Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T04:45:40.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bias, Accuracy, and Precision

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

Marian Scott
Marian Scott*
Affiliation:
Department of Statistics The University of Glasgow
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Letter to the Editor
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 41 , Issue 2 , 1999 , pp. 221 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The American Journal of Science 

References

Bland, JM, Altman, DG. 1986. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. The Lancet 8476:307–10.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, KL, Tauber, H, Bonde, N, Christensen, K, Theodórsson, P. 1999. A 23-year retrospective blind check of accuracy of the Copenhagen radiocarbon dating system. Radiocarbon 41(1):9–15.Google Scholar
Stuiver, M, Pearson, GW. 1993. High-precision bidecadal calibration of the radiocarbon time scale, AD 1950–500 BC and 2500–6000 BC. Radiocarbon 35(1): 1–24.Google Scholar