Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T10:24:56.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Changes of 14C Concentration in Modern Trees from Upper Silesia Region, Poland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Andrzej Z Rakowski*
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, ul. Krzywoustego 2,44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Sławomira Pawełczyk
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, ul. Krzywoustego 2,44-100 Gliwice, Poland
Anna Pazdur
Affiliation:
Silesian University of Technology, Institute of Physics, Radiocarbon Laboratory, ul. Krzywoustego 2,44-100 Gliwice, Poland
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Radiocarbon concentration measurements in tree rings from Upper Silesia indicate significantly lower 14C concentration as compared to the concentrations occurring in “clean air” areas. This phenomenon is known as the Suess effect and is caused by contamination with inactive carbon that originates from fossil fuels combustion. This effect is observed in large urban and industrial areas. Samples for the measurements presented in the paper were collected in some of the largest cities in Upper Silesia: Gliwice, Ruda Śląska, and Chorzów. The samples were annual tree rings (Populus nigra, Pinus silvestris) covering years 1965–1992 and the atmospheric CO2 collected weekly between December 1994 and December 1995.

Type
I. Our ‘Dry’ Environment: Above Sea Level
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Awsiuk, R, Pazdur, MF. 1986. Regional Suess effect in Upper Silesia urban area. Radiocarbon 28(2A):655–60.Google Scholar
Florkowski, T, Kuc, T. 1979. Carbon isotopes and sulphur content as indicators of atmospheric pollution from burning fossil fuels. Environment International 2: 431–5.Google Scholar
Kuc, T, Zimnoch, M. 1998. Changes of the CO2 sources and sinks in polluted urban area (Southern Poland) over last decades, derived from the carbon isotope composition. Radiocarbon 40(1):417–23.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Suchard, J, Kromer, B, Munnich, KO. 1989. The continental European Suess effect. Radiocarbon 31(3):431–40.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Graul, R, Trivett, NBA. 1995. Long-term observation of atmospheric CO2 and carbon isotopes at continental sites in Germany. Tellus 47B:2334.Google Scholar
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 1997. Twenty years of high-precision atmospheric 14CO2 observations at Schauinsland station, Germany. Radiocarbon 39(2):205–18.Google Scholar
Nydal, R, Lövseth, K. 1983. Tracing bomb 14C in the atmosphere, 1963–1980. Journal of Geophysical Research 88:3621–42.Google Scholar
Oeschger, H, Siegenthaler, U, Gugelmann, A. 1975. A box diffusion model to study the carbon dioxide exchange in nature. Tellus 27:168–92.Google Scholar
Pawlyta, J, Rakowski, AZ, Pazdur, A, Miller, BF, Harknes, DD, 1998. Commissioning of a Quantulus 1220 liquid scintillation beta spectrometer for the measurement of C-14 and H-3 at natural abundance level. Radiocarbon 40(1):201–8.Google Scholar
Pazdur, A, Pazdur, M F. 1986. Aparatura pomiarowa Labratorium 14C w Gliwicach. Doswiadczenia konstrukcyjne i eksploatacyjne (The measuring equipment of the Gliwice Radiocarbon Laboratory. Experience gathered in the construction and exploitation). Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Slaskiej, Seria Matematyka-Fizyka. Zeszyt 46-Geochronometria 1:5569.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, U, Oeschger, H. 1987. Biospheric CO2 emission during the past 200 years reconstructed by decon-volution of ice core data. Tellus 39:140–54.Google Scholar
Suess, HE. 1955. Radiocarbon concentration in modern wood. Science 122:415–17.Google Scholar
Usdowski, E., Hoefs, J. 1986. 13C/12C partitioning and kinetics of CO2 absorption by hydroxide buffer solutions. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 80:130–4.Google Scholar