Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-kw2vx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-23T15:28:50.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating sulfur-impurity removal and modern carbon contamination in different preparation methods for radiocarbon dating of soil samples by accelerator mass spectrometry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2025

Jun Koarashi Open the ORCID record for Jun Koarashi [Opens in a new window] ,
Erina Takeuchi ,
Yoko Saito-Kokubu  and
Mariko Atarashi-Andoh
Jun Koarashi*
Affiliation:
Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
Erina Takeuchi
Affiliation:
Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
Yoko Saito-Kokubu
Affiliation:
Tono Geoscience Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Gifu 509-5102, Japan
Mariko Atarashi-Andoh
Affiliation:
Nuclear Science and Engineering Center, Japan Atomic Energy Agency, Ibaraki 319-1195, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Jun Koarashi; Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Radiocarbon (14C) dating of soil samples by accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) has been proven useful for studying carbon (C) cycling in terrestrial ecosystems. However, this application has two primary difficulties in sample preparation: inhibition of graphite formation due to sulfur (S)-containing impurities and contamination of samples with modern C (MC). Herein, we evaluated these effects using three sample preparation methods (silver foil, silver wire, and Sulfix) by conducting AMS-14C measurements of a 14C-dead charred wood and S-rich soil samples. The preparation methods were all successful in graphite formation and AMS-14C measurement for soil samples with an organic S content <6.9 wt%. The methods showed different percent modern carbon (pMC) values from 0.16% to 0.64% for the 14C-dead sample. The results also revealed that across different methods, MC contamination can be significantly reduced by applying two-step procedure (combustion and subsequent reaction to remove S-containing impurities) during sample preparation. The three methods had a negligible influence on determining the 14C age for samples that were at least younger than 12,000 yr BP. As the 14C ages of the soil samples are typically younger than 12,000 yr BP, any method explored in this study can be employed for 14C dating with sufficient accuracy for application to C cycle studies.

Keywords

modern carbon contaminationpreparation for accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS)radiocarbon (14C) datingsoil samplesSulfix reagentsulfur-impurity removal
Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , First View , pp. 1 - 11
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Balesdent, J, Basile-Doelsch, I, Chadoeuf, J, Cornu, S, Derrien, D, Fekiacova, Z and Hatté, C (2018) Atmosphere–soil carbon transfer as a function of soil depth. Nature 559, 599–602.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, L, Caffy, I, Delqué-Količ, E, Moreau, C, Dumoulin, J-P, Perron, M, Guichard, H and Jeammet, V (2018) Absolute dating of lead carbonates in ancient cosmetics by radiocarbon. Communications Chemistry 1, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutton, TW, Wong, WW, Hachey, DL, Lee, LS, Cabrera, MP and Klein, PD (1983) Comparison of quartz and Pyrex tubes for combustion of organic samples for stable carbon isotope analysis. Anal. Chem. 55, 1832–1833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, TW, Todd-Brown, KEO, Rowe, CW, Wieder, WR, Carey, JC, Machmuller, MB et al. (2016) Quantifying global soil carbon losses in response to warming. Nature 540, 104–108.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hua, Q, Jacobsen, GE, Zoppi, U, Lawson, EM, Williams, AA, Smith, AM and McGann, MJ (2001) Progress in radiocarbon target preparation at the ANTARES AMS Centre. Radiocarbon 43, 275–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, Q, Zoppi, U, Williams, AA and Smith, AM (2004) Small-mass AMS radiocarbon analysis at ANTARES. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 223–224, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) (2014) Reference Sheet for IAEA-C1 to IAEA-C9 Quality Control Materials. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna.Google Scholar
IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Masson-Delmotte, V, Zhai, P, Pirani, A, Connors, SL, Pean, C, Berger, S, Caud, N, Chen, Y, Goldfarb, L, Gomis, MI, Huang, M, Leitzell, K, Lonnoy, E, Matthews, JBR, Maycock, TK, Waterfield, T, Yelekci, O, Yu, R and Zhou, B (eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.Google Scholar
Kitagawa, H, Masuzawa, T, Nakamura, T and Matsumoto, E (1993) A batch preparation method for graphite targets with low background for AMS 14C measurements. Radiocarbon 35, 295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koarashi, J, Atarashi-Andoh, M, Ishizuka, S, Miura, S, Saito, T and Hirai, K (2009) Quantitative aspects of heterogeneity in soil organic matter dynamics in a cool-temperate Japanese beech forest: A radiocarbon-based approach. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 631–642.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koarashi, J, Hockaday, WC, Masiello, CA and Trumbore, SE (2012) Dynamics of decadally cycling carbon in subsurface soils. J. Geophys. Res. 117, G03033.Google Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y, Bogomolova, I and Glaser, B (2014) Biochar stability in soil: Decomposition during eight years and transformation as assessed by compound-specific 14C analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 70, 229–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, Z, Wang, G, Wang, E (2019) Global subsoil organic carbon turnover times dominantly controlled by soil properties rather than climate. Nat. Commun. 10, 3688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minami, M, Miyata, Y and Nakamura, T (2011) 14C sample preparation with stepwise heating. In Summaries of Researches Using AMS at Nagoya University (XXII), Center for Chronological Research, Nagoya University, 225–228.Google Scholar
Mueller, K and Muzikar, P (2002) Quantitative study of contamination effects in AMS 14C sample processing. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 197, 128–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakajima, Y, Wada, H, Matsuzaki, H and Suzuki, Y (2004) Preparation method and its application for determination of 14C of the elemental carbon in the atmosphere. J. Mass Spectrom. Soc. Jpn. 52, 339–346 (in Japanese with English abstract).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nakanishi, T, Atarashi-Andoh, M, Koarashi, J, Saito-Kokubu, Y and Hirai, K (2012) Carbon isotopes of water-extractable organic carbon in a depth profile of forest soil imply a dynamic relationship with soil carbon. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 63, 495–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olsen, J, Daróczi, T-T and Kanstrup, M (2023) Comparing methods for CO2 purification of cremated bone samples. Radiocarbon 65, 809–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rethemeyer, J, Fülöp, R-H, Höfle, S, Wacker, L, Heinze, S, Hajdas, I, Patt, U, König, S, Stapper, B and Dewald, A (2013) Status report on sample preparation facilities for 14C analysis at the new CologneAMS center. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 294, 168–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B and van der Plicht, J (1992) The IAEA 14C Intercomparison Exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34, 506–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito-Kokubu, Y, Fujita, N, Miyake, M, Watanabe, T, Ishizaka, C, Okabe, N, Ishimaru, T, Matsubara, A, Nishizawa, A, Nishio, T, Kato, M, Torazawa, H and Isozaki, N (2019) Current status of JAEA-AMS-TONO in the 20th year. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 456, 271–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saito-Kokubu, Y, Fujita, N, Watanabe, T, Matsubara, A, Ishizaka, C, Miyake, M, Nishio, T, Kato, M, Ogawa, Y, Ishii, M, Kimura, K, Shimada, A and Ogata, N (2023) Status report of JAEA-AMS-TONO: Research and technical development in the last four years. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 539, 68–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schleicher, M, Grootes, PM, Nadeau, M-J and Schoon, A (1998) The carbonate 14C background and its components at the Leibniz AMS facility. Radiocarbon 40, 85–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnug, E, Haneklaus, SH and Bloem, E (2017) Sulfur. In Lal, R (ed), Encyclopedia of Soil Science, Third Edition. CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, 2241–2246.Google Scholar
Schuur, EAG, Carbone, MS, Hicks Pries, CE, Hopkins, FM and Natali, SM (2016) Radiocarbon in terrestrial systems. In Schuur, EAG, Druffel, ERM and Trumbore, SE (eds), Radiocarbon and Climate Change. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, 167–220.Google Scholar
Shi, Z, Allison, SD, He, Y, Levine, PA, Hoyt, AM, Beem-Miller, J, Zhu, Q, Wieder, WR, Trumbore, S and Randerson, JT (2020) The age distribution of global soil carbon inferred from radiocarbon measurements. Nat. Geosci. 13, 555–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M and Polach, HA (1977) Reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19, 355–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, S, Meyer, VD, Dolman, AM, Winterfeld, M, Hefter, J, Dummann, W, McIntyre, C, Montluçon, DB, Haghipour, N, Wacker, L, Gentz, T, van der Voort, TS, Eglinton, TI and Mollenhauer, G (2020) 14C blank assessment in small-scale compound-specific radiocarbon analysis of lipid biomarkers and lignin phenols. Radiocarbon 62, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomsen, M and Gulliksen, S (1992) Reduction of CO2-to-graphite conversion time of organic materials for 14C AMS. Radiocarbon 34, 330–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbore, S (2009) Radiocarbon and soil carbon dynamics. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 37, 47–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vandeputte, K, Moens, L, Dams, R and van der Plicht, J (1998) Study of the 14C-contaminaton potential of C-impurities in CuO and Fe. Radiocarbon 40, 103–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Nelson, DE and Southon, JR (1987) 14C background levels in an accelerator mass spectrometry system. Radiocarbon 29, 323–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wijesinghe, JN, Koarashi, J, Atarashi-Andoh, M, Saito-Kokubu, Y, Yamaguchi, N, Sase, T, Hosono, M, Inoue, Y, Mori, Y and Hiradate, S (2020) Formation and mobility of soil organic carbon in a buried humic horizon of a volcanic ash soil. Geoderma 374, 114417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S, Ito, S, Iwatsuki, T, Abe, M and Watanabe, M (2000) A new AMS facility at the JNC Tono Geoscience Center, Japan. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 172, 8–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zazzo, A, Lebon, M, Chiotti, L, Comby, C, Delqué-Količ, E, Nespoulet, R and Reiche, I (2013) Can we use calcined bones for 14C dating the Paleolithic? Radiocarbon 55, 1409–1421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Koarashi et al. supplementary material

Koarashi et al. supplementary material
Download Koarashi et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.3 KB