Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T02:58:05.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Flame-Sealed Tube Graphitization Using Zinc as the Sole Reduction Agent: Precision Improvement of EnvironMICADAS 14C Measurements on Graphite Targets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 February 2016

Gergely Orsovszki  and
László Rinyu
Gergely Orsovszki
Affiliation:
Isotoptech Zrt, H-4025 Debrecen, Hungary
László Rinyu*
Affiliation:
Isotoptech Zrt, H-4025 Debrecen, Hungary Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies, Institute for Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (ATOMKI), H-4026 Debrecen, Hungary
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The flame-sealed tube zinc reduction graphitization method has been successfully adapted and optimized for radiocarbon measurements on EnvironMICADAS in the Institute for Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (ATOMKI HLES). To reduce the cost and treatment time of producing graphite targets from samples of about 1 mg carbon content, we have omitted the titanium hydride (TiH2) reagent and used a decreased amount of zinc as the sole reductant in our new method. These changes have also helped to eliminate methane formation during the graphitization processes as well as to recover higher ion current at the same background level. These conditions have led to improved efficiency in the 14C measurements; furthermore, the instrument background level remained sufficiently low (<49,000 yr BP). After determining the optimum parameters of the new Zn graphitization method (2.5 mg Fe powder, 15.0 mg Zn powder, 10 hr graphitization at 550°C in heating block, reaction cells with reagent pretreated at 300°C for 1 hr), verification of the accuracy was carried out by the preparation and measurement of IAEA standard samples (C2, C6, C7, C8) with known 14C activity. The sensitivity of the method for gas contamination was tested and determined by comparing the results to measurements of reserved portions of previously processed real samples.

Type
Articles
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 57 , Issue 5 , 2015 , pp. 979 - 990
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chung, IM, Kim, SH. 2013. Biological and biomedical 14C-accelerator mass spectrometry and graphitization of carbonaceous samples. Analyst 138(12):3347–55.Google Scholar
Dee, M, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2000. Refinement of graphite target production at ORAU. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):449–53.Google Scholar
D'Elia, M, Calcagnile, L, Quarta, G, Sanapo, C, Laudisa, M, Toma, U, Rizzo, A. 2004. Sample preparation and blank values at the AMS radiocarbon facility of University of Lecce. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:278–83.Google Scholar
Dhindaw, BK, Sircar, SC. 1968. Kinetics and mechanisms of sulfation reactions during roasting of sulfides. Proceedings of Nonferrous Metals Technology Symposium. Volume 3. Jamshedpur, India. p 58.Google Scholar
Ertunç, T, Xu, S, Bryant, CL, Maden, C, Murray, C, Currie, M, Freeman, SPHT. 2005. Progress in AMS target production of sub-milligram samples at the NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory. Radiocarbon 47(3):453–64.Google Scholar
Jull, AJT, Donahue, DJ, Hatheway, AL, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1986. Production of graphite targets by deposition from CO/H2 for precision accelerator 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 28(2A):191–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khosh, MS, Xu, X, Trumbore, SE. 2010. Small-mass graphite preparation by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):927–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, SH, Kelly, PB, Clifford, AJ. 2008. Biological/biomedical accelerator mass spectrometry targets. 1. Optimizing the CO2 reduction step using zinc dust. Analytical Chemistry 80(20):7651–60.Google Scholar
Le Clercq, M, van der Plicht, J, Gröning, M. 1998. New 14C reference materials with activities of 15 and 50 pMC. Radiocarbon 40(1):295–7.Google Scholar
Marzaioli, F, Borriello, G, Passariello, I, Lubritto, C, De Cesare, N, D'Onofrio, A, Terrasi, F. 2008. Zinc reduction as an alternative method for AMS radiocarbon dating: process optimization at CIRCE. Radiocarbon 50(1):139–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Jones, GA, Osborne, EA. 1992. Illumination of a black box: analysis of gas composition during graphite target preparation. Radiocarbon 34(3):321–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molnár, M, Rinyu, L, Nagy, T, Svingor, É, Futó, I, Veres, M, Jull, AJT. 2010. Developments and results from the new Hungarian graphite target line. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8): 940–2.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Janovics, R, Major, I, Orsovszki, J, Gönczi, R, Veres, M, Leonard, AG, Castle, SM, Lange, TE, Wacker, L, Hajdas, I, Jull, AJT. 2013a. Status report of the new AMS 14C sample preparation lab of the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (Debrecen, Hungary). Radiocarbon 55(2–3):665–76.Google Scholar
Molnár, M, Rinyu, L, Veres, M, Seiler, M, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A. 2013b. EnvironMICADAS: a mini 14C AMS with enhanced gas ion source interface in the Hertelendi Laboratory of Environmental Studies (HEKAL), Hungary. Radiocarbon 55(2):338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, EA, McNichol, AP, Gagnon, AR, Hutton, D, Jones, GA. 1994. Internal and external checks in the NOSAMS sample preparation laboratory for target quality and homogeneity. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92(1–4):158–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palcsu, L, Vető, I, Futó, I, Vodila, G, Papp, L, Major, Z. 2014. In-reservoir mixing of mantle-derived CO2 and metasedimentary CH4-N2 fluids – noble gas and stable isotope study of two multistacked fields (Pannonian Basin System, W-Hungary). Marine and Petroleum Geology 54:216–27.Google Scholar
Rinyu, L, Futó, I, Kiss, ÁZ, Molnár, M, Svingor, É, Quarta, G, Calcagnile, L. 2007. Performance test of a new graphite target production facility in ATOMKI. Radiocarbon 49(2):217–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rinyu, L, Molnár, M, Major, I, Nagy, T, Veres, M, Kimák, Á, Wacker, L, Synal, H-A. 2013. Optimization of sealed tube graphitization method for environmental 14C studies using MICADAS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 294:270–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, K. 1991. Consultants' group meeting on 14C reference materials for radiocarbon laboratories. Internal Report, IAEA, Vienna, Austria. February 18–20, 1991.Google Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Buekens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1990. The IAEA 14C Intercomparison exercise. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–19.Google Scholar
Slota, PJ, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Döbeli, M, Jacob, S, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2004. Radiocarbon AMS towards its lower-energy limits. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:339–45.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2007. MICADAS: a new compact radiocarbon AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):7–13.Google Scholar
Verkouteren, RM, Klouda, GA. 1992. Factorial design techniques applied to optimization of AMS graphite target preparation. Radiocarbon 34(3):335–43.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS. 1992. Rapid production of graphite without contamination for biomedical AMS. Radiocarbon 34(3):344–50.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Southon, JR, Nelson, DE, Brown, TA. 1984. Performance of catalytically condensed carbon for use in accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):289–93.Google Scholar
Vogel, JS, Nelson, DE, Southon, JR. 1987. 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29(3):323–33.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Bonani, G, Friedrich, M, Hajdas, I, Kromer, B, Nemec, M, Ruff, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Vockenhuber, C. 2010a. MICADAS: routine and high-precision radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 52(2):252–62.Google Scholar
Wacker, L, Christl, M, Synal, H-A. 2010b. Bats: a new tool for AMS data reduction. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):976–9.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):320–9.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Khosh, MS, Druffel-Rodriguez, KC, Trumbore, SE, Southon, JR. 2010. Is the consensus value of ANU sucrose (IAEA C-6) too high? Radiocarbon 52(2–3):866–74.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Gao, P, Salamanca, EG. 2013. Ultra small-mass graphitization by sealed tube zinc reduction method for AMS 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 55(2):608–16.Google Scholar