Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:24:56.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Compact AMS Facilities a Competitive Alternative to Larger Tandem Accelerators?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2016

M Suter ,
A M Müller ,
V Alfimov ,
M Christl ,
T Schulze-König ,
P W Kubik ,
H-A Synal ,
C Vockenhuber  and
L Wacker
M Suter*
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
A M Müller
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
V Alfimov
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
M Christl
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
T Schulze-König
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
P W Kubik
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
H-A Synal
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
C Vockenhuber
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
L Wacker
Affiliation:
ETH Zurich, Laboratory of Ion Beam Physics, Schafmattstrasse 20, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland
*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In the last decade, small and compact accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) systems became available operating at terminal voltages of 1 MV and below. This new category of instruments has become competitive for radiocarbon detection to larger tandem accelerators and many of these instruments are successfully used for 14C dating or biomedical applications. The AMS group at ETH Zurich has demonstrated that small instruments can be built, which allow measurements also of other radionuclides such as 10Be, 26Al, 129I, and the actinides. 41Ca measurements can be performed with sufficient sensitivity for biomedical applications. A summary of recent developments made at the 500kV Pelletron in Zurich is given and its performance is compared with that of a commercial compact instrument from the company High Voltage Engineering Europe (HVEE) in Amersfoort, the Netherlands, operating at 1MV at CNA in Seville, Spain, as well as with that of larger AMS facilities. It turns out that the ion optics, stripper design, and the detection system are critical for the performance.

Type
Accelerator Mass Spectrometry
Information
Radiocarbon , Volume 52 , Issue 2: 20th Int. Radiocarbon Conference Proceedings , 2010 , pp. 319 - 330
Copyright
Copyright © 2010 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona 

References

Alfimov, V, Synal, H-A. 2010. 129I AMS at 0.5MV tandem accelerator. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):769–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamizo, E, López-Gutierrez, JM, Ruiz-Gómez, A, Santos, FJ, García-León, M, Maden, C, Alfimov, V. 2008. Status of the compact 1 MV AMS facility at the Centro Nacional de Aceleradores (Spain). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 266(10):2217–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christl, M, Wacker, L, Lippold, J, Synal, H-A, Suter, M. 2007. Protactinium-231: a new radionuclide for AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 262(2):379–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Döbeli, M, Kottler, C, Stocker, M, Weinmann, S, Synal, H-A, Grajcar, M, Suter, M. 2004. Gas ionization chambers with silicon nitride windows for the detection and identification of low energy ions. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 219–220:415–9.Google Scholar
Fifield, LK, Synal, H-A, Suter, M. 2004. Accelerator mass spectrometry of plutonium at 300 kV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:802–6.Google Scholar
Goslar, T, Czernik, J, Goslar, E. 2004. Low-energy 14C AMS in Poznań Radiocarbon Laboratory, Poland. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:5–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grajcar, M, Döbeli, M, Kubik, PW, Maden, C, Suter, M, Synal, H-A. 2004. 10Be measurements with terminal voltages below 1 MV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:190–4.Google Scholar
Grajcar, M, Döbeli, M, Kubik, PW, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L, Suter, M. 2007. New concepts of 10Be AMS at low energies. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):173–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughey, BJ, Klinkowstein, RE, Shefer, RE, Skipper, PL, Tannenbaum, SR, Wishnok, JS. 1997a. Design of a compact 1 MV AMS system for biomedical research. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):153–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughey, BJ, Shefer, RE, Klinkowstein, RE, Zhao, X-L, Kieser, WE, Litherland, AE. 1997b. Experimental investigation of the destruction of 1 MeV 12CH2 molecules in single and double stripping foils. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):186–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacob, S. 2001. Beschleunigermassenspektrometrie (AMS) von 14C bei tiefen Energien [PhD dissertation]. Dissertation Nr. 14071; ETH Zürich.Google Scholar
Jacob, SAW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A. 2000. Ion beam interaction with stripper gas—key for AMS at sub MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):235–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, J, Middleton, R, Tang, H. 1982. Modifications of an FN tandem for quantitative 10Be measurement. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 193(3):601–16.Google Scholar
Klein, MG, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2006. A compact 1 MV multi-element AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 249(1–2):764–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klein, MG, van Staveren, HJ, Mous, DJW, Gottdang, A. 2007. Performance of the compact HVE 1 MV multi-element AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):184–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klody, GM, Schroeder, JB, Norton, GA, Loger, RL, Kitchen, RL, Sundquist, ML. 2005. New results for single stage low energy carbon AMS. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 240(1–2):463–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, HW, Galindo-Uribarri, A, Chang, KH, Kilius, LR, Litherland, AE. 1984. The 12CH2 2+ molecule and radiocarbon dating by accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):208–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindhard, J, Nielsen, V, Scharff, M. 1968. Approximation method in classical scattering by screened coulomb fields. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Matematisk-fysiske Meddelelser 36(10):1–32.Google Scholar
Litherland, AE. 1984. Accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):100–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mous, DJW, Purser, KH, Fokker, W, van den Broek, R, Koopmans, RB. 1997. A compact 14C isotope ratio mass spectrometer for biomedical applications. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):159–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Müller, AM, Christl, M, Döbeli, M, Kubik, PW, Suter, M, Synal, H-A. 2008. 10Be AMS measurements at low energies (E < 1 MeV). Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 266(10):2207–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niklaus, TR, Bonani, G, Guo, Z, Suter, M, Synal, H-A. 1994. Optimising tandem accelerator stripping efficiency by simulation of charge changing processes. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92(1–4):115–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Purser, KH. 1994. A future AMS/chromatography instrument for biochemical and environmental measurements. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 92(1–4):201–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisbeck, GM, Yiou, F, Bourles, D, Lestringuez, J, Deboffle, D. 1984. Measurement of 10Be with a Tandetron accelerator operating at 2 MV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 5(2):175–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raisbeck, GM, Yiou, F, Bourles, D, Lestringuez, J, Deboffle, D. 1987. Measurements of 10Be and 26Al with a Tandetron AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 29(1–2):22–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, ML, Culp, RA, Dvoracek, DK, Hodgins, GWL, Neary, MP, Noakes, JE. 2004. The 14C AMS system at The University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulze-König, T, Maden, C, Denk, E, Freeman, SPHT, Stocker, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Walczyk, T. 2010. Comparison of 41Ca analysis on 0.5 MV and 5 MV AMS systems. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):752–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigmund, P, Winterbon, KB. 1974. Small angle multiple scattering in the screened Coulomb region. Nuclear Instruments and Methods 119:541–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skog, G. 2007. The single stage AMS machine at Lund University: status report. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stocker, M. 2006. AMS bei tiefen Energien [PhD dissertation]. Dissertation nr 16787; ETH Zürich.Google Scholar
Stocker, M, Bertschinger, R, Döbeli, M, Grajcar, M, Jacob, S, Scheer, J, Suter, M, Synal, H-A. 2004. Status of the PSI/ETH compact AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:104–8.Google Scholar
Stocker, M, Döbeli, M, Grajcar, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2005. A universal and competitive compact AMS facility. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 240(1–2):483–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M. 1998. A new generation of small facilities for accelerator mass spectrometry. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 139(1–4):150–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M. 2004. 25 years of AMS—a review of recent developments. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:139–48.Google Scholar
Suter, M, Jacob, S, Synal, H-A. 1997. AMS of 14C at low energies. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 123(1–4):148–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M, Huber, R, Jacob, SAW, Synal, H-A, Schroeder, JB. 1999. A new small accelerator for radiocarbon dating. In: Applications of Accelerators in Research and Industry. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings 475:665–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M, Jacob, SWA, Synal, H-A. 2000. Tandem AMS at sub-MeV energies—status and prospects. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):144–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M, Döbeli, M, Grajcar, M, Müller, A, Stocker, M, Sun, GY, Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2007. Advances in particle identification in AMS at low energies. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suter, M, Chamizo, E, Müller, AM, Synal, H-A. 2010. The relevance of ion optics for the development of small AMS facilities. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):722–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Wacker, L. 2010. AMS measurement techniques after 30 years: possibilities and limitations of low energy systems. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268(7–8):701–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Jacob, S, Suter, M. 2000b. New concepts for radiocarbon detection systems. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 161–163:29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Jacob, S, Suter, M. 2000b. The PSI/ETH small radiocarbon dating system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 172(1–4):1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synal, H-A, Döbeli, M, Jacob, S, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2004. Radiocarbon AMS towards its low-energy limits. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:339–45.Google Scholar
Synal, H-A, Stocker, M, Suter, M. 2007. MICADAS: a new compact radiocarbon AMS system. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259(1):7–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vogel, JS, Turteltaub, KW, Felton, JS, Gledhill, BL, Nelson, DE, Southon, JR, Proctor, ID, Davis, JC. 1990. Application of AMS to the biomedical sciences. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 52(3–4):524–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Chamizo, E, Fifield, LK, Stocker, M, Suter, A, Synal, H-A. 2005. Measurement of actinides on a compact AMS system working at 300 kV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 240(1–2):452–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wacker, L, Bonani, G, Friedrich, M, Hajdas, I, Kromer, B, Němec, M, Ruff, M, Suter, M, Synal, H-A, Vockenhuber, C. 2010. MICADAS: routine and high-precision radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 52(2–3):252–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wittkower, AB, Betz, HD. 1973. Equilibrium-charge-state distributions of energetic ions (Z > 2) in gaseous and solid media. Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables 5(2):113–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, X-L, Litherland, AE, Doupé, JP, Kieser, WE. 2004. The potential for AMS analysis of 10Be using BeF– . Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 223–224:199–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar