Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:44:52.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A Chronology of the Pre-Columbian Paracas and Nasca Cultures in South Peru Based on AMS 14C Dating

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Ingmar Unkel*
Affiliation:
Heidelberg Academy of Sciences, c/o Institut für Umweltphysik, INF 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Bernd Kromer
Affiliation:
Heidelberg Academy of Sciences, c/o Institut für Umweltphysik, INF 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
Markus Reindel
Affiliation:
German Archaeological Institute, Commission for the Archaeology of Extra-European Cultures, Endenicher Strasse 41, 53115 Bonn, Germany
Lukas Wacker
Affiliation:
Institute of Particle Physics, HPK H25, ETH-Hoenggerberg, 8093 Zurich, Switzerland
Günther Wagner
Affiliation:
Heidelberg Academy of Sciences, c/o Institut für Umweltphysik, INF 229, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The people of the Paracas and Nasca cultures, the creators of the famous geoglyphs, lived in the desert of the southern coast of Peru between about 800 BC and AD 650. The archaeological chronology of these cultures has been based almost exclusively on a sequence of ceramic styles. The absolute dating of some of the style phases was supported by a few radiocarbon dates (Rowe 1967). Here, we present an absolute chronology of the Paracas and Nasca cultures based on 14C dating of more than 100 organic samples from settlement and tomb relics, as well as on material derived from geoglyph sites in the Nasca/Palpa region (south Peru). The main focus has been on Nasca period settlement centers near Palpa, Los Molinos and La Muña, the Paracas period site of Jauranga, and the Initial period site of Pernil Alto. Most of the 14C samples were dated at the accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) facility of the ETH Zurich (Switzerland). The targets were produced in the newly built graphitization line at the Heidelberg 14C laboratory (Germany). Clay (adobe) bricks, which are quite a common building material in Peru, were successfully tested to be used for AMS 14C dating of adobe architecture in Peruvian archaeology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2007 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Bayes, TR. 1763. An essay towards solving a problem in the doctrine of chances. Philosophical Transactions (1683–1775) 53:370418.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 1995. Radiocarbon and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 37(2): 425–30.Google Scholar
Bronk Ramsey, C. 2001. Development of the radiocarbon calibration program. Radiocarbon 43(2A):355–63.Google Scholar
Buck, CE, Millard, AR, editors. 2004. Tools for Constructing Chronologies: Crossing Disciplinary Boundaries. London: Springer-Verlag. 257 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burger, RL. 1981. The radiocarbon evidence for the temporal priority of Chavin de Huantar. American Antiquity 46(3):592602.Google Scholar
DeLeonardis, L. 1997. Paracas settlement in Callango, lower Ica Valley, 1st millenium B.C., Peru [PhD dissertation]. Washington D.C.: Catholic University of America.Google Scholar
Disselhoff, HD. 1969. Früh-Nazca im äußersten Süden Peru, Provincia de Camaná (Dep. Arequipa). In: Verhandlungen des 38. Internationalen Amerikanisten Kongresses Stuttgart-München 1968. p 385–91. In German.Google Scholar
Eggert, MKH. 2001. Prähistorische Archäologie: Konzepte und Methoden. Tübingen, Basel: Francke. 412 p. In German.Google Scholar
Gayton, AH, Kroeber, AL. 1927. The Uhle pottery collections from Nazca. University of California Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 24(1):146.Google Scholar
Görsdorf, J, Reindel, M. 2002. Radiocarbon dating of the Nasca settlements Los Molinos and La Muña in Palpa, Peru. Geochronometria 21:151–6.Google Scholar
Hecht, N. 2007. Eine befundorientierte relative Chronologic der Nasca-Keramik in Palpa [PhD dissertation]. Bonn: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms Universität. In German.Google Scholar
Joyce, TA. 1912. South American Archaeology. New York: GP. Putnam's Sons. 292 p.Google Scholar
Lambers, K. 2004. The geoglyphs of Palpa (Peru): documentation, analysis, and interpretation [PhD dissertation]. Zurich: University of Zurich. Abstract available online at http://www.dissertationen.unizh.ch/2005/lambers/abstract.html.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Reimer, PJ, Hogg, AG, Higham, TFG, Baillie, MGL, Palmer, J, Stuiver, M. 2002. Calibration of the radiocarbon time scale for the Southern Hemisphere: AD 1850–950. Radiocarbon 44(3):641–51.Google Scholar
McCormac, FG, Hogg, AG, Blackwell, PG, Buck, CE, Higham, TFG, Reimer, PJ. 2004. SHCal04 Southern Hemisphere calibration, 0–11.0 cal kyr BP. Radiocarbon 46(3):1087–92.Google Scholar
Menzel, D. 1971. Estudios arqueológicos en los Valles de Ica, Pisco, Chincha y Cañete. Arqueología y Sociedad 6:1158. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Menzel, D, Rowe, JH, Dawson, LE. 1964. The Paracas Pottery of Ica: A Study in Style and Time. Berkeley: University of California Press. 399 p.Google Scholar
Michczyński, A, Eeckhout, P, Pazdur, A. 2003. 14C absolute chronology of Pyramid III and the dynastic model at Pachacamac, Peru. Radiocarbon 45(1):5973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, A, editor. 1991. Paracas Art and Architecture: Object and Context in South Coastal Peru. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. 455 p.Google Scholar
Reindel, M, Isla Cuadrado, J, Koschmieder, K. 1999. Vorspanische Siedlungen und Bodenzeichnungen in Palpa, Südperu. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archäologie (BAVA) 19:313–81. In German and Spanish.Google Scholar
Reindel, M, Isla Cuadrado, J. 2001. Los Molinos und La Muña. Zwei Siedlungszentren der Nasca-Kultur in Palpa, Südperu. Beiträge zur Allgemeinen und Vergleichenden Archäologie (BAVA) 21:241319. In German and Spanish.Google Scholar
Reindel, M, Isla Cuadrado, J, Lambers, K. 2003. Die Arbeiten des Archäologischen Projektes Nasca-Palpa, Peru, im Jahr 2002. In: Jahresbericht der Schweizerisch-Liechtensteinischen Stiftung für Archäologische Forschungen im Ausland (2002). Zurich and Vaduz. p 119–32. In German.Google Scholar
Rowe, JH. 1959. Archaeological dating and cultural process. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 15(4): 317–24.Google Scholar
Rowe, JH. 1960. Nuevos datos relativos a la cronología del Estilo Nasca. In: Matos, RM, editor. Antiguo Perú: Espacio y Tiempo. Lima: Juan Mejia Baca. p 2945. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Rowe, JH. 1967. An interpretation of radiocarbon measurements on archaeological samples from Peru. In: Rowe, JH, Menzel, D, editors. Peruvian Archaeology: Selected Readings. Palo Alto, California, USA: Peek Publications. p 1630.Google Scholar
Silverman, H. 1991. The Paracas problem: archaeological perspectives. In: Paul, A, editor. Paracas Arts and Architecture. Object and Context in South Coastal Peru. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press. p 349414.Google Scholar
Silverman, H, Proulx, DA. 2002. The Nasca. Kolata, A, Snow, D, series editors. Peoples of America series. Oxford: Blackwell. 360 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Reimer, PJ, Bard, E, Beck, JW, Burr, GS, Hughen, KA, Kromer, B, McCormac, G, van der Plicht, J, Spurk, M. 1998. IntCal98 radiocarbon age calibration, 24,000–0 cal BP. Radiocarbon 40(3):1041–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tello, JC. 1917. Los antiguos cementerios del valle de Nazca. In: Swiggett D, editor. Proceedings of the Second Pan American Scientific Congress, Washington, USA. Volume 1. Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office. p 283–91. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Uhle, M. 1914. The Nasca pottery of ancient Peru. Proceedings of the Davenport Academy of Sciences 13:117. Davenport, Iowa, USA.Google Scholar
Unkel, I. 2006. AMS-14C-Analysen zur Rekonstruktion der Landschafts- und Kulturgeschichte in der Region Palpa (S-Peru) [PhD dissertation]. Heidelberg: Universität Heidelberg. Available online at http://www.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/archiv/6311. 156 p. In German.Google Scholar
Velarde, L. 1997. La transición Paracas-Nasca en el valle de Chincha. In: Chevalier, A, Velarde, L, Chenal-Velarde, I, editors. L'Amerique du Sud: Des chasseurs-cueilleurs à l'Empire Inca. Actes des journées d'étude d'archéologie précolombienne. British Archaeological Reports (BAR) International Series 746. Geneva, Switzerland, 10–11 October 1997. Oxford: Archaeopress. p 6377. In Spanish.Google Scholar
Wetter, A. 2005. Paracas-Keramik aus Jauranga: Grundlagen zur Klassifikation formativzeitlicher Keramik der Südküste Perus [Master's thesis]. Bonn: Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn. In German.Google Scholar
Ziolkowski, M, Pazdur, M, Krzanowski, A, Michczyński, A. 1994. ANDES: Radiocarbon Database for Bolivia, Ecuador and Peru. Warsaw and Gliwice: Warsaw University & Silesian Technical University.Google Scholar