energy Commission, National Council for Scientific Research, Beirut, Lebanon
Ghassan Younes
Affiliation:
Beirut Arab University, Faculty of Sciences, Chemistry Department, Dibbich, Lebanon
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon content in biogenic samples is widely used to study the variation of atmospheric CO2 due to anthropogenic activities. A total of 26 samples of evergreen and deciduous tree leaves, as well as seasonal small plant leaves, were analyzed for this study. Sampling was carried out at the end of the vegetation season from rural villages surrounding a cement factory in Mount Lebanon Province, Lebanon. Reference samples of identical species were collected during the same period from a clean zone. The conventional 14C method was used for the determination of Δ14C values. The data showed that the 14C concentration in the studied sites was significantly lower than the clean area, due to the release of anthropogenic CO2. In order to estimate the Suess effect, the fossil fuel fraction was determined based on equations of mass balance for CO2 concentration, stable isotopic composition of carbon, and 14C concentration. The results showed that selected locations are affected differently according to their distance from the factory and the wind direction.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 1 , 2015 , pp. 153 - 159
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Battipaglia, G, Marzaioli, F, Lubritto, C, Altieri, S, Strumia, S, Cherubini, P, Cotrufo, MF. 2010. Traffic pollution affects tree-ring width and isotopic composition of Pinus pinea. Science of the Total Environment 408(3):586–93.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baydoun, R, El Samad, O, Aoun, M, Nsouli, B, Younes, G. 2014. Set-up, optimization and first set of samples at the Radiocarbon Laboratory in Lebanon. Geochronometria 41(1):87–91.Google Scholar
Bronić, IK, Horvatinčić, N, Baresić, J, Obelić, B. 2009. Measurement of 14C activity by liquid scintillation counting. Applied Radiation and Isotopes 67(5):800–4.Google Scholar
Bronić, IK, Obelić, B, Horvatinčić, N, Baresić, J, Sironić, A, Minichreiter, K. 2010. Radiocarbon application in environmental science and archaeology in Croatia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 619(1–3):491–6.Google Scholar
Chabarekh, C. 2010. Air quality. In: State and Trends of the Lebanese Environment. 1st edition. Lebanon: United Nations Development Programme. p 101–36.Google Scholar
Hoque, MA, Burgess, WG. 2012. 14C dating of deep groundwater in the Bengal Aquifer System, Bangladesh: implications for aquifer anisotropy, recharge sources and sustainability. Journal of Hydrology 444–445:209–20.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M, Rakowski, AZ. 2013. Atmospheric radiocarbon for the period 1950–2010. Radiocarbon 55(4):2059–72.Google Scholar
Knoll, GF. 2010. Radiation Detection and Measurement. 4th edition. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Kulkova, M, Chadov, F, Davidochkina, A. 2011. Radiocarbon in vegetation of coastal zone of Finnish Bay (Russia). Procedia Environmental Sciences 8:375–81.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Schmidt, M, Sartorius, H. 2003. A novel approach for independent budgeting of fossil fuel CO2 over Europe by 14CO2 observation. Geophysical Research Letters 30(23):2194, doi: 10.1029/2003GL018477 Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B, Hammer, S. 2013. Atmospheric Δ14CO2 trend in Western European background air from 2000 to 2012. Tellus B 65:20092, http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/tellus.v65i0.20092.Google Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Fiumano, V, Capano, M, Passariello, I, De Cesare, N, Terrasi, F. 2011. Forensic applications of 14C at CIRCE. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 269(24):3171–5.Google Scholar
Mazeika, J, Petrosius, R, Pukiene, R. 2008. Carbon-14 in tree rings and other terrestrial samples in the vicinity of Ignalina Nuclear Power Plant, Lithuania. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 99(2):238–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muraki, Y, Masua, K, Arslanov, , Toyoizumi, H, Kato, M, Naruse, Y, Murata, T, Nishiyama, T. 2001. Measurement of radiocarbon content in leaves from some Japanese sites. Radiocarbon 43(2B):695–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakata, K, Kodama, H, Hasegawa, T, Hama, K, Lwatsuki, T, Miyajima, T. 2013. Groundwater dating using radiocarbon in fulvic acid in groundwater containing fuorescein. Journal of Hydrology 489:189–200.Google Scholar
Olsen, J, Heinemeier, J, Hornstrup, KM, Bennike, P, Thrane, H. 2013. ‘Old wood’ effect in radiocarbon dating of prehistoric cremated bones? Journal of Archaeological Science 40(1):30–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, JH, Hong, W, Park, G, Sung, KS, Lee, KH, Kim, YE, Kim, JK, Choi, HW, Kim, GD, Woo, HJ, Nakanishi, T. 2013. A comparison of distribution maps of Δ14C in 2010 and 2011 in Korea. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):841–7.Google Scholar
Pataki, DE, Randerson, JT, Wang, W, Herzenach, MK, Grulke, NE. 2010. The carbon isotope composition of plants and soils as biomarkers of pollution. In: West, JB, Bowen, GJ, Dawson, TE, Tu, KP, editors. Isoscapes: Understanding Movement, Pattern, and Process on Earth through Isotope Mapping. Dordrecht: Springer. p 407–23.Google Scholar
Pawelczyk, S, Pazdur, A. 2004. Carbon isotopic composition of tree rings as a tool for biomonitoring CO2 level. Radiocarbon 46(2):701–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pazdur, A, Nakamura, T, Pawelczyk, S, Pawlyta, J, Piotrowska, N, Rakowski, A, Sensula, B, Szczepanek, M. 2007. Carbon isotopes in tree rings: climate and the Suess effect interferences in the last 400 years. Radiocarbon 49(2):775–88.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Kuc, T, Paweleczyk, S, Piotrowska, N, Sensula, B, Rozanski, K. 2013. Carbon isotope composition of atmospheric carbon dioxide in southern Poland: imprint of anthropogenic CO2 emissions in regional biosphere. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):848–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quarta, G, Rizzo, GA, D'Elia, M, Calcagnile, L. 2007. Spatial and temporal reconstruction of the dispersion of anthropogenic fossil CO2 by 14C AMS measurements of plant material. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):421–5.Google Scholar
Rakowski, AZ, Nakamura, T, Pazdur, A, Meadows, J. 2013. Radiocarbon concentration in annual tree rings from the Salamanca region, western Spain. Radiocarbon 55(2–3):1533–40.Google Scholar
Scott, EM, Cook, GT, Naysmith, P. 2007. Error and uncertainty in radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 49(2):427–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Svetlik, I, Povinec, PP, Molnar, M, Meinhardt, F, Michalek, V, Simon, J, Svingor, E. 2010. Estimation of long-term trends in the tropospheric 14CO2 activity concentration. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):815–22.Google Scholar