Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T22:18:41.278Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Aragonite Fraction Dating of Vermetids in the Context of Paleo Sea-Level Curves Reconstruction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2020

Vinicius N Moreira
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Radiocarbono, Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza s/n, 24210-346, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Kita D Macario*
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Radiocarbono, Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza s/n, 24210-346, Niterói, RJ, Brazil Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Marinha e Ambientes Costeiros, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil
Renato B Guimarães
Affiliation:
Laboratório de Difração de Raios X, Instituto de Física, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Av. Gal. Milton Tavares de Souza s/n, 24210-346, Niterói, RJ, Brazil
Fábio F Dias
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Marinha e Ambientes Costeiros, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil
Julia C Araujo
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Marinha e Ambientes Costeiros, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil
Perla Jesus
Affiliation:
Programa de Pós-graduação em Biologia Marinha e Ambientes Costeiros, Universidade Federal Fluminense, Outeiro São João Batista, s/n, Niterói, 24001-970, RJ, Brazil
Katerina Douka
Affiliation:
Oxford Radiocarbon Unit (ORAU), Dyson Perrins Building, South Parks Road, OxfordOX1 3QY, United Kingdom Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History, Kahlaische Str. 10, 07745, Jena, Germany
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Identifying and tackling recrystallization is a critical factor in the reliable radiocarbon (14C) dating of carbonates, since exogenous carbon can be incorporated and thus mask the real age of the samples. Vermetids are among the most important bioindicators used for paleo sea-level reconstruction, and the accuracy of their chronology can significantly impact sea-level curves. Age differences larger than 1 14C kyr before and after acid etching, combined with X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis that indicates a significant amount of calcite still remains in the shell, led us to apply the previously developed carbonate density separation protocol (CarDS). Using a solution of sodium polytungstate, with density of 2.80 g/cm3, we successfully separated different carbonate fractions for a set of 10 vermetid samples from the coast of Rio de Janeiro, southeast of Brazil. Each separation was verified by XRD analysis and the 14C concentrations of different fractions were compared. The results show that the calcite fraction in the studied vermetid samples varied from 12 to 63% and aragonite fraction ages are up to 2 14C kyr older than the raw samples, thus confirming the efficacy of CarDS in removing young carbonates and the importance of density separation to vermetids prior to accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) dating.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2020 by the Arizona Board of Regents on behalf of the University of Arizona

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Angulo, RJ, de Souza, MC. 2014. Revisão conceitual de indicadores costeiros de paleoníveis marinhos quaternários no Brasil. Quat. Environ. Geosci. 5.Google Scholar
Angulo, RJ, Pessenda, LCR, de Souza, MC. 2002. O significado das datações ao 14C na reconstrução de paleoníveis marinhos e na evolução das barreiras quaternárias do litoral paranaense. Rev. Bras. Geociências 32:95106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, RGV, Haworth, RJ. 2000. Smooth or oscillating late Holocene sea-level curve? Evidence from cross-regional statistical regressions of fixed biological indicators. Mar. Geol. 163: 353365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bathurst, RGC. 1972. Carbonate sediments and their diagenesis. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Brock, F, Higham, T, Ditchfield, P, Ramsey, CB. 2010. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon. 52(1):103112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, Elizabeth A, Walter, LM. 1987. Relative precipitation rates of aragonite and Mg calcite from seawater: Temperature or carbonate ion control? Geology 15.2:111114.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castro, JWA, Suguio, K, Seoane, J, Cunha, AM, Dias, FF. 2014. Sea-level fluctuations and coastal evolution in the state of Rio de Janeiro, southeastern Brazil. An. Acad. Bras. Cienc. 86: 671683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cherkinsky, A, Culp, RA, Dvoracek, DK, Noakes, JE. 2010. Status of the AMS facility at the University of Georgia. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 268:867870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douka, K, Hedges, REM, Higham, TFG. 2010. Improved AMS 14C dating of shell carbonates using high-precision X-ray diffraction and a novel density separation protocol (CarDS). Radiocarbon 52:735751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, RL, Cheng, H, Cutler, KB, Gallup, CD, Richards, DA. 2013. Geochemical evidence for Quaternary sea-level changes. In: Treatise on geochemistry. 2nd ed. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Friedman, GM. 1959. Identification of carbonate minerals by staining methods. Journal of Sedimentary Research 29:8797.Google Scholar
Fyfe, WS, Bischoff, JL. 1965. The calcite-aragonite problem. Soc. Econ. Paleont. Mineral. Spec. Publ. 13:313. doi: 10.2110/pec.65.07.0003.Google Scholar
Jamieson, JC. 1953. Phase equilibrium in the system calcite-aragonite. J. Chem. Phys. 21:13851390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jesus, PB, Dias, FF, de Azeredo Muniz, R, Macário, KCD, Seoane, JCS, Quattrociocchi, DGS, Cassab, R de CT, Aguilera, O, de Souza, RCCL, Alves, EQ. 2017. Holocene paleo-sea level in southeastern Brazil: an approach based on vermetids shells. J. Sediment. Environ. 2, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelletat, D. 2006. Beachrock as sea-level indicator? Remarks from a geomorphological point of view. J. Coast. Res. 15581564.Google Scholar
Kominz, MA. 2001. Sea level variations over geologic time. In: Encyclopedia of ocean sciences. 2nd ed. Academic Press. p. 185193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laborel, J, Laborel-Deguen, F. 2005. Sea-level indicators, biologic. In: Encyclopedia of coastal science. Springer. p. 833834.Google Scholar
Leorri, E, Fatela, F, Drago, T, Bradley, SL, Moreno, J, Cearreta, A. 2013. Lateglacial and Holocene coastal evolution in the Minho estuary (N Portugal): Implications for understanding sea-level changes in Atlantic Iberia. The Holocene 23:353363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linares, R, Macario, KD, Santos, GM, Carvalho, C, dos Santos, HC, Gomes, PRS, Castro, MD, Oliveira, FM, Alves, EQ. 2015. Radiocarbon measurements at LAC-UFF: Recent performance. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:341345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loftus, E, Rogers, K, Lee-Thorp, J. 2015. A simple method to establish calcite: aragonite ratios in archaeological mollusc shells. Journal of Quaternary Science 30(8):731735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstam, HA, Weiner, S. 1989. On biomineralization. Oxford University Press on Demand.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macario, KD, Alves, EQ, Moreira, VN, Oliveira, FM, Chanca, IS, Jou, RM, Diaz, M. 2017. Fractionation in the graphitization reaction for 14C-AMS analysis: The role of Zn× the role of TiH2. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry 423:3945.Google Scholar
Macario, KD, Oliveira, FM, Carvalho, C, Santos, GM, Xu, X, Chanca, IS, Alves, EQ, Jou, RM, Oliveira, MI, Pereira, BB. 2015. Advances in the graphitization protocol at the Radiocarbon Laboratory of the Universidade Federal Fluminense (LAC-UFF) in Brazil. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 361:402405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, L, Dominguez, JML, Bittencourt, ACSP. 2003. Fluctuating Holocene sea levels in eastern and southeastern Brazil: evidence from multiple fossil and geometric indicators. Journal of Coastal Research:101124.Google Scholar
Morse, JW, Wang, Q, Tsio, MY. 1997. Influences of temperature and Mg: Ca ratio on CaCO3 precipitates from seawater. Geology 25:8587.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pirazzoli, PA. 2005. Sea-level indicators, geomorphic. In: Encyclopedia of coastal science. Springer. p. 836838.Google Scholar
Pluet, J, Pirazzoli, PA. 1991. World atlas of Holocene sea-level changes. Elsevier.Google Scholar
Psuty, NP. 1988. Sediment budget and dune/beach interaction. Journal of Coastal Research: 14.Google Scholar
Strachan, KL, Finch, JM, Hill, T, Barnett, RL. 2014. A late Holocene sea-level curve for the east coast of South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 110:19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suguio, K. 1999. Geologia do Quaternário e mudanças ambientais (presente+ passado= futuro?). São Paulo: Oficina de Textos. 408 p.Google Scholar
Suguio, K, Martin, L, Bittencourt, AC da SP. 1985. Flutuaçoes do nivel relativo do mar durante o Quaternario superior ao longo do litoral Brasileiro e suas implicaçoes na sedimentaçao costeira. Revista Brasileira de Geosciencias 15(4):273286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taft, WH. 1967. Modern carbonate sediments. In: Developments in sedimentology. Elsevier. p. 2950.Google Scholar
Toby, BH, Von Dreele, RB. 2013. GSAS-II: the genesis of a modern open-source all purpose crystallography software package. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 46:544549.Google Scholar
Walker, RG, James, NP. 1992. Facies models. Response to sea level change. Toronto. Geosci. Canada (Reprint Ser. 1). 3rd ed. 454 p.Google Scholar
Xu, X, Trumbore, SE, Zheng, S, Southon, JR, McDuffee, KE, Luttgen, M, Liu, JC. 2007. Modifying a sealed tube zinc reduction method for preparation of AMS graphite targets: reducing background and attaining high precision. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B 259:320329.Google Scholar
Yates, T. 1986. Studies of non-marine mollusks for the selection of shell samples for radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 28(2A):457463.Google Scholar