Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T16:27:21.940Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Oysters to Cockles at Hjarnø Sund: Environmental and Subsistence Changes at a Danish Mesolithic Site

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 July 2018

Johan S Larsen ,
Bente Philippsen ,
Claus Skriver ,
Peter M Astrup ,
Per Borup  and
Marcello A Mannino
Johan S Larsen
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Moesgaard Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark Centre for Urban Network Evolutions (UrbNet), Aarhus University, Moesgaard Allé 20, 4230, second floor, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark
Bente Philippsen
Affiliation:
Aarhus AMS Centre, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade 120, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
Claus Skriver
Affiliation:
Moesgaard Museum, Moesgaard Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark
Peter M Astrup
Affiliation:
Moesgaard Museum, Moesgaard Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark
Per Borup
Affiliation:
Horsens Museum, Sundvej 1A, 8700 Horsens, Denmark
Marcello A Mannino*
Affiliation:
Department of Archaeology and Heritage Studies, Aarhus University, Moesgaard Allé 20, 8270 Højbjerg, Denmark Department of Human Evolution, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Archaeological fieldwork at Hjarnø Sund in Horsens Fjord (eastern Jutland, Denmark) has explored an eroding Mesolithic shell midden. Its stratigraphy is characterized by two layers, containing marine mollusk taxa typically collected by Mesolithic hunter-gatherers for food. In the field, the lower layer appeared to be dominated by oysters (Ostrea edulis), while the upper one by cockles (Cerastoderma edule), which was confirmed by our zooarchaeological study. Accelerator mass spectrometry radiocarbon (AMS 14C) dating on shells and paired charcoal samples from the two layers indicate that these are chronologically consecutive (separated by as little as 0–163 yr [95.4%]) and that the oyster-to-cockle shift dated between ~5500–5300 and ~5300–5200 cal BC (around or just after the Kongemose/Ertebølle transition). The shell midden at Hjarnø Sund is, thus, one of the oldest-known in Denmark, demonstrating that intensive shellfish exploitation was a hallmark of the Ertebølle culture from its inception. Oyster-to-cockle shifts, thus, also occurred at times other than the Mesolithic–Neolithic Transition and may have been ultimately caused by local shoreline displacements, resulting from changes in sedimentation, possibly induced by drops in relative sea level.

Keywords

Cerastoderma eduleErtebølleMesolithicOstrea edulisshell midden
Type
Environmental Context
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 60 , Special Issue 5: 2nd Radiocarbon in the Environment Conference, Debrecen, Hungary, July 3–7, 2017 Part 2 of 2 and Radiocarbon & Diet 2 International Conference Aarhus, Denmark, June 20–23, 2017 , October 2018 , pp. 1507 - 1519
Copyright
© 2018 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Andersen, SH, Malmros, C. 1966. Norslund. En kystboplads fra ældre stenalder. Kuml 1965:35–114.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 1991. Norsminde. A “Køkkenmødding” with Late Mesolithic and Early Neolithic occupation. Journal of Danish Archaeology 8:13–40.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 1993. Bjørnsholm. A stratified Køkkenmødding on the Central Limfjord, North Jutland. Journal of Danish Archaeology 10:59–96.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 1995. Coastal adaption and marine exploitation in Late Mesolithic Denmark – with special emphasis on the Limfjord region. In: Fischer A, editor. Man and Sea in the Mesolithic. Coastal Settlement above and below Present Sea Level. Oxbow Monograph. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 41–66.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 2000. Køkkenmøddinger (Shell Middens) in Denmark: a survey. Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society 66:361384.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 2001. Køkkenmøddingerne – Ældre stenalders kystbopladser. In: Jørgensen AN, Pind J, editors. Før Landskabets Erindring Slukkes. Status og fremtid for dansk arkæologi . Copenhagen: Det Arkæologiske Nævn, Kulturministeriet. p 25–40.Google Scholar
Andersen, S. 2007. Shell middens (“Køkkenmøddinger”) in Danish Prehistory as a reflection of the marine environment. In: Milner N, Craig OE, Bailey GN, editors. Shell Middens in Atlantic Europe. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 31–45.Google Scholar
Andersen, SH. 2008. The Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in Western Denmark seen from a kitchen midden perspective. A survey. Analecta Praehistorica Leidensia 40:67–74.Google Scholar
Bailey, G. 1993. Shell mounds in 1972 and 1992: reflections on recent controversies at Ballina and Weipa. Australian Archaeology 37:2–18.Google Scholar
Berglund, BE, Sandgren, P, Barnekow, L, Hannon, G, Jiang, H, Skog, G, Yu, SY. 2005. Early Holocene history of the Baltic Sea, as reflected in coastal sediments in Blekinge, southeastern Sweden. Quaternary International 130:111–139.Google Scholar
Borup, P. 2003. Havet i Horsens Fjord i forhistorisk tid. Horsens–Ren Fjord, Nyhedsbrev 11:271–277.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2009. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 51:337–360.Google Scholar
Christensen, C. 1995. The littorina transgressions in Denmark. In: Fischer A, editor. Man and Sea in the Mesolithic. Coastal Settlement above and below Present Sea Level. Oxbow Monograph 53. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p. 15–22.Google Scholar
Christensen, C, Fischer, A, Mathiassen, DR. 1997. The great sea rise in the Storebælt. In: Fischer A, Pedersen L, editors. The Danish Storebælt since the Ice Age – Man, Sea and Forest. Copenhagen: A/S Storebæltsforbindelsen. p 45–54.Google Scholar
Christensen, C, Nielsen, AB. 2008. Dating Littorina shore levels in Denmark on the basis of data from a Mesolithic coastal settlement on Skagens Odde, Northern Jutland. Polish Geological Institute Special Papers 23:27–38.Google Scholar
Lewis, JP, Ryves, DB, Rasmussen, P, Olsen, J, Knudsen, K–L, Andersen, SH, Weckström, K, Clarke, AL, Andrén, E, Juggins, S. 2016. The shellfish enigma across the Mesolithic–Neolithic transition in southern Scandinavia. Quaternary Science Reviews 151:315–320.Google Scholar
Lykke-Andersen, H. 1979. Nogle undergrundstektoniske elementer i det danske Kvartær. Dansk Geologisk Forening Årsskrift for 1978. p 1–6.Google Scholar
Meehan, B. 1982. Shell Bed to Shell Midden. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.Google Scholar
Mertz, EL. 1924. Oversigt over de sen– og postglaciale niveauforandringer i Danmark. Danmarks Geologiske Undersøgelse II Rk., 41.Google Scholar
Milano, S, Schöne, B, Witbaard, R. 2017. Changes of shell microstructural characteristics of Cerastoderma edule (Bivalvia). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 465:395–406.Google Scholar
Milner, N. 2002. Oysters, cockles and kitchenmiddens: changing practices at the Mesolithic/Neolithic Transition. In: Miracle P, Milner N, editors. Consuming Passions and Patterns of Consumption. McDonald Institute Monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research. p 89–96.Google Scholar
Milner, N. 2005. Seasonal consumption practices in the Mesolithic. Economic, environmental, social or ritual?. In: Milner N, Woodman P, editors. Mesolithic Studies at the Beginning of the 21st Century. Oxford: Oxbow Books. p 56–68.Google Scholar
Milner, N. 2013. Human impacts on oyster resources at the Mesolithic–Neolithic Transition in Denmark. In: Thompson VD, Waggoner JC, editors. The Archaeology and Historical Ecology of Small Scale Economics. Gainesville (FL): University Press of Florida. p 17–40.Google Scholar
Nielsen, N. 2008. Marine molluscs in Danish Stone Age middens: A case study on Krabbesholm II. In: Antczak A, Cipriani R, editors. Early Human Impact on Megamolluscs. British Archaeological Reports, International Series 1865. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 157–67.Google Scholar
Olsen, J, Rasmussen, P, Heinemeier, J. 2009. Holocene temporal and spatial variation in the radiocarbon reservoir age of three Danish fjords. Boreas 38:458–470.Google Scholar
Price, TD. 2015. Ancient Scandinavia. An Archaeological History from the First Humans to the Vikings. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Bayliss, A, Beck, JW, Blackwell, PG, Bronk Ramsey, C, Grootes, PM, Guilderson, TP, Haflidason, H, Hajdas, I, Hatté, C, Heaton, TJ, Hoffmann, DL, Hogg, AG, Hughen, KA, Kaiser, KF, Kromer, B, Manning, SW, Niu, M, Reimer, RW, Richards, DA, Scott, EM, Southon, JR, Staff, RA, Turney, CSM, van der Plicht, J. 2013. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 55(4):1869–1887.Google Scholar
Rowley-Conwy, P. 1984. The laziness of the short–distance hunter: the origins of agriculture in western Denmark. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 3:300–324.Google Scholar
Skriver, C. 2015. FHM5184. Hjarnø Sund. Marint Stednr. 401284–38. Beretning for undersøgelse 2015. Moesgård Museum, Marinarkæologiske undersøgelser, nr. 18.Google Scholar
Skriver, C, Borup, P, Astrup, PM. 2017. Hjarnø Sund: An Eroding Mesolithic Site and the Tale of two Paddles. In: Bailey GN, Harff J, Sakellariou D, editors. Under the Sea: Archaeology and Palaeolandscapes. Coastal Research Library. Springer. p. 131–143.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–363.Google Scholar
Sørensen, SA. 2017. The Kongemose Culture. The Royal Society of Northern Antiquaries. Odense: University Press of Southern Denmark.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5:289–293.Google Scholar
Waselkov, GA. 1987. Shellfish gathering and shell midden archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 10:93–210.Google Scholar