Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T15:22:54.091Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Luminescence Dating of the Iron Age Deposits from Tell Damiyah in the Jordan Valley

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 August 2019

Sahar al Khasawneh Open the ORCID record for Sahar al Khasawneh [Opens in a new window] ,
Andrew Murray ,
Zeidan Kafafi  and
Lucas Petit
Sahar al Khasawneh*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University, 21163 Irbid, Jordan
Andrew Murray
Affiliation:
Nordic Laboratory for Luminescence Dating, Department of Geoscience, Aarhus University, Denmark
Zeidan Kafafi
Affiliation:
Faculty of Archaeology and Anthropology, Yarmouk University, 21163 Irbid, Jordan
Lucas Petit
Affiliation:
National Museum of Antiquities, Department Ancient Near East, Leiden, The Netherlands
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected], [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this study, we investigate quartz-based luminescence optical dating of Iron Age deposits at the archaeological site of Tell Damiyah in the Jordan valley. Ten samples, taken from different occupation layers from two different excavation areas, proved to have good luminescence characteristics (fast-component dominated, dose recovery ratio 1.032 ± 0.010, n=24). The optical ages are completely consistent with both available 14C ages and ages based on stylistic elements; it appears that this material was fully reset at deposition, although it is recognised that the agreement with age control is somewhat dependent on the assumed field water content of the samples. Further comparison with different OSL signals from feldspar, or investigations based on dose distributions from individual grains would be desirable to independently confirm the resetting of this material. It is concluded that the sediments of Tell Damiyah are very suitable for luminescence dating. Despite the relatively large associated age uncertainties of between 5 and 10%, OSL at tell sites has the potential to provide ages for material very difficult to date by conventional methods, and to identify reworked mixtures of older artifacts in a younger depositional setting.

Keywords

Iron AgeluminescenceOSLTell Damiyah
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 62 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 1 - 12
Copyright
© 2019 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Aitken, MJ. 1998. An introduction to optical dating. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aitken, MJ. 1985. Thermoluminescence dating. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Al-Muheisen, Z, Abd-Allah, R. 2011. Thermoluminescence dating of pottery objects from Tell Al-Husn, northern Jordan. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 11(1):41–49.Google Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Murray, A, Gebel, H, Bonatz, D. 2016. First application of OSL dating to a chalcolithic well structure in Qulban Bani Murra, Jordan. Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 16(3):127–134.Google Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Murray, A, Bourke, S, Bonatz, D. 2017. Testing feldspar luminescence dating of young archaeological heated materials using potshards from Pella (Tell Tabqat Fahl) in the Jordan valley. Geochronometria 44(1):98–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Murray, A, Abudanah, F. 2019a. A first radiometric chronology for the Khatt Shebib megalithic structure in Jordan using the luminescence dating of rock surfaces. Quaternary Geochronology 49:205–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Murray, A, Khalil, L. 2019b. Luminescence dating of a transitional Chalcolithic/Bronze Age site in Jordan. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences: doi:10.1007/s12520-019-00813-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
al Khasawneh, S, Murray, A, Thomsen, K, AbuAzizeh, W, Tarawneh, M. 2019c. Dating a near eastern desert hunting trap (kite) using rock surface luminescence dating. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 11(5):2109–2119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, L, Roberts, R. 2009. Stochastic modelling of multi-grain equivalent dose (De) distributions: Implications for OSL dating of sediment mixtures. Quaternary Geochronology 4(3):204–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateman, MD, Boulter, CH, Carr, AS, Frederick, CD, Peter, D, Wilder, M. 2007. Detecting post-depositional sediment disturbance in sandy deposits. Quaternary Geochronology 2: 57–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bøtter-Jensen, L, Thomsen, K, Jain, M. 2010. Review of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) instrumental developments for retrospective dosimetry. Radiation Measurements 45(3):253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, A, Wallinga, J. 2010. Selection of integration time intervals for quartz OSL decay curves. Quaternary Geochronology 5(6):657–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duller, G. 2007. Assessing the error on equivalent dose estimates derived from single aliquot regenerative dose measurements. Ancient TL 25:1–5.Google Scholar
Feathers, JK, Holliday, VT, Meltzer, DJ. 2006. Optically stimulated luminescence dating of Southern High Plains archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 33(12): 1651–1665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freiesleben, T, Sohbati, R, Murray, A, Jain, M, al Khasawneh, S, Hvidt, S, Jakobsen, B. 2015. Mathematical model quantifies multiple daylight exposure and burial events for rock surfaces using luminescence dating. Radiation Measurements 81:16–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guérin, G, Mercier, N, Adamiec, G. 2011. Dose-rate conversion factors: update. Ancient TL 29(1):5–8.Google Scholar
Hansen, V, Murray, A, Buylaert, JP, Yeo, EY, Thomsen, K. 2015. A new irradiated quartz for beta source calibration. Radiation Measurements 81:123–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, V, Murray, A, Thomsen, K, Jain, M, Autzen, M, Buylaert, JP. 2018. Towards the origins of over-dispersion in beta source calibration. Radiation Measurements 120:157–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jain, M, Murray, A, Bøtter-Jensen, L. 2003. Characterisation of blue-light stimulated luminescence components in different quartz samples: implications for dose measurement. Radiation Measurements 37(4):441–449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kafafi, Z, Petit, L. 2018. Recycling the Valley: Preliminary Report: Tall Damiyah Excavations 2014. ADAJ 59:317–329.Google Scholar
Liritzis, I, Singhvi, AK, Feathers, JK, Wagner, GA, Kadereit, A, Zacharias, N, Li, SH. 2013. Luminescence dating in archaeology, anthropology, and geoarchaeology: an overview. Heidelberg: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mauz, B, Bode, T, Mainz, E, Blanchard, H, Hilger, W, Dikau, R, Zöller, L. 2002. The luminescence dating laboratory at the University of Bonn: equipment and procedures. Ancient TL 20 (2):53–61.Google Scholar
Mejdahl, V. 1987. Internal radioactivity in quartz and feldspar grains. Ancient TL 5:10–17.Google Scholar
Murray, A, Wintle, A. 2000. Luminescence dating of quartz using an improved single-aliquot regenerative-dose protocol. Radiation Measurements 32(1):57–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A, Olley, J. 2002. Precision and accuracy in the optically stimulated luminescence dating of sedimentary quartz: a status review. Geochronometria 21(1):1–16.Google Scholar
Murray, A, Marten, R, Johnston, A, Martin, P. 1987. Analysis for naturally occurring radionuclides at environmental concentrations by gamma spectrometry. Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry 115(2):263–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A, Helsted, LM, Autzen, M, Jain, M, Buylaert, JP. 2018. Measurement of natural radioactivity: Calibration and performance of a high-resolution gamma spectrometry facility. Radiation Measurements 120:215–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A, Buylaert, JP, Thiel, C. 2015. A luminescence dating intercomparison based on a Danish beach-ridge sand. Radiation Measurements 81:32–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, A, Wintle, A. 2003. The single aliquot regenerative dose protocol: potential for improvements in reliability. Radiation Measurements 37:377–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, L, Kafafi, Z. 2018. Recycling the Valley: preliminary report: Tall Damiyah Excavations 2015. ADAJ 59:329–337.Google Scholar
Petit, L, Kafafi, Z. 2016. Beyond the River Jordan. A Late Iron Age sanctuary at Tell Damiyah. Near Eastern Archaeology 79(1):18–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petit, L. 2009. Settlement dynamics in the Middle Jordan Valley during the Iron Age II. British Archaeological Reports. International Series 2033. Oxford: Archaeopress.Google Scholar
Porat, N, Jain, M, Ronen, A, Horwitz, LK. 2017. A contribution to late middle Paleolithic chronology of the Levant: new luminescence ages for the Atlit railway bridge site, coastal plain, Israel. Quaternary International 464:32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porat, N, Duller, G, Roberts, M, Piasetzky, E, Finkelstein, I. 2012. OSL dating in multi-strata Tel: Megiddo (Israel) as a case study. Quaternary Geochronology 10:359–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prescott, J, Hutton, J. 1994. Cosmic ray contributions to dose rates for luminescence and ESR dating: large depths and long-term variations. Radiation Measurements 23:497–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodius, C, Kadereit, A, Siegel, U, Schmidt, K, Eichmann, R, Khalil, LA. 2017. Constraining the time of construction of the irrigation system of Tell Hujayrat al-Ghuzlan near Aqaba, Jordan, using high resolution. Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences 9:345–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singarayer, J, Baile, R. 2003. Further investigations of the quartz optically stimulated luminescence components using linear modulation. Radiation Measurements 37:451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohbati, R, Murray, AS, Porat, N, Jain, M, Avner, U. 2015. Age of a prehistoric “Rodedian” cult site constrained by sediment and rock surface luminescence dating techniques. Quaternary Geochronology 30:90–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sohbati, R, Murray, A, Porat, N, Jain, M, Avner, U. 2012. Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) as a chronometer for surface exposure dating. Journal of Geophysical Research 117(B9):B09202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, KJ, Murray, AS, Buylaert, JP, Jain, M, Hansen, JH, Aubry, T. 2016. Testing single-grain quartz OSL methods using sediment samples with independent age control from the Bordes-Fitte rockshelter (Roches d’Abilly site, Central France). Quaternary Geochronology 31:77–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Kooij, G. 2001. The Vicissitudes of Life at Dayr ‘Alla during the First Millenium BC, Seen in a Wider Context. Studies in the History and Archaeology of Jordan VII:295–303.Google Scholar
Vandenberghe, D, De Corte, F, Buylaert, JP, Kučera, J. 2008. On the internal radioactivity in quartz. Radiation Measurements 43:771–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, D. 1971. Thermoluminescence dating using fine grains from pottery. Archaeometry 13:29–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar