Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T01:52:29.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Improvements in Procedural Blanks at NOSAMS: Reflections of Improvements in Sample Preparation and Accelerator Operation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

A.P. McNichol
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
A. R. Gagnon
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
E. A. Osborne
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
D. L. Hutton
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
K.F. Von Reden
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
R. J. Schneider
Affiliation:
National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer Facility, Department of Marine Geology and Geophysics, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, Massachusetts 02543 USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

During the four years the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL) at the National Ocean Sciences Accelerator Mass Spectrometer (NOSAMS) Facilty has been in operation we have accumulated much data from which we can assess our progress. We evaluate our procedural blanks here and describe modifications in our procedures that have improved our analyses of older samples. In the SPL, we convert three distinct types of samples—seawater, CaCO3 and organic carbon—to CO2 prior to preparing graphite for the accelerator and have distinct procedural blanks for each procedure. Dissolved inorganic carbon (∑CO2) is extracted from acidified seawater samples by sparging with a nitrogen carrier gas. We routinely analyze “line blanks” by processing CO2 from a 14C-dead source through the entire stripping procedure. Our hydrolysis blank, IAEA C-1, is prepared by acidifying in vacuo with 100% H3PO4 at 60° overnight, identical to our sample preparation. We use a dead graphite, NBS-21, or a commercially available carbon powder for our organic combustion blank; organic samples are combusted at 850° for 5 h using CuO to provide the oxidant. Analysis of our water stripping data suggests that one step in the procedure contributes the major portion of the line blank. At present, the contribution from the line blank has no effect on our seawater analyses (fraction modern (fm) between 0.7 and 1.2). Our hydrolysis blanks can have an fm value as low as 0.0006, but are more routinely between 0.0020 and 0.0025. The fm of our best organic combustion blanks is higher than those routinely achieved in other laboratories and we are currently altering our methods to reduce it.

Type
V. Advances in Measurement Techniques
Copyright
Copyright © the Department of Geosciences, The University of Arizona 

References

Donahue, D. J., Linick, T. W. and Jull, A. J. T. 1990 Isotope-ratio and background corrections for accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon measurements. Radiocarbon 32(2): 135142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagnon, A. R. and Jones, G. A. 1993 AMS-graphite target production methods at the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution during 1986–1991. Radiocarbon 35(2): 301310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, A. P., Gagnon, A. R. Jones, G. A. and Osborne, E. A. 1992 Illumination of a black box: Analysis of gas composition during graphite target preparation. In Long, A. and Kra, R.S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 34(3): 321329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, A. P., Jones, G. A., Hutton, D. L. and Gagnon, A. R. 1994 The rapid preparation of seawater ∑CO2 for radiocarbon analysis at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility. Radiocarbon 36(2): 237246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, R. J., Jones, G. A., McNichol, A. P., von Reden, K. F., Elder, K. L., Huang, K. and Kessel, E. D. 1994 Methods for data screening, flagging and error analysis at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B92: 172175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, J. S., Nelson, D. E. and Southon, J. R. 1987 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29(3): 323333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar