Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T01:45:06.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Differentiating Bone Osteonal Turnover Rates By Density Fractionation; Validation Using the Bomb 14C Atmospheric Pulse

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Ji Young Shin
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford, UK, OX1 3QJ Email: [email protected]
Tamsin O'Connell
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford, UK, OX1 3QJ
Stuart Black
Affiliation:
School of Human and Environmental Sciences, University of Reading, Whiteknights, Reading, PO Box 227, RG6 6AB
Robert Hedges*
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory for Archaeology, University of Oxford, 6 Keble Road, Oxford, UK, OX1 3QJ
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The density (BSG) of bone increases, at the osteon scale, during lifetime aging within the bone. In addition, post-mortem diagenetic change due to microbial attack produces denser bioapatite. Thus, fractionation of finely powdered bone on the basis of density should not only enable younger and older populations of osteons to be separated but also make it possible to separate out a less diagenetically altered component. We show that the density fractionation method can be used as a tool to investigate the isotopic history within an individual's lifetime, both in recent and archaeological contexts, and we use the bomb 14C atmospheric pulse for validating the method.

Type
Part II
Copyright
Copyright © The Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bell, LS, Cox, G, Sealy, J. 2001. Determining isotopic life history trajectories using bone density fractionation and stable isotope measurements: a new approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 116:6679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fincham, AG. 1969. The density fractionation of hard tissues; the application of the “Coulter Counter” to the density-volume distribution of dried bone powders. Calcified Tissue Research 3:327–39.Google Scholar
Frost, HM. 1969. Tetracycline-based histological analysis of bone remodelling. Calcified Tissue Research 3: 211–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geyh, MA. 2001. Bomb radiocarbon dating of animal tissue and hair. Radiocarbon 43(2B):723–30.Google Scholar
Goodsite, ME, Rom, W, Heinemeier, J, Lange, T, Ooi, S, Appleby, PG, Shotyk, W, van der Knaap, WO, Lohse, C, Hansen, TS. 2001. High-Resolution AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants. Radiocarbon 43(2B):495515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedges, REM, Law, IA, Bronk, CR, Housley, RA. 1989. The Oxford accelerator mass spectrometry facility: technical developments in routine dating. Archaeometry 31(2):99113.Google Scholar
Hedges, REM, Millard, AR, Pike, AWG. 1995. Measurements and relationships of diagenetic alteration of bone from three archaeological sites. Journal of Archaeological Science 22:201–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, I, Hesshaimer, V. 2000. Radiocarbon—a unique tracer of global carbon cycle dynamics. Radiocarbon 42:6980.Google Scholar
Lowenstam, HA, Weiner, S. 1989. On Biomineralization. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p 162–7.Google Scholar
Marshall, JH, Liniecki, J, Lloyd, EL, Marotti, G, Mays, CW, Rundo, J, Sissons, HA, Snyder, WS. 1973. Alkaline earth metabolism in adult man. Health Physics 24: 125221.Google Scholar
Newman, WF, Neuman, MW. 1958. The Chemical Dynamics of Bone Mineral. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p 101–17.Google Scholar
Stenhouse, MJ, Baxter, MS. 1979. The uptake of bomb 14C in humans. In: Berger, R, Suess, HE, editors. Radiocarbon Dating. Berkeley: University of California Press. p 324–41.Google Scholar
van Klinken, GJ, Hedges, REM. 1998. Chemistry strategies for organic 14C samples. Radiocarbon 40(1):51–6.Google Scholar