Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:24:59.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Carbon Dioxide Capture Using a Zeolite Molecular Sieve Sampling System for Isotopic Studies (13C and 14C) of Respiration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

S M L Hardie*
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, United Kingdom Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, United Kingdom
M H Garnett
Affiliation:
NERC Radiocarbon Laboratory, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, United Kingdom
A E Fallick
Affiliation:
Scottish Universities Environmental Research Centre, Rankine Avenue, Scottish Enterprise Technology Park, East Kilbride, G75 0QF, United Kingdom
A P Rowland
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, United Kingdom
N J Ostle
Affiliation:
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, United Kingdom
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected].
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A method for collecting an isotopically representative sample of CO2 from an air stream using a zeolite molecular sieve is described. A robust sampling system was designed and developed for use in the field that includes reusable molecular sieve cartridges, a lightweight pump, and a portable infrared gas analyzer (IRGA). The system was tested using international isotopic standards (13C and 14C). Results showed that CO2 could be trapped and recovered for both δ13C and 14C analysis by isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS), respectively, without any contamination, fractionation, or memory effect. The system was primarily designed for use in carbon isotope studies of ecosystem respiration, with potential for use in other applications that require CO2 collection from air.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2005 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Balesdent, J, Mariotti, A. 1996. Measurement of soil organic matter turnover using 13C natural abundance. In: Boutton, TW, Yamasaki, S-I, editors. Mass Spectrometry of Soils. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. p 83112.Google Scholar
Barrer, RM. 1959. New selective sorbents: porous crystals as molecular filters. British Chemical Engineering May Issue: 267–79.Google Scholar
Barrer, RM. 1978. Zeolites and Clay Minerals as Sorbents and Molecular Sieves. New York: Academic Press. 497 p.Google Scholar
Bauer, JE, Williams, PM, Druffel, ERM. 1992. Recovery of submilligram quantities of carbon dioxide from gas streams by molecular sieve for subsequent determination of isotopic (13C and 14C) natural abundances. Analytical Chemistry 64(7):824–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BDH. No date. ‘Union Carbide’ molecular sieves for selective adsorption. BDH Chemicals Ltd. Google Scholar
Bol, RA, Harkness, DD. 1995. The use of zeolite molecular sieves for trapping low concentrations of CO2 from environmental atmospheres. Radiocarbon 37(2):643–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boutton, TW. 1996. Stable carbon isotope ratios of soil organic matter and their use as indicators of vegetation and climate change. In: Boutton, TW, Yamasaki, S-I, editors. Mass Spectrometry of Soils. New York: Marcel Dekker Inc. p 4782.Google Scholar
Breck, DW. 1974. Zeolite Molecular Sieves: Structure, Chemistry and Use. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 771 p.Google Scholar
Carbolite. No date. Range of tube furnaces. Carbolite, UK.Google Scholar
Charman, DJ, Aravena, R, Bryant, CL, Harkness, DD. 1999. Carbon isotopes in peat, DOC, CO2, and CH4 in a Holocene peatland on Dartmoor, southwest England. Geology 27(6):539–42.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, PM, Betts, RA, Jones, CD, Spall, SA, Totterdell, IJ. 2000. Acceleration of global warming due to carbon-cycle feedbacks in a coupled climate model. Nature 408(6809):184–7.Google Scholar
Cui, Y, Kita, H, Okamoto, K. 2003. Preparation and gas separation properties of zeolite T membrane. Chemical Communications 17:2154–5.Google Scholar
Dörr, H, Münnich, KO. 1986. Annual variations of the 14C content of soil CO2 . Radiocarbon 28(2A):338–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyer, A. 1988. An Introduction to Zeolite Molecular Sieves. Chichester: J. Wiley & Sons. 149 p.Google Scholar
Flanigen, EM. 1991. Zeolites and molecular sieves. An historical perspective. In: van Bekkum, H, Flanigen, EM, Jansen, JC, editors. Introduction to Zeolite Science and Practice. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. p 1334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freeman, S, Xu, S, Schnabel, C, Dougans, A, Tait, A, Kitchen, R, Klody, G, Loger, R, Pollock, T, Schroeder, J, Sundquist, M. 2004. Initial measurements with the SUERC accelerator mass spectrometer. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 223–24:195–8.Google Scholar
Gaudinski, JB, Trumbore, SE, Davidson, EA, Zheng, S. 2000. Soil carbon cycling in a temperate forest: radiocarbon-based estimates of residence times, sequestration rates and partitioning of fluxes. Biogeochemistry 51(1):3369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gulliksen, S, Scott, M. 1995. Report of the TIRI workshop, Saturday 13 August 1994. Radiocarbon 37(2):820–1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harkness, DD, Harrison, AF, Bacon, PJ. 1986. The temporal distribution of “bomb” 14C in a forest soil. Radiocarbon 28(2A):328–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harrison, KG. 1996. Using bulk soil radiocarbon measurements to estimate soil organic matter turnover times: implications for atmospheric CO2 levels. Radiocarbon 38(2):181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change). 2001. Houghton, JT, Ding, Y, Griggs, DJ, Noguer, M, van der Linden, PJ, Dai, X, Maskell, K, Johnson, CA, editors. Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 892 p.Google Scholar
Keeling, CD. 1958. The concentration and isotopic abundances of atmospheric carbon dioxide in rural areas. Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 13(4):322–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knorr, W, Prentice, IC, House, JI, Holland, EA. 2005. Long-term sensitivity of soil carbon turnover to warming. Nature 433(7023):298301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koarashi, J, Amano, H, Andoh, M, Iida, T, Moriizumi, J. 2002. Estimation of 14CO2 flux at soil-atmosphere interface and distribution of 14C in forest ecosystem. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 60(3):249–61.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levin, I, Kromer, B. 2004. The tropospheric 14CO2 level in mid-latitudes of the Northern Hemisphere (1959–2003). Radiocarbon 46(3):1261–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindroth, A, Grelle, A, Morén, A-S. 1998. Long-term measurements of boreal forest carbon balance reveal large temperature sensitivity. Global Change Biology 4(4):443–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, J, Taylor, JA. 1994. On the temperature dependence of soil respiration. Functional Ecology 8(3):315–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mack, MC, Schuur, EAG, Bret-Harte, MS, Shaver, GR, Chapin, FS IE. 2004. Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization. Nature 431(7007):440–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paul, EA, Follett, RF, Leavitt, SW, Halvorson, A, Peterson, GA, Lyon, DJ. 1997. Radiocarbon dating for determination of soil organic matter pool sizes and dynamics. Soil Science Society of America Journal 61(4):1058–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quideau, SA, Chadwick, OA, Trumbore, SE, Johnson-Maynard, JL, Graham, RC, Anderson, MA. 2001. Vegetation control on soil organic matter dynamics. Organic Geochemistry 32(2):247–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, JW, Tufekcioglu, A. 2000. Vegetation and soil respiration: correlations and controls. Bio geochemistry 48(1):7190.Google Scholar
Richter, DD, Markewitz, D, Trumbore, SE, Wells, CG. 1999. Rapid accumulation and turnover of soil carbon in a re-establishing forest. Nature 400(6739):56–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rozanski, K, Stichler, W, Gonfiantini, R, Scott, EM, Beukens, RP, Kromer, B, van der Plicht, J. 1992. The IAEA 14C Intercomparison Exercise 1990. Radiocarbon 34(3):506–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruthven, D. 1984. Principles of Adsorption and Adsorption Processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 464 p.Google Scholar
Sanderman, J, Amundson, RG, Baldocchi, DD. 2003. Application of eddy covariance measurements to the temperature dependence of soil organic matter mean residence time. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 17(2):1061.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimel, DS. 1995. Terrestrial ecosystems and the carbon cycle. Global Change Biology 1(1):7791.Google Scholar
Siriwardane, RV, Shen, M-S, Fisher, EP, Poston, JA. 2001. Adsorption of CO2 on molecular sieves and activated carbon. Energy and Fuels 15(2):279–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slota, PJ, Jull, AJT, Linick, TW, Toolin, LJ. 1987. Preparation of small samples for 14C accelerator targets by catalytic reduction of CO. Radiocarbon 29(2):303–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.Google Scholar
Trumbore, S. 2000. Age of soil organic matter and soil respiration: radiocarbon constraints on belowground C dynamics. Ecological Applications 10(2):399411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trumbore, SE, Chadwick, OA, Amundson, R. 1996. Rapid exchange between soil carbon and atmospheric carbon dioxide driven by temperature change. Science 272(5260):393–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, S, Anderson, R, Bryant, C, Cook, GT, Dougans, A, Freeman, S, Naysmith, P, Schnabel, C, Scott, EM. 2004. Capabilities of the new SUERC 5MV AMS facility for 14C dating. Radiocarbon 46(1):5964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, RT. 1997. Gas Separation by Adsorption Processes. Series on Chemical Engineering, Volume 1. London: Imperial College Press. 364 p.CrossRefGoogle Scholar