Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T05:12:27.367Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Calibration Technique for 14C Data Clusters: Fitting Relative Chronologies onto Absolute Time Scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Herbert Haas
Affiliation:
Desert Research Institute, P.O. Box 19040, Las Vegas, Nevada 89132, USA
Matthew R. Doubrava
Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas, Department of Anthropology, 4505 South Maryland Parkway, Las Vegas, Nevada 89154, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Application of radiocarbon dating to a short chronology is often limited by the wide probability ranges of calibrated dates. These wide ranges are caused by multiple intersections of the 14C age with the tree-ring curve. For a single unrelated 14C date, each intersection presents a probable solution. When several dates on different events are available, identification of the most probable solution for each event is possible if one can obtain some information on the relation between these events. We present here a method for such identifications.

To demonstrate the method, we selected a series of 14C dates from mortuary monuments of the Egyptian Old Kingdom. Corrected 14C dates from seven monuments were used. Calibration of these dates produced three absolute ages with single intersections and four ages with 3–5 intersections. These data are compared to a historical chronology, which places the dated events at a younger age. If each intersection is chosen as a potential anchor point of the “correct” chronology, 17 solutions must be tested for the best fit against the historical chronology. The latter is based on the length of the reign of each pharaoh during the studied time span. The spreadsheet has the function of determining the probability of fit for each of the solutions. In a second step the 17 probability values and their offset between the historical and the 14C chronology are graphically analyzed to find the most probable offset. This offset is then applied as a correction to the estimated chronology to obtain an absolute time scale for the dated events.

Type
Part 1: Methods
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Clayton, P. A. 1994 Chronicle of the Pharaohs. London, Thames and Hudson Ltd.: 224 p.Google Scholar
Edwards, I. E. S. 1985 The Pyramids of Egypt. Harmondsworth, England, Viking: 328 p.Google Scholar
Haas, H., Devine, J., Wenke, R., Lehner, M., Wölfli, W. and Bonani, G. 1987 Radiocarbon chronology and the historical calendar in Egypt. In Aurenche, O., Evin, J. and Hours, F., eds. Chronologies in the Near East. BAR International Series 379: 585606.Google Scholar
Hassan, F. A. and Robinson, S. W. 1987 High-precision radiocarbon chronometry of ancient Egypt, and comparisons with Nubia, Palestine and Mesopotamia. Antiquity 61: 119135.Google Scholar
Niklaus, T. R. 1991 CalibETH, User's Manual. Zurich, Reprozentrale ETH Hönggerberg: 151 p.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M. and Kra, R. S., eds. 1986 Proceedings of the 12th International 14C Conference, Calibration Issue. Radiocarbon 28(2B).Google Scholar
Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds. 1993 Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 1244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Plicht, J. 1993 The Groningen radiocarbon calibration program. In Stuiver, M., Long, A. and Kra, R. S., eds., Calibration 1993. Radiocarbon 35(1): 231237.Google Scholar