Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:19:32.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Duration of Tell Settlements at Four Prehistoric Sites in Hungary

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Ede Hertelendi
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
Eava Svingor
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
Pál Raczky
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Loránd Eötvös University, POB 107, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary
Ferenc Horváth
Affiliation:
Ferenc Móra Museum, Roosevelt tér 1-3, H-6701 Szeged, Hungary
István Futó
Affiliation:
Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, POB 51, H-4001 Debrecen, Hungary
László Bartosiewicz
Affiliation:
Institute of Archaeological Sciences, Loránd Eötvös University, POB 107, H-1364 Budapest, Hungary
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The chief objective of this paper is to improve our understanding of the Neolithic in eastern Hungary using absolute chronological data. To accomplish this we calibrated new measurements as well as previously published dates. The up-to-date, standardized evaluation of 147 calibrated measurements showed temporal overlaps between archaeological cultures defined on the basis of ceramic styles. The average timespan of tell settlements of 285 yr was obtained using radiocarbon dates from four major settlements in eastern Hungary: Berettyóújfalu-Herpály, Hódmezővásáhely-Gorzsa-Cukortanya, Öcsöd-Kováshalom and Polgár-Csőszhalom.

Type
Part 2: Applications
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Aitchison, T. C., Ottaway, B. S. and Al-Ruzaiza, A. S. 1991 Summarizing a group of 14C dates on the historical time scale: With a worked example from the Late Neolithic of Bavaria. Antiquity 65: 108116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bognár-Kutzián, I. 1985 Contribution to the prehistoric chronology of Hungary. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Institutes der Ungrarischen. Akademie der Wissenschaften 14: 293298.Google Scholar
Bognár-Kutzián, I. and Csongor, É. 1987 New results of radiocarbon dating of archaeological finds in Hungary. In Pécsi, M. and Csongor, É., eds., The Holocene Environment in Hungary. Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó: 131140.Google Scholar
Gläser, R. 1996 Zur absoluten Datierung der Vinča-Kultur anhand von 14C Daten. In Drasovean, F., ed., The Vinča culture, its role and cultural connections. International Symposium, Timisoara. Bibliotheca Historica et Archaeologica Banatica II: 175–12.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E. and Horváth, F., 1992 Radiocarbon chronology of late Neolithic settlements in the Tisza-Maros region, Hungary. In Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Proceedings of the 14th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 34(3): 859866.Google Scholar
Hertelendi, E., Kalicz, N., Raczky, P., Horváth, F., Veres, M., Svingor, É., Futó, I. and Bartosiewicz, L. 1995 Re-evaluation of the Neolithic in eastern Hungary based on calibrated radiocarbon dates. In Cook, G. T., Harkness, D. D., Miller, B. F. and Scott, E. M., eds., Proceedings of the 15th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 37(2): 239245.Google Scholar
Horváth, F. 1991 Vinča culture and its connections with the southeast Hungarian Neolithic: A comparison of traditional and 14C chronology. Banatica 11: 259273.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. 1985 On the chronological problems of the Neolithic and Copper Age in Hungary. Mitteilungen des Archäologischen Institutes der Ungarischen Akademie der Wissenschaften 14: 2151.Google Scholar
Kalicz, N. and Raczky, P. 1987 The Late Neolithic of the Tisza region. A survey of recent archaeological research. In Raczky, P., ed., The Late Neolithic of the Tisza region. Budapest, Szolnok: 1130.Google Scholar
Makkay, J. 1982 A magyarországi neolitikum kutatásának új eredményei. Az időrend és a népi azonosítás kérdései (New results in the research of the Hungarian Neolithic. Questions of chronology and ethnic identification). Budapest, Akadémiai Kiadó.Google Scholar
Petrasch, J. 1991 Zur absoluten Chronologie des südostund mitteleuropäischen Neolithikums. Banatica 11: 6571.Google Scholar
Raczky, P. 1995 New data on the absolute chronology of the Copper Age in the Carpathian Basin. In Kovács, T., ed., Neuere Daten zur Siedlungsgeschichte und Chronologie der Kupferzeit des Karpatenbeckens. IPH : 5159.Google Scholar
Ruoff, M. and Gross, E. 1991 Die Bedeutung der absoluten Datierung der jungsteinzeitlichen Kulturen in der Schweiz für die Urgeschichte Europas. In Lichardus, J., ed., Die Kupferzeit als historische Epoche. Symposium Saarbrücken und Otzenhausen : 401420.Google Scholar
Schier, W. 1996 The relative and absolute chronology of Vinča: New evidence from the type site. In Drasovean, F., ed., The Vinča culture, its role and cultural connections. International Symposium. Timisoara, Bibliotheca Historica et Archaeologica Banatica II: 141162.Google Scholar
Schlichterle, H. 1989 Pfahlbauten: Die frühe Besiedlung des Alpenvorlandes. Spektrum der Wissenschaft Juni : 7285.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Pearson, G. W. 1993 High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, ad 1950–500 bc and 2500–6000 bc. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1987 User's guide to the program Calib and Display Rev 2.1: Quaternary Isotope Laboratory, University Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Reimer, P. J. 1993 Extended 14C data base and revised CALIB 3.0 14C age calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 215231.Google Scholar
van der Plicht, J. and Mook, W. G. 1989 Calibration of 14C data by computer. In Long, A., Kra, R. S. and Srdoč, D., eds., Proceedings of the 13th International 14C Conference. Radiocarbon 31(3): 805816.Google Scholar