Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T07:36:24.976Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

British Museum Natural Radiocarbon Measurements III

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Harold Barker  and
John Mackey
Harold Barker
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory, British Museum, London W.C.I.
John Mackey
Affiliation:
Research Laboratory, British Museum, London W.C.I.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The third series of radiocarbon measurements made at the British Museum Research Laboratory is reported in the following list. Equipment and method used are as described previously (British Museum I) and, as in previous lists, the error terms are not based solely on counting statistics, but are widened to include contributions of ±80 years for possible isotopic fractionation effects and ±100 years for the de Vries effect. Ages are calculated on a half-life of 5568 ± 30 years. NBS oxalic acid is now used as a reference standard in place of 100-yr-old oak. The latter gave an age-corrected value almost exactly 95% of the oxalic-acid activity and thus no corrections are required to our previous date lists to bring them into line with the new standard.

Type
Research Article
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 3 , 1961 , pp. 39 - 45
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Arkell, W. J., 1947, The geology of the country around Weymouth: Great Britain Geol. Survey Mem., xii, 386 p.Google Scholar
Arnold, J. R., and Libby, W. F., 1951, Radiocarbon dates: Science, v. 113, p. 111–120.Google Scholar
Barker, H., and Mackey, C. J., 1959, British Museum natural radiocarbon measurements I: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 811–86.Google Scholar
Bury, H., 1950, Blashenwell tufa: Bournemouth Nat. Sci. Soc. Proc., v. 39, p. 48–51.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1938, Microlithic industries from tufa deposits at Prestatyn, Flintshire and Blashenwell, Dorset: Prehist. Soc. Proc., n.s., v. 4, p. 330–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fergusson, James, and Burgess, James, 1880, The cave temples of India: London, W. H. Allen & Co., p. 232.Google Scholar
Gfeller, Chr., Oeschger, H., and Schwarz, U., 1961, Bern radiocarbon dates II: Radiocarbon, v. 3, p. 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, A., 1948, Ancient Egyptian materials and industries: London, Edward Arnold & Co., 3rd ed., p. 161.Google Scholar
McAulay, I. R., and Watts, W. A., 1961, Dublin radiocarbon dates I: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 3, p.Google Scholar
Mason, R. J., 1957, The Transvaal Middle Stone Age and statistical analysis: South African Archaeol. Bull., v. 12, no. 48, p. 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mason, R. J. 1958, Bone tools at the Kalkbank Middle Stone Age site and the Megapansgat Australopithecine locality, Central Transvaal: South African Archaeol. Bull., v. 13. p. 85.Google Scholar
Newton, E. T., 1895, On a human skull and limb bones found in the Paleolithic terrace gravel at Galley Hill, Kent: Geol. Soc. [London] Quart. Jour., v. 51, p. 505–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakley, K. P., and Montagu, M. F. A., 1949, A reconsideration of the Galley Hill skeleton: British Mus. (Nat. History) Geology Bull., v. 1, no. 2, p. 25–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ralph, E. K., 1959, University of Pennsylvania radiocarbon dates III: Am. Jour. Sci. Radioc. Supp., v. 1, p. 45–58.Google Scholar
Rankine, W. F., and Dimbleby, G. W., 1960, Further investigations at a Mesolithic site at Oakhanger, Selbourne Hants: Prehist. Soc. Proc., n.s., v. 26, p. 246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, Clement, 1896, An Early Neolithic kitchen-midden and tufaceous deposit at Blashenwell, near Corfe Castle: Dorset Nat. History and Field Club Proc., v. 17, p. 67–75.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F., 1958, The 1957–8 excavations at Windmill Hill: Antiquity, v. 32, p. 268–269.Google Scholar
Smith, I. F. 1959, Excavations at Windmill Hill, Avebury, Wilts. 1957–8: Wiltshire Archaeol, Mag., v. 57, p. 149–152.Google Scholar
Trechman, C. T., 1936, Mesolithic flints from the submerged forest at West Hartlepool: Prehist. Soc. Proc., n.s., v. 2, paper no. 7, p. 161–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trechman, C. T. 1947, Mesolithic flints on the Durham coast: Yorkshire Geol. Soc. Proc., v. 27, p. 23–32.Google Scholar
Vyse, Howard, 1842, The pyramids of Gizeh: London, John Weale and G. W. Nickisson, v. 3, p. 20.Google Scholar
Watts, W. A., 1960, C-14 dating and the Neolithic in Ireland: Antiquity, v. 34, p. 111–112.Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L., 1934, Ur excavations II: The Royal Cemetery, Oxford, Oxford Univ. Press, p. 155–160.Google Scholar