Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:34:19.320Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bomb-Pulse Dating of Human Material: Modeling the Influence of Diet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Elisavet Georgiadou  and
Kristina Stenström
Elisavet Georgiadou*
Affiliation:
Lund University, Department of Physics, Division of Nuclear Physics, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
Kristina Stenström
Affiliation:
Lund University, Department of Physics, Division of Nuclear Physics, Box 118, SE-221 00 Lund, Sweden
*
Corresponding author: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons during the 1950s and early 1960s produced large amounts of radiocarbon. This 14C bomb pulse provides useful age information in numerous scientific fields, e.g. in geosciences and environmental sciences. Bomb-pulse dating can also be used to date human material (e.g. in forensics and medical science). Bomb-pulse dating relies on precise measurements of the declining 14C concentration in atmospheric carbon dioxide collected at clean-air sites. However, local variations in the 14C specific activity of air and foodstuffs occur, which are caused by natural processes as well as by various human activities. As 14C enters the human body mainly through the diet, variations of 14C concentration in foodstuffs need to be considered. The marine component of the diet is believed to be of particular importance due to the non-equilibrium in 14C specific activity between the atmosphere and aquatic reservoirs during the bomb pulse. This article reviews the 14C concentration in marine foodstuffs during the bomb-pulse era, and models how the marine component in one's diet can affect the precision of bomb-pulse dating of human material.

Type
Methods, Applications, and Developments
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 800 - 807
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Broecker, WS, Schulert, A, Olson, EA. 1959. Bomb carbon-14 in human beings. Science 130(3371):331–2.Google Scholar
Campana, SE, Jones, C, McFarlane, GA, Myklevoll, S. 2006. Bomb dating and age validation using the spines of spiny dogfish (Squalus acanthias). Environmental Biology of Fishes 77(3–4):327–36.Google Scholar
Cook, GT, MacKenzie, AB, Naysmith, P, Anderson, R. 1998. Natural and anthropogenic 14C in the UK coastal marine environment. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity 40(1):89–111.Google Scholar
Currie, LA. 2004. The remarkable metrological history of radiocarbon dating [II]. Journal of Research of the National Institute of Standards and Technology 109(2):185–217.Google Scholar
Druffel, EM, Mok, HYI. 1983. The history of human gallstones: application of the post-bomb radiocarbon signal. Radiocarbon 25(2):629–36.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). 2008. Food consumption pattern of main food groups [WWW document]. http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/templates/ess/documents/food_security_statistics/DietFoodGroupsProtein_en.xls. Accessed March 2009.Google Scholar
Goodsite, ME, Rom, W, Heinemeier, J, Lange, T, Ooi, S, Appleby, PG, Shotky, W, van der Knaap, WO, Lohse, C, Hansen, TS. 2001. High-resolution AMS 14C dating of post-bomb peat archives of atmospheric pollutants. Radiocarbon 43(2B):495–515.Google Scholar
Harkness, DD, Walton, A. 1969. Carbon–14 in the biosphere and humans. Nature 223(5212):1216–8.Google Scholar
Harkness, DD, Walton, A. 1972. Further investigations of the transfer of bomb 14C to man. Nature 240(5379):302–3.Google Scholar
Hua, Q, Barbetti, M. 2004. Review of tropospheric bomb 14C data for carbon cycle modeling and age calibration purposes. Radiocarbon 46(3):1273–98.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM. 1993. Pre- and post-bomb radiocarbon in fish otoliths. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 114(4):549–54.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM. 1995. Application of the bomb radiocarbon chronometer to the validation of redfish Centroberyx affinis age. Canadian Journal of Aquatic Sciences 52:1399–405.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM, Johnston, JM, Smith, DC, Morison, AK, Robertson, SG. 1997. Use of the bomb radiocarbon chronometer for age validation in the blue grenadier Macruronus novaezelandiae. Marine Biology 128(4):557–63.Google Scholar
Kalish, JM, Nydal, R, Nedreaas, KH, Burr, GS, Eine, GL. 2001. A time history of pre- and post- bomb radiocarbon in the Barents Sea derived from Arcto-Norwegian cod otoliths. Radiocarbon 43(2B):843–55.Google Scholar
Karlén, I, Olsson, IU, Kållberg, P, Kilicci, S. 1964. Absolute determination of the activity of two C14 dating standards. Arkiv för Geofysik 4(22):465–71.Google Scholar
Lynnerup, N, Kjeldesen, H, Heegard, S, Jacobsen, C, Heinemeier, J. 2008. Radiocarbon dating of the human eye lens crystallines reveal proteins without carbon turnover throughout life. PloS ONE 3(1): e1529, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0001529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nydal, R, Lövseth, K, Syrstad, O. 1971. Bomb 14C in the human population. Nature 232(5310):418–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reimer, PJ, Brown, TA, Reimer, RW. 2004. Discussion: reporting and calibration of post-bomb 14C data. Radiocarbon 46(3):1299–304.Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Bhardwaj, RD, Buchholz, BA, Druid, H, Frisén, J. 2005a. Retrospective birth dating of cells in humans. Cell 122(1):133–43.Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Buchholz, BA, Bergman, L-E, Druid, H, Frisén, J. 2005b. Age written in teeth by nuclear tests. Nature 437(7057):333–4.Google Scholar
Spalding, KL, Arner, E, Westermark, PO, Bernard, S, Buchholz, BA, Bergmann, O, Blomqvist, L, Hoffstedt, J, Näslund, E, Britton, T, Concha, H, Hassan, M, Rydén, M, Freisén, J, Arner, P. 2008. Dynamics of fat cell turnover in humans. Nature 453(7196):783–7.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Polach, HA. 1977. Discussion: reporting of 14C data. Radiocarbon 19(3):355–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ubelaker, DH, Buchholz, BA. 2006. Complexities in the use of bomb-curve radiocarbon to determine time since death of human skeletal remains. Forensic Science Communication 8(10). https://e-reports-ext.llnl.gov/pdf/319544.pdf. Accessed March 2009.Google Scholar
Weidman, CR, Jones, GA. 1993. A shell-derived time history of bomb 14C on Georges Bank and its Labrador Sea implications. Journal of Geophysical Research 98(C8):14,577–88.Google Scholar
Wild, E, Sarlamovsky, KA, Golser, R, Kutschera, W, Priller, A, Puchegger, S, Rom, W, Steier, P, Vycudilik, W. 2000. 14C dating with the bomb peak: an application to forensic medicine. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):944–50.Google Scholar