Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:44:32.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Developing Ultra Small-Scale Radiocarbon Sample Measurement at the University of Tokyo

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Yusuke Yokoyama ,
Mamito Koizumi ,
Hiroyuki Matsuzaki ,
Yosuke Miyairi  and
Naohiko Ohkouchi
Yusuke Yokoyama*
Affiliation:
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Chiba 277-8564, Japan Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
Mamito Koizumi
Affiliation:
Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Chiba 277-8564, Japan Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo, Bunkyoku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan
Hiroyuki Matsuzaki
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Yosuke Miyairi
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering and Management, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
Naohiko Ohkouchi
Affiliation:
Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, 2-15 Natsushima-cho, Yokosuka 237-0061, Japan
*
Corresponding author: Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We have developed accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) measurement techniques for ultra small-size samples ranging from 0.01 to 0.10 mg C with a new type of MC-SNICS ion source system. We can generate 4 times higher ion beam current intensity for ultra-small samples by optimization of graphite position in the target holder with the new ionizer geometry. CO2 gas graphitized in the newly developed vacuum line is pressed to a depth of 1.5 mm from the front of the target holder. This is much deeper than the previous position at 0.35 mm depth. We measured 12C4+ beam currents generated by small standards and ion beam currents (15–30 μA) from the targets in optimized position, lasting 20 min for 0.01 mg C and 65 min for 0.10 mg C. We observed that the measured 14C/12C ratios are unaffected by the difference of ion beam currents ranging from 5 to 30 μA, enabling measurement of ultra-small samples with high precision. Examination of the background samples revealed 1.1 μg of modern and 1 μg of dead carbon contaminations during target graphite preparation. We make corrections for the contamination from both the modern and background components. Reduction of the contamination is necessary for conducting more accurate measurement.

Type
Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 310 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Graven, HD, Guilderson, TP, Keeling, RF. 2007. Methods for high-precision 14C AMS measurement of atmospheric CO2 at LLNL. Radiocarbon 49(2):349–56.Google Scholar
Kjeldsen, H, Churchman, J, Leach, P, Bronk Ramsey, C. 2008. On the prospects of AMS 14C with real-time sample preparation and separation. Radiocarbon 50(2):267–74.Google Scholar
Lifton, NA, Jull, AJT, Quade, J. 2001. A new extraction technique and production rate estimate for in situ cosmogenic 14C in quartz. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65(12):1953–69.Google Scholar
Matsuzaki, H, Nakano, C, Tsuchiya, Y, Kato, K, Maejima, Y, Miyairi, Y, Wakasa, S, Aze, T. 2007. Multi-nuclide AMS performances at MALT. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):36–40.Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1983. A versatile high intensity negative ion source. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 214(2–3):129–50.Google Scholar
Middleton, R. 1989. A Negative-Ion Cookbook. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Physics. 194 p.Google Scholar
Naysmith, P, Cook, GT, Phillips, WM, Lifton, NA, Anderson, R. 2004. Preliminary results for the extraction and measurement of cosmogenic in situ 14C from quartz. Radiocarbon 46(1):201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohkouchi, N, Eglinton, TI, Hayes, JM. 2003. Radiocarbon dating of individual fatty acid as a tool for refining Antarctic Margin sediment chronologies. Radiocarbon 45(1):17–24.Google Scholar
Ruff, M, Wacker, L, Gäggeler, H, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Szidat, S. 2007. A gas ion source for radiocarbon measurements at 200 kV. Radiocarbon 49(2):307–14.Google Scholar
Santos, GM, Southon, JR, Griffin, S, Beaupre, SR, Druffel, ERM. 2007. Ultra small-mass AMS 14C sample preparation and analyses at KCCAMS/UCI Facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):293–302.Google Scholar
Shah, S, Pearson, A. 2007. Ultra-microscale (5–25 μg C) analysis of individual lipids by 14C AMS: assessment and correction for sample processing blanks. Radiocarbon 49(1):69–82.Google Scholar
Smith, AM, Petrenko, VV, Hua, Q, Southon, J, Brailsford, G. 2007. The effect of N2O, catalyst and means of water vapor removal on the graphitization of small CO2 samples. Radiocarbon 49(2):245–54.Google Scholar
Southon, JR, Santos, GM. 2007. Life with MC-SNICS. Part II: further ion source development at the Keck carbon cycle AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):88–93.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. 1983. International agreements and the use of the new oxalic acid standard. Radiocarbon 25(2):793–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
von Reden, K, McNichol, AP, Pearson, A, Schneider, RJ. 1998. 14C AMS measurements of <100 μg samples with a high-current system. Radiocarbon 40(1):247–53.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Caffee, MW, Southon, JR, Nishiizumi, K. 2004. Measurements of in-situ produced 14C in terrestrial rocks. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:253–8.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Miyairi, Y, Matsuzaki, H, Tsunomori, F. 2007. Relation between acid dissolution time in the vacuum test tube and time required for graphitization for AMS target preparation. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):330–4.Google Scholar
Yokoyama, Y, Matsuzaki, H, Esat, TM. 2008. Prospects for the new frontiers of Earth and environmental sciences. Quaternary Geochronology 3(3):206–7.Google Scholar